New Posts For Thread: Bring Back Encounter Powers?http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_PowersD&DN makes me laugh at times. Signaature spells are more or less encounter powers by any other name and they have already added at wills. They may have 4th ed written all over them but 3.5 had them in the Book of Nine Swords IIRC and 3.5 aso had at wYou are making my point. You are applying conditions that would be removed from the simulation.FYI I know a thing about the physical shape someone has to be in for combat. In a way its all academic since maneuvers arent limited enough.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_Powers?post_id=526206199#526206199You are making my point. You are applying conditions that would be removed from the simulation.FYI I know a thing about the physical shape someone has to be in for combat. In a way its all academic since maneuvers arent limited enough.Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:54:25 -0600Seems perfectly reasonable to me.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_Powers?post_id=526192527#526192527Seems perfectly reasonable to me.Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:04:29 -0600In my exeriance many people don't mind that you can only do 4 of these atacks in one encounter.The problem seems to be more why you can't do the same encounter manuver more then once.after using encounter atack A your so tired that you can't do it aghttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_Powers?post_id=526192489#526192489In my exeriance many people don't mind that you can only do 4 of these atacks in one encounter.The problem seems to be more why you can't do the same encounter manuver more then once.after using encounter atack A your so tired that you can't do it agMon, 19 Nov 2012 02:57:27 -0600Its a valid point but I think when people talk about realism, it comes from the practical application of the game system to their games and what your talking about here is the abstraction on paper. Another words, practical experiance vs. concept. Chttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_Powers?post_id=526192091#526192091Its a valid point but I think when people talk about realism, it comes from the practical application of the game system to their games and what your talking about here is the abstraction on paper. Another words, practical experiance vs. concept. CMon, 19 Nov 2012 01:52:11 -0600Encounter abilities are perfectly realistic, or at least as much as anything else in the game. If you've played a sport you know that you absolutely can not sustain your maximum effort non-stop. You have to pace yourself and only give max effort in bhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29499223/Bring_Back_Encounter_Powers?post_id=526191677#526191677Encounter abilities are perfectly realistic, or at least as much as anything else in the game. If you've played a sport you know that you absolutely can not sustain your maximum effort non-stop. You have to pace yourself and only give max effort in bMon, 19 Nov 2012 00:44:34 -0600