<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Pre-Gen Human Cleric has incorrect armor</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor</link><description>In the new playtest released, the pre-gen human cleric is given an AC value of 15 because it is wearing studded leather armor, but the lightbringer path nor the cleric class in general give the cleric any armor proficiencies, therefore the pre-gen ch</description><item><title>Its an error carried from the previous 102912_Human Cleric Pre-Gen. Lifebringer doesn't have any armor or shield proficiency, so he shouldn't wear one and have AC 11 unless he doesn't mind having disadvantage on Strenght and Dexterity checks, saving</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor?post_id=527522285#527522285</link><description>Its an error carried from the previous 102912_Human Cleric Pre-Gen. Lifebringer doesn't have any armor or shield proficiency, so he shouldn't wear one and have AC 11 unless he doesn't mind having disadvantage on Strenght and Dexterity checks, saving</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:37:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>They said they would explore armor-less clerics as a sort of "white mage" concept and their free lance of faith reaction on anyone who attacks them seems to be the advantage they get for losing armor; so I would guess the Lightbringer is not supposed</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor?post_id=527510783#527510783</link><description>They said they would explore armor-less clerics as a sort of "white mage" concept and their free lance of faith reaction on anyone who attacks them seems to be the advantage they get for losing armor; so I would guess the Lightbringer is not supposed</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:26:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yea, thats probably where the error lies. I just think the lightbringer with armor could be a tad bit strong because of their disciple of the sun ability making it so they can both avoid hits from high AC aswell as attack the first target every round</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor?post_id=527488029#527488029</link><description>Yea, thats probably where the error lies. I just think the lightbringer with armor could be a tad bit strong because of their disciple of the sun ability making it so they can both avoid hits from high AC aswell as attack the first target every round</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:15:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think it's actually an ommision in the Lighrbringer description, actually, since I don't think they're meant to have no armor proficiency.-KW</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor?post_id=527484181#527484181</link><description>I think it's actually an ommision in the Lighrbringer description, actually, since I don't think they're meant to have no armor proficiency.-KW</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:17:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In the new playtest released, the pre-gen human cleric is given an AC value of 15 because it is wearing studded leather armor, but the lightbringer path nor the cleric class in general give the cleric any armor proficiencies, therefore the pre-gen ch</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29600721/Pre-Gen_Human_Cleric_has_incorrect_armor?post_id=527482887#527482887</link><description>In the new playtest released, the pre-gen human cleric is given an AC value of 15 because it is wearing studded leather armor, but the lightbringer path nor the cleric class in general give the cleric any armor proficiencies, therefore the pre-gen ch</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:13:22 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
