<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Weapon Proficiency Feats?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats</link><description>Hey friendos!Loving the direction of D&amp;D Next. Currently using the 12-17-2012 packet. One thing that has me scratching my head though, is the absence of weapon and armor proficieny feats, especially for the 'Special' weapons group that requires speci</description><item><title>It would be cool if your class granted an amount of simple, martial, or special weapons... so players could pick which weapons their character had trained in.Rogue could be something like all Simple and any 4 Martial weapons, Wizard could be Any 3 Si</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats?post_id=527976683#527976683</link><description>It would be cool if your class granted an amount of simple, martial, or special weapons... so players could pick which weapons their character had trained in.Rogue could be something like all Simple and any 4 Martial weapons, Wizard could be Any 3 Si</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 07:55:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>All the wizard has to do is be a mountain dwarf. Then he can wear any light/medium armor he wants, though medium is better since they get a +1ac wearing it.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats?post_id=527790235#527790235</link><description>All the wizard has to do is be a mountain dwarf. Then he can wear any light/medium armor he wants, though medium is better since they get a +1ac wearing it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:20:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>which i see no problem with. the wizard uses a limit feat to gain a limited class ability. instead ofa) more spellsb) maximised damagec) increased ranged) ambusher (think about it)e) a familiarf) faster movementetcetcetc</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats?post_id=527789361#527789361</link><description>which i see no problem with. the wizard uses a limit feat to gain a limited class ability. instead ofa) more spellsb) maximised damagec) increased ranged) ambusher (think about it)e) a familiarf) faster movementetcetcetc</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:10:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My problem is that say a wizard wants to become proficient in light armor so he can don leather armor...as the new rules state...as long as the wizard is proficient in the armor there is no penalty to casting...there needs to be a light armor profici</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats?post_id=527785439#527785439</link><description>My problem is that say a wizard wants to become proficient in light armor so he can don leather armor...as the new rules state...as long as the wizard is proficient in the armor there is no penalty to casting...there needs to be a light armor profici</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:37:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I would think using the 4E style of proficiency makes perfect sense.  At least until we have something more concrete to draw from.I also tend to think that anyone who takes up an "adventuring" career has at least some familiarity with weaponry, that'</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29599237/Weapon_Proficiency_Feats?post_id=527558389#527558389</link><description>I would think using the 4E style of proficiency makes perfect sense.  At least until we have something more concrete to draw from.I also tend to think that anyone who takes up an "adventuring" career has at least some familiarity with weaponry, that'</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:31:47 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
