Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 49  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 49 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Maybe I'm in the Minority
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 2:57PM #1
Bohrdumb
Date Joined: Mar 31, 2010
Posts: 1,989
I'm really unhappy with the direction things are taking. Next seems to fail to hold onto things that were good and added a bunch of things that were bad. It completely ignores a unified design concept and feels like a schlew of random elements tacked together.

I get that this is early in the life cycle, but all in all it does not catch my interest.


There are a few things I might snag for homeruling like Advantage/Disadvantage and Normalized attacks and defenses. I like a game that is mathmatically clean and designed with some elegance and simplicity. Neither of these things seem to currently be present.

All in all my network of players are pretty disappointed in what we're seeing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 2:58PM #2
Litigation
Date Joined: Jun 10, 2008
Posts: 3,135
As I've already elaborated in a few other threads, I'll just say that I totally agree.
D&DN Paladin: Half-Fighter, half-Cleric, all useless.
D&DN Ranger: Third-Fighter, third-Rogue, third-Druid, all useless. With one interesting concept that has its execution botched.

My 4e Character Op work:

Character guides Show
Builds Show
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:00PM #3
Salla
Date Joined: Apr 3, 2003
Posts: 23,524
To paraphrase a former president, we aren't going forward to the future, we're going past to the back.

But then, the whole point of 5e was to throw 4e under the bus and welcome back the grognards.  Hopefully, the playtesting will fix this.
Another day, another three or four entries to my Ignore List.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:01PM #4
MattLangley
Date Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 111
Though I don't completely agree, I do lean towards this perspective.  I do like my look at the wizard... with at-wills and dailies it feels like a half step backwards, though with the martial classes it feels like a full step backwards to 3.5.  Without changes I'd would just opt to play 3.5 with the many supplements that add in martial options vs playing a martial class in 5e.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:11PM #5
Bohrdumb
Date Joined: Mar 31, 2010
Posts: 1,989
I just really wanted a system that was better, this seems to be backwards entirely. And the fact that classes are completely imbalanced infuriates me. The idea that you should be 'mundane' because you don't have magic is a bit preposterous.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:12PM #6
ShinQuickMan
Date Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 1,799
So far, the Beta's coming out almost exactly as I was expecting it to. That's not a good thing for me.

I'm not getting high hopes unless the devs reveal some mods I agree with. Or, if they at least admit that the prototype thus far is "pre-modded" for grognards, and the true baseline game looks much different under the hood.

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:14PM #7
frothsof
Date Joined: Jun 4, 2010
Posts: 10,474
imo it is best not to compare it to 4e, they are so completely different i think they are just totally different games. at this time, 5e is a retro-clone. i do think 5e is a pretty good retro-clone though.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:16PM #8
Mand12
Date Joined: Jun 17, 2010
Posts: 16,931

May 24, 2012 -- 3:00PM, Salla wrote:

To paraphrase a former president, we aren't going forward to the future, we're going past to the back.

But then, the whole point of 5e was to throw 4e under the bus and welcome back the grognards.  Hopefully, the playtesting will fix this.



Actually that's not the whole point, and a lot of the things that the people who like 4e are wanting (I include myself in this camp) they've said are coming later on.

Don't write it off completely yet.  Things will change.

D&D Next = D&D:  Quantum Edition
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:17PM #9
frothsof
Date Joined: Jun 4, 2010
Posts: 10,474

May 24, 2012 -- 3:16PM, Mand12 wrote:

May 24, 2012 -- 3:00PM, Salla wrote:

To paraphrase a former president, we aren't going forward to the future, we're going past to the back.

But then, the whole point of 5e was to throw 4e under the bus and welcome back the grognards.  Hopefully, the playtesting will fix this.



Actually that's not the whole point, and a lot of the things that the people who like 4e are wanting (I include myself in this camp) they've said are coming later on.

Don't write it off completely yet.  Things will change.



i believe you will fight for it mand!

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 24, 2012 - 3:17PM #10
Mand12
Date Joined: Jun 17, 2010
Posts: 16,931
I will be and I have been.  And they are listening.
D&D Next = D&D:  Quantum Edition
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 49  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 49 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing