<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Any Love For Spelljammer?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer</link><description>Anyone here interested in Spelljammer? I'm working on a world set in a Dyson sphere and in order to get around that fast I am thinking of doing a Spelljammer settinging set inside the sphrere. The fluff would be totally different of course although t</description><item><title>Spelljammer was dumb, I mean spaceships in D&amp;D sucking a spellcaster's brains like some sort of Illithidmobile? Gun-toting space rhinos? Gravity planes on sailing ships launched in to the sky? Oxygen bubbles just hand-waved as "magic"? What, no dinos</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer?post_id=529428505#529428505</link><description>Spelljammer was dumb, I mean spaceships in D&amp;D sucking a spellcaster's brains like some sort of Illithidmobile? Gun-toting space rhinos? Gravity planes on sailing ships launched in to the sky? Oxygen bubbles just hand-waved as "magic"? What, no dinos</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:35:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I love Spelljammer. I'm interested in it.And I also love Planescape.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer?post_id=529422865#529422865</link><description>I love Spelljammer. I'm interested in it.And I also love Planescape.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:57:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Good call. It COULD be done well. But will it? I think the chances are high with the current direction of Next, but I've had high hopes and been wrong before. However, it is safe to say the amount of effort into making the next edition amazing hasn't</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer?post_id=528124061#528124061</link><description>Good call. It COULD be done well. But will it? I think the chances are high with the current direction of Next, but I've had high hopes and been wrong before. However, it is safe to say the amount of effort into making the next edition amazing hasn't</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:59:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I just hope if a new Planescape is released they make it a worthy successor and not just another "How to kill Demons and Devils with planar travel."I seriously doubt we'll have the same level of depth and complexity this time, but let us hope I'm wro</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer?post_id=528120501#528120501</link><description>I just hope if a new Planescape is released they make it a worthy successor and not just another "How to kill Demons and Devils with planar travel."I seriously doubt we'll have the same level of depth and complexity this time, but let us hope I'm wro</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:27:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I never played Planescape but I do like reading the PS material and it was one of the sets we had in the 90's. The art was also quite good as well.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29625719/Any_Love_For_Spelljammer?post_id=528118773#528118773</link><description>I never played Planescape but I do like reading the PS material and it was one of the sets we had in the 90's. The art was also quite good as well.</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:04:40 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
