New Posts For Thread: Things in the last packet that need to be fixed:http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:Assassinate needs clarification: it should read that you may only use the ability when a target is not aware of your attack instead of presence. Sneak Attack needs to be reworked from the ground up; it should be something like this: you gain advantagYea. The cantrips should probably allow you to add your Int mod as damage. I think that would be fair.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:?post_id=527467655#527467655Yea. The cantrips should probably allow you to add your Int mod as damage. I think that would be fair.Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:42:21 -0600Yeah, haven't seen any of our wizards using sleep (or charm person) in a couple of packets now. However, sleep at 3d8 is pretty awesome for a 1st level spell. You can wait til stuff is damaged to cast it, but that becomes a slippery slope as levels ihttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:?post_id=527467615#527467615Yeah, haven't seen any of our wizards using sleep (or charm person) in a couple of packets now. However, sleep at 3d8 is pretty awesome for a 1st level spell. You can wait til stuff is damaged to cast it, but that becomes a slippery slope as levels iMon, 24 Dec 2012 02:33:54 -0600Personally, I think the 3rd level wizard and the 3rd level fighter are very well balanced against each other. At 3rd level a fighter does 1[w]+2d6+stat. Since a wizard will be using a ranged attack, namely ray of frost, let’s compare apples tohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:?post_id=527467421#527467421Personally, I think the 3rd level wizard and the 3rd level fighter are very well balanced against each other. At 3rd level a fighter does 1[w]+2d6+stat. Since a wizard will be using a ranged attack, namely ray of frost, let’s compare apples toMon, 24 Dec 2012 01:55:17 -0600I think it would be a neat change too. In 2e- it says"The target creature must be seen or otherwise detected to be hit, however, so near-total concealment, such as that offered by arrow slits, can render the spell ineffective."It isn't that big a strhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:?post_id=527467013#527467013I think it would be a neat change too. In 2e- it says"The target creature must be seen or otherwise detected to be hit, however, so near-total concealment, such as that offered by arrow slits, can render the spell ineffective."It isn't that big a strMon, 24 Dec 2012 00:50:17 -0600It is very simple really. The wizard spends 100% of the day overshadowing the fighter in a huge number of areas. It can't also spend 50% of the day overshadowing the fighter at what he is supposed to do best, even if it doesn't overshadow the fighterhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29594707/Things_in_the_last_packet_that_need_to_be_fixed:?post_id=527466995#527466995It is very simple really. The wizard spends 100% of the day overshadowing the fighter in a huge number of areas. It can't also spend 50% of the day overshadowing the fighter at what he is supposed to do best, even if it doesn't overshadow the fighterMon, 24 Dec 2012 00:47:32 -0600