New Posts For Thread: Dealbreakers for Old D&D playershttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_playersI find it amusing that so many people try to make a point by saying, "I was interested in D&D Next but then they added or changed one thing. Now I will never play it."Can we make a list of issues that people have made this statement about? 1. VaThis is the attitude I was assuming by the use of the phrase 'acting like a troglodyte' in the post that began this part of the conversation.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_players?post_id=527807291#527807291This is the attitude I was assuming by the use of the phrase 'acting like a troglodyte' in the post that began this part of the conversation.Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:26:48 -0600Rewriting Al-Qadim, Anchorome, Maztica, Kara Tur, Katashaka, etc, in what way?[/quote]Al Qadim is pretty fine as is, but needs a little push to fit the Realms just a tad. As for the others, they were made with the intention as addons without thinkinhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_players?post_id=527806763#527806763Rewriting Al-Qadim, Anchorome, Maztica, Kara Tur, Katashaka, etc, in what way?[/quote]Al Qadim is pretty fine as is, but needs a little push to fit the Realms just a tad. As for the others, they were made with the intention as addons without thinkinSun, 06 Jan 2013 13:13:53 -0600Rewriting Al-Qadim, Anchorome, Maztica, Kara Tur, Katashaka, etc, in what way?[/quote]Al Qadim is pretty fine as is, but needs a little push to fit the Realms just a tad. As for the others, they were made with the intention as addons without thinkinhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_players?post_id=527806323#527806323Rewriting Al-Qadim, Anchorome, Maztica, Kara Tur, Katashaka, etc, in what way?[/quote]Al Qadim is pretty fine as is, but needs a little push to fit the Realms just a tad. As for the others, they were made with the intention as addons without thinkinSun, 06 Jan 2013 13:04:17 -0600On ninjapirate's view on races. This is pretty much the compromise I'd like to make when it comes to core. It's not selfish, it's not inclusive, it doesn't push out old concepts or new ones. All I'm asking for is to create something that works outhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_players?post_id=527805215#527805215On ninjapirate's view on races. This is pretty much the compromise I'd like to make when it comes to core. It's not selfish, it's not inclusive, it doesn't push out old concepts or new ones. All I'm asking for is to create something that works outSun, 06 Jan 2013 12:34:58 -0600These are not deal breakers but they are on my wish list:1. High level characters and campaigns are playable.2. High level combat is no more time-consuming than low level combat. 3. Mechanics or guidelines exist for custom building new races, hybridhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29612831/Dealbreakers_for_Old_DD_players?post_id=527797279#527797279These are not deal breakers but they are on my wish list:1. High level characters and campaigns are playable.2. High level combat is no more time-consuming than low level combat. 3. Mechanics or guidelines exist for custom building new races, hybridSun, 06 Jan 2013 08:14:27 -0600