<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Fighter subclasses?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses</link><description>I think Fighters need a subclass choice (like Domains, Traditions, Schemes, etc.) oriented toward what they do other than just kill people and break things.As some examples of ideas:Knight - bonuses related to diplomacy, being respected, etc.Bodyguar</description><item><title>Gladiators and Pugilists of Greece and Rome very mingled in there historically, oh my oops? does that look like the archetypes of Fighter/Rogue/Monk had so much overlap its not funny. The knights fighting styles by the way included pommel and fist st</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses?post_id=527590711#527590711</link><description>Gladiators and Pugilists of Greece and Rome very mingled in there historically, oh my oops? does that look like the archetypes of Fighter/Rogue/Monk had so much overlap its not funny. The knights fighting styles by the way included pommel and fist st</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:57:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Gladiators and Pugilists of Greece and Rome very mingled in there historically, oh my oops? does that look like the archetypes of Fighter/Rogue/Monk had so much overlap its not funny. The knights fighting styles by the way included pommel and fist st</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses?post_id=527590271#527590271</link><description>Gladiators and Pugilists of Greece and Rome very mingled in there historically, oh my oops? does that look like the archetypes of Fighter/Rogue/Monk had so much overlap its not funny. The knights fighting styles by the way included pommel and fist st</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:21:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If we talk about "martial arts" (in France), weaponmasters from 16th century were proficient in around 30 weapons and unarmed melee techniques using head, fist, elbows, and legs only for knocking prone and bull rushes.Apart from this, it was common f</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses?post_id=527590015#527590015</link><description>If we talk about "martial arts" (in France), weaponmasters from 16th century were proficient in around 30 weapons and unarmed melee techniques using head, fist, elbows, and legs only for knocking prone and bull rushes.Apart from this, it was common f</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:00:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I know some swashbucklers, and French Sailors that would argure with you on that.  Savate is a French Sailor's martial art, which was a form of kick boxing and only with the feet.[/quote]Sorry, but savate appeared from french fencing tradition, and i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses?post_id=527584695#527584695</link><description>I know some swashbucklers, and French Sailors that would argure with you on that.  Savate is a French Sailor's martial art, which was a form of kick boxing and only with the feet.[/quote]Sorry, but savate appeared from french fencing tradition, and i</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:57:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Backgrounds are made to be optional, we can't have prime aspect of classe in them.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29603541/Fighter_subclasses?post_id=527581217#527581217</link><description>Backgrounds are made to be optional, we can't have prime aspect of classe in them.</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:57:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
