<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Questions about Two-Weapon Defense</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense</link><description>Two-&amp;shy;&acirc;&#x80;&#x90;Weapon DefenseYou can use the weapon you wield in your off hand to defend yourself.Benefit:While you are wielding a different weapon in each hand, you gain a +1 bonus to AC, provided you have proficiency with both weapons.Does "Different</description><item><title>Well, they've made mistakes before in the pregens. Either they made a mistake there or the weapon chart AND the shield description.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense?post_id=527964119#527964119</link><description>Well, they've made mistakes before in the pregens. Either they made a mistake there or the weapon chart AND the shield description.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:33:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Under attacks, the pregen human fighter has 'Shield +3; 1d4 + 2 bludgeoning damage' listed. With a Strength modifier of +2, the only way the shield attack could be made at +3 is if the fighter's level 1 Weapon Attack Bonus applies, which is only appl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense?post_id=527902535#527902535</link><description>Under attacks, the pregen human fighter has 'Shield +3; 1d4 + 2 bludgeoning damage' listed. With a Strength modifier of +2, the only way the shield attack could be made at +3 is if the fighter's level 1 Weapon Attack Bonus applies, which is only appl</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:13:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd allow shields to work with TWD.  But that's because I like the idea, not because it's in the rules.  :P</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense?post_id=527805415#527805415</link><description>I'd allow shields to work with TWD.  But that's because I like the idea, not because it's in the rules.  :P</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:40:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well I'm just going to say that i don't agree with you guys and that I read it differently. Since this is off topic, I'll stop debating it here. If you wish to contunue a rope trick debate, please start up a thread of that and I'll wander over.Though</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense?post_id=527802603#527802603</link><description>Well I'm just going to say that i don't agree with you guys and that I read it differently. Since this is off topic, I'll stop debating it here. If you wish to contunue a rope trick debate, please start up a thread of that and I'll wander over.Though</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:07:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It doesn't state when the spell ends. The spell has NO duration. Nothing says the space vanishes when the doorway does. or that the doorway vanishes if the space does (though it's not much good since it wouldn't lead anywhere). I stand by what I said</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29614421/Questions_about_Two-Weapon_Defense?post_id=527791883#527791883</link><description>It doesn't state when the spell ends. The spell has NO duration. Nothing says the space vanishes when the doorway does. or that the doorway vanishes if the space does (though it's not much good since it wouldn't lead anywhere). I stand by what I said</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:11:27 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
