New Posts For Thread: Where's two weapon fighting and rapid shot?http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shotDid they put them back on the drawing board or forgot them?If we get rid of minimum logic, we could rule that a warrior with more than 16 Strength can make an arrow explodes on impact and damage foes within 20 feet.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shot?post_id=526773939#526773939If we get rid of minimum logic, we could rule that a warrior with more than 16 Strength can make an arrow explodes on impact and damage foes within 20 feet.Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:50:25 -0600The 2nd ed combat round was one minute and not 6 seconds so a bow firing twice a round wasn't that unrealistic and you could train yourself to fire it faster via specialisation. Also you didn't add dex to your damage with bows and the long sword washttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shot?post_id=526771819#526771819The 2nd ed combat round was one minute and not 6 seconds so a bow firing twice a round wasn't that unrealistic and you could train yourself to fire it faster via specialisation. Also you didn't add dex to your damage with bows and the long sword wasMon, 10 Dec 2012 14:36:50 -0600Sometimes I wonder if the same people who whine about unrealistic archery abilities also complain about archery not being a viable combat style.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shot?post_id=526771039#526771039Sometimes I wonder if the same people who whine about unrealistic archery abilities also complain about archery not being a viable combat style.Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:06:13 -0600Rapid shot was a makeshift solution to make ranged characters even viable as damage dealers in 3.5e[/quote]I agree that rapid shot makes little sense. People who fire at twice (or more) the normal rates of competent archers is stupid.[/quote]I agree.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shot?post_id=526771023#526771023Rapid shot was a makeshift solution to make ranged characters even viable as damage dealers in 3.5e[/quote]I agree that rapid shot makes little sense. People who fire at twice (or more) the normal rates of competent archers is stupid.[/quote]I agree.Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:05:42 -0600Rapid shot was a makeshift solution to make ranged characters even viable as damage dealers in 3.5e[/quote]I agree that rapid shot makes little sense. People who fire at twice (or more) the normal rates of competent archers is stupid.[/quote]I agree.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29529045/Wheres_two_weapon_fighting_and_rapid_shot?post_id=526770951#526770951Rapid shot was a makeshift solution to make ranged characters even viable as damage dealers in 3.5e[/quote]I agree that rapid shot makes little sense. People who fire at twice (or more) the normal rates of competent archers is stupid.[/quote]I agree.Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:02:36 -0600