|
2 months ago ::
Mar 16, 2013 - 6:12AM
#51
|
Date Joined:
Mar 14, 2013
|
This. With the caveat that gnomes need to die in a fire, etc.
I'd rather see halflings go.
They often do when I DM a non-Middle-Earth campaign.
Yeah, the system/setting I'm working on has a few short races, but no halflings. If I do bring them in, it will be in the form of Homo floresiensis.
|
|
|
|
2 months ago ::
Mar 20, 2013 - 6:05AM
#52
|
|
|
Honestly, I thought the sorcerer was perfect except for the whole. "Because I have dragon blood, I have heavy armor and use a sword." Stick him in robes or leather armor, and a dagger and I like him just fine.
This was how I felt. I LIKE Melee Sorcerers, but I want them shiv fighting or staff fighting, rather than using big armour and weapons (but only after a certain amount of WP is expended? That was the odd thing).
A great man once said "If WotC put out boxes full of free money there'd still be people complaining about how it's folded." – Boraxe
|
|
|
|
2 months ago ::
Mar 20, 2013 - 9:28AM
#53
|
Date Joined:
Mar 14, 2013
|
Honestly, I thought the sorcerer was perfect except for the whole. "Because I have dragon blood, I have heavy armor and use a sword." Stick him in robes or leather armor, and a dagger and I like him just fine.
This was how I felt. I LIKE Melee Sorcerers, but I want them shiv fighting or staff fighting, rather than using big armour and weapons (but only after a certain amount of WP is expended? That was the odd thing).
Yeah, if a classes fluff justifies better than wizard armor and weapons, that's cool. IMO, warlocks should have light armor and more weapons than wizards, for instance, but there shouldn't be a weird paywall built into the class where you have to use some resource before you can use those things, they should just be a proficiency, and the sorcerer should definately have been in cloth or light armor, maybe medium. Totally cool with swords, though. thumbs up for swords. also, spears fit in a sort of visual imagining of the class, to me.
|
|
|
