New Posts For Thread: D&D Beforehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_BeforeI don't usually post threads about my blog. But I just started a new series of blog articles that I thought would be of particular interest to the community. I'll be posting a new installment every week. (Barring the week on which the first of theIn the first D&D Before article, I said we'd look at "whether the goals that the designers set for themselves were met, and whether they will be carried into the Next iteration of D&D". I never said I would limit myself to a hyper-literal acceptancehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_Before?post_id=528025595#528025595In the first D&D Before article, I said we'd look at "whether the goals that the designers set for themselves were met, and whether they will be carried into the Next iteration of D&D". I never said I would limit myself to a hyper-literal acceptanceSun, 13 Jan 2013 16:47:35 -0600No, I just didn't feel like discussing the superficial (or what I called the "nominal") point, but rather the underlying problem that the article was addressing.I wrote: "Nominally about magic item levels"You said, "What this article is talking abouthttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_Before?post_id=528025245#528025245No, I just didn't feel like discussing the superficial (or what I called the "nominal") point, but rather the underlying problem that the article was addressing.I wrote: "Nominally about magic item levels"You said, "What this article is talking aboutSun, 13 Jan 2013 16:37:36 -0600No, I just didn't feel like discussing the superficial (or what I called the "nominal") point, but rather the underlying problem that the article was addressing.I wrote: "Nominally about magic item levels"You said, "What this article is talking abouthttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_Before?post_id=528016851#528016851No, I just didn't feel like discussing the superficial (or what I called the "nominal") point, but rather the underlying problem that the article was addressing.I wrote: "Nominally about magic item levels"You said, "What this article is talking aboutSun, 13 Jan 2013 13:02:30 -0600Wrec, I think you missed the point about magic items. What this article is talking about is the connection between the cost of the magic item, and the worth of it. In 3ed, two magic items could have the same pricetag, but one could be a better buy fohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_Before?post_id=528013603#528013603Wrec, I think you missed the point about magic items. What this article is talking about is the connection between the cost of the magic item, and the worth of it. In 3ed, two magic items could have the same pricetag, but one could be a better buy foSun, 13 Jan 2013 11:36:48 -0600In the final installment, I discuss feats, magic items, and negative hp!http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29484195/DD_Before?post_id=527995475#527995475In the final installment, I discuss feats, magic items, and negative hp!Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:04:06 -0600