<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What in D&amp;D Next right now would keep you from buying it?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it</link><description>What in D&amp;D Next right now would keep you from buying it if those elements remain at launch. You can expand this to what elements are not in D&amp;D Next that would case you to not buy it or just any reason whatsoever that you won't buy it.</description><item><title>Honestly, something like that would work wonders for my acceptance of Next.  Even if they kept it bounded, by giving people a static class-based AC bonus instead of AC from armor, it's exactly the kind of minor concessions toward reasonability that w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it?post_id=526803559#526803559</link><description>Honestly, something like that would work wonders for my acceptance of Next.  Even if they kept it bounded, by giving people a static class-based AC bonus instead of AC from armor, it's exactly the kind of minor concessions toward reasonability that w</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:11:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Somehitng like that would be good.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it?post_id=526757689#526757689</link><description>Somehitng like that would be good.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:24:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, "taking off armor" and "healing through it" are the problems created by the "armor as HP" model.If you treat armor HP as true temporary HP, then those always come off the top.  You'd lose the 5 HP from chainmail and take another 11 HP of real d</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it?post_id=526757225#526757225</link><description>Yeah, "taking off armor" and "healing through it" are the problems created by the "armor as HP" model.If you treat armor HP as true temporary HP, then those always come off the top.  You'd lose the 5 HP from chainmail and take another 11 HP of real d</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:15:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The real trick is finding a compelling reason for both DMs and players to purchase new books. 4E's everything is core was a good idea but implemented badly.The best approach is to have books that include rules for both DMs and players. Its should inc</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it?post_id=526756211#526756211</link><description>The real trick is finding a compelling reason for both DMs and players to purchase new books. 4E's everything is core was a good idea but implemented badly.The best approach is to have books that include rules for both DMs and players. Its should inc</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:30:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Agreed. Hmm... I feel I may have inadvertently hijacked the thread so I'll a attempt a course correction here to get back on track. Despite my comments above, there are no specific rules or play test choices that are deal breakers for me.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29524863/What_in_DD_Next_right_now_would_keep_you_from_buying_it?post_id=526756199#526756199</link><description>Agreed. Hmm... I feel I may have inadvertently hijacked the thread so I'll a attempt a course correction here to get back on track. Despite my comments above, there are no specific rules or play test choices that are deal breakers for me.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:28:18 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
