<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: It's REALLY up.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.</link><description>No new classes. :(</description><item><title>I could, possibly, settle for this, as long as the martial assassin is better than it is right now. Because this rogue scheme is terrible. But even then, I would disagree (I'd just be settling). The martial assassin still needs enough things, includi</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.?post_id=527386485#527386485</link><description>I could, possibly, settle for this, as long as the martial assassin is better than it is right now. Because this rogue scheme is terrible. But even then, I would disagree (I'd just be settling). The martial assassin still needs enough things, includi</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:25:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I could, possibly, settle for this, as long as the martial assassin is better than it is right now. Because this rogue scheme is terrible. But even then, I would disagree (I'd just be settling). The martial assassin still needs enough things, includi</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.?post_id=527348577#527348577</link><description>I could, possibly, settle for this, as long as the martial assassin is better than it is right now. Because this rogue scheme is terrible. But even then, I would disagree (I'd just be settling). The martial assassin still needs enough things, includi</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:18:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Even as someone who has pushed (as hard as one can push for these things) for the ability to build a "martial assassin" using just the Rogue class, I do agree.  I hope they continue to put work into the concept, and I hope they avoid shoving the conc</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.?post_id=527346755#527346755</link><description>Even as someone who has pushed (as hard as one can push for these things) for the ability to build a "martial assassin" using just the Rogue class, I do agree.  I hope they continue to put work into the concept, and I hope they avoid shoving the conc</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:29:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Whatever for.... I didnt mention any epic shark jumping, or provide the link to tvtropes.Oh sure he's very versatile.When I typed that I thought I was on topic for something ... now I cant see exactly where but shrug.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.?post_id=527332771#527332771</link><description>Whatever for.... I didnt mention any epic shark jumping, or provide the link to tvtropes.Oh sure he's very versatile.When I typed that I thought I was on topic for something ... now I cant see exactly where but shrug.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:43:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Garthanos I hate you. Fonzy taps machine, legendary mechanics skill.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29540489/Its_REALLY_up.?post_id=527332711#527332711</link><description>Garthanos I hate you. Fonzy taps machine, legendary mechanics skill.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:35:50 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
