New Posts For Thread: Human Subraceshttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_SubracesIn the playtest package humans are the only race without a "subrace" despite being the most diverse and adaptive race. And, because they're less of a "hook" for the race and racial powers humans get very blank bonuses.What about changing that? Say, tIt makes, if you think about it Jester. It's considered much more rude in RL to call someone by their supposed 'Race'. On the otherhand, cultural Identity even within a single country is very important to people. I myself am Scot-Irish on my Fathehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_Subraces?post_id=524596833#524596833It makes, if you think about it Jester. It's considered much more rude in RL to call someone by their supposed 'Race'. On the otherhand, cultural Identity even within a single country is very important to people. I myself am Scot-Irish on my FatheSat, 29 Sep 2012 09:37:32 -0500i enjoy that so many people are okay with Subraces as long as we just don't call them "Subraces" and instead call them "origins" or "regions".http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_Subraces?post_id=524596603#524596603i enjoy that so many people are okay with Subraces as long as we just don't call them "Subraces" and instead call them "origins" or "regions".Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:30:09 -0500To be fair, I don't recall any issues coming up in previous editions when new human races were released. The Deep Imaskari are a prime example.I don't have a problem with non-magical human subraces in principle. I would prefer to see them tied to grohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_Subraces?post_id=524587257#524587257To be fair, I don't recall any issues coming up in previous editions when new human races were released. The Deep Imaskari are a prime example.I don't have a problem with non-magical human subraces in principle. I would prefer to see them tied to groSat, 29 Sep 2012 00:43:52 -0500VERY, VERY TRUE!My suggestion was a "regional benefit" option for humans. Humans will still have their default option, of course, but a regional benefit would essentially act as a subrace for humans, without actually being one. The best part is, likehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_Subraces?post_id=524586157#524586157VERY, VERY TRUE!My suggestion was a "regional benefit" option for humans. Humans will still have their default option, of course, but a regional benefit would essentially act as a subrace for humans, without actually being one. The best part is, likeFri, 28 Sep 2012 23:00:04 -0500I much prefer this - if anything - for human "sub-races" as well.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29402347/Human_Subraces?post_id=524584485#524584485I much prefer this - if anything - for human "sub-races" as well.Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:05:15 -0500