<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Wandering Monsters: Things From Beyond The Stars</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars</link><description>Wandering Monsters  Things From Beyond The StarsBy James WyattBeholders, mind flayers, and aboleths have snagged the brains of monster handler James thisweek. Take a look at these three aberrations after you get a good feel for the current working de</description><item><title>What if the party is facing a group of fire elementals and they all have protection from fire active?  Would that mean less XP?   [/quote]The next time the DM will use white dragons, ice giants and frost salamanders. Fire resistance will be useless.L</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars?post_id=525885179#525885179</link><description>What if the party is facing a group of fire elementals and they all have protection from fire active?  Would that mean less XP?   [/quote]The next time the DM will use white dragons, ice giants and frost salamanders. Fire resistance will be useless.L</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:06:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The descriptions are spot on iconic D&amp;D versions of the monsters, but am I the only one who thinks the beholder actually does not really fit the definition of the aberration.Quote: "Their bodies and minds are so unlike natural creatures that they are</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars?post_id=525884587#525884587</link><description>The descriptions are spot on iconic D&amp;D versions of the monsters, but am I the only one who thinks the beholder actually does not really fit the definition of the aberration.Quote: "Their bodies and minds are so unlike natural creatures that they are</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:47:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>What if the party is facing a group of fire elementals and they all have protection from fire active?  Would that mean less XP?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars?post_id=525883143#525883143</link><description>What if the party is facing a group of fire elementals and they all have protection from fire active?  Would that mean less XP?</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:57:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Some aberrations (= unnutural criatures) need cult of followers who lick their .. feet. With lots of symbiontic grafts.I know beholders are loner because they are too proud to live together but..  they are too smart to live like oucasts. They want ru</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars?post_id=525876323#525876323</link><description>Some aberrations (= unnutural criatures) need cult of followers who lick their .. feet. With lots of symbiontic grafts.I know beholders are loner because they are too proud to live together but..  they are too smart to live like oucasts. They want ru</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:53:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>At least in my 4e Monster Manual, the Beholder Eye Tyrant (the closest thing to the classic beholder) doesn't have an anti-magic eye attack. Its central eye simply dazes. The other eyes are sort of mixed around too, but none are what I'd call an anti</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29479739/Wandering_Monsters:_Things_From_Beyond_The_Stars?post_id=525862505#525862505</link><description>At least in my 4e Monster Manual, the Beholder Eye Tyrant (the closest thing to the classic beholder) doesn't have an anti-magic eye attack. Its central eye simply dazes. The other eyes are sort of mixed around too, but none are what I'd call an anti</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:56:45 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
