New Posts For Thread: Speed value in D&D Nexthttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_NextHello!Any idea why they raised the speed values from "small numbers" (in 4e) to "big numbers" again? This makes things problematic when playing combat on a Board (unless you divide the numbers again to come to squares of movement).MagicSN" When using a battle mat, squares are the easiest to use..."Yes, I believe that was my point.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_Next?post_id=528034547#528034547" When using a battle mat, squares are the easiest to use..."Yes, I believe that was my point.Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:44:30 -0600We should use halflings as the standard of measurement.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_Next?post_id=528032819#528032819We should use halflings as the standard of measurement.Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:34:39 -0600Every edition of D&D save ones starting with a 3 ... used distance units that were not real world units in order to make game play easier... hmmmmm.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_Next?post_id=528032679#528032679Every edition of D&D save ones starting with a 3 ... used distance units that were not real world units in order to make game play easier... hmmmmm.Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:27:38 -0600The best bet is to include standard, metric, and squares. And I know someone has already mentioned that wording is a problem. It's only a problem if freelancers actually charge per word (which I'm not gonna believe just because some guy I don't knohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_Next?post_id=528032339#528032339The best bet is to include standard, metric, and squares. And I know someone has already mentioned that wording is a problem. It's only a problem if freelancers actually charge per word (which I'm not gonna believe just because some guy I don't knoSun, 13 Jan 2013 22:05:31 -0600Not really. IF I'm using a battlemap for an encounter, counting out 35 squares (the size of my 1-inch graphpaper) or counting 175 feet by 5s (5, 10, 15... 165, 175, 180) are equally easy. Skip counting is not hard: I work in an elementary school, thehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29626443/Speed_value_in_DD_Next?post_id=528031825#528031825Not really. IF I'm using a battlemap for an encounter, counting out 35 squares (the size of my 1-inch graphpaper) or counting 175 feet by 5s (5, 10, 15... 165, 175, 180) are equally easy. Skip counting is not hard: I work in an elementary school, theSun, 13 Jan 2013 21:26:53 -0600