<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: D&amp;D Next Q&amp;A: Racial Stats, Expertise Dice &amp; Skills</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills</link><description>In this week's D&amp;D Next Q&amp;A, Rodney answers questions on racial stat bonuses, meaningful choices with maneuvers and expertise dice, and skills.</description><item><title>Casters are shedding limitations in this version because they are losing spell power. The wizard's (or Magic-User's) limitations were what the devlopers thought allowed them to be so powerful. But with each edition they keep trying, in my eyes at lea</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills?post_id=526756605#526756605</link><description>Casters are shedding limitations in this version because they are losing spell power. The wizard's (or Magic-User's) limitations were what the devlopers thought allowed them to be so powerful. But with each edition they keep trying, in my eyes at lea</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:26:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Tony careful you ar emaking to much sense here. Careful or forums go boom.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills?post_id=526755093#526755093</link><description>Tony careful you ar emaking to much sense here. Careful or forums go boom.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:46:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah. You're "never" bombastic...Looks like another "never" to me.Your argument seems to be that fighters (read: maneuver using classes) do not have real options to use a maneuver that they don't have? Or if they do happen to have it, its either the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills?post_id=526755089#526755089</link><description>Yeah. You're "never" bombastic...Looks like another "never" to me.Your argument seems to be that fighters (read: maneuver using classes) do not have real options to use a maneuver that they don't have? Or if they do happen to have it, its either the</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:46:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes. You make a couple interesting assumptions: Assumption 1, that the fighter took Cleave as one of the 2 at-wills he will ever have.[/quote]It's a viable choice at 1st level, and is only one of 4 exploit choices he makes at 1st.  A 3.5 fighter at 1</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills?post_id=526753687#526753687</link><description>Yes. You make a couple interesting assumptions: Assumption 1, that the fighter took Cleave as one of the 2 at-wills he will ever have.[/quote]It's a viable choice at 1st level, and is only one of 4 exploit choices he makes at 1st.  A 3.5 fighter at 1</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:41:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah. You're "never" bombastic...Looks like another "never" to me.Your argument seems to be that fighters (read: maneuver using classes) do not have real options to use a maneuver that they don't have? Or if they do happen to have it, its either the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29525413/DD_Next_QA:_Racial_Stats,_Expertise_Dice__Skills?post_id=526751143#526751143</link><description>Yeah. You're "never" bombastic...Looks like another "never" to me.Your argument seems to be that fighters (read: maneuver using classes) do not have real options to use a maneuver that they don't have? Or if they do happen to have it, its either the</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:27:08 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
