New Posts For Thread: Response to the Mike Mearls interviewhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview1e and 2e had multiclassing. It was rare because it was fairly hard to actually pull off, barring a few places where it was essential- like 1e PHB bards and PHB Appendix psionics. 4e had similar multiclassing, but it was either Feat-based or you hadDon't forget:* Specialties, backgrounds, etc. will be optional - which means they can all be excluded* Nonetheless, all PHB1 classes will be supportedhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview?post_id=524770341#524770341Don't forget:* Specialties, backgrounds, etc. will be optional - which means they can all be excluded* Nonetheless, all PHB1 classes will be supportedThu, 04 Oct 2012 18:38:46 -0500Don't think its that radical - just have a couple of classes for core mechanic differences.The 'set of rules' could be specialities - choose more and make them more powerful.Then you dont need to make a multiclass, you have building blocks to make yohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview?post_id=524743449#524743449Don't think its that radical - just have a couple of classes for core mechanic differences.The 'set of rules' could be specialities - choose more and make them more powerful.Then you dont need to make a multiclass, you have building blocks to make yoThu, 04 Oct 2012 01:39:07 -05001e and 2e had multiclassing. It was rare because it was fairly hard to actually pull off, barring a few places where it was essential- like 1e PHB bards and PHB Appendix psionics. 4e had similar multiclassing, but it was either Feat-based or you hadhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview?post_id=524743157#5247431571e and 2e had multiclassing. It was rare because it was fairly hard to actually pull off, barring a few places where it was essential- like 1e PHB bards and PHB Appendix psionics. 4e had similar multiclassing, but it was either Feat-based or you hadThu, 04 Oct 2012 01:10:40 -0500Just take what they get at the character level over what the previous level was.At level 4 a Wizard gets just one more level 2 spell. So if you have a Fighter 3/Wizard 1 then just give them 1 level 2 spell. If they get level 5, give them 2 level 3 sphttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview?post_id=524486031#524486031Just take what they get at the character level over what the previous level was.At level 4 a Wizard gets just one more level 2 spell. So if you have a Fighter 3/Wizard 1 then just give them 1 level 2 spell. If they get level 5, give them 2 level 3 spTue, 25 Sep 2012 19:22:31 -0500Just take what they get at the character level over what the previous level was.At level 4 a Wizard gets just one more level 2 spell. So if you have a Fighter 3/Wizard 1 then just give them 1 level 2 spell. If they get level 5, give them 2 level 3 sphttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29378535/Response_to_the_Mike_Mearls_interview?post_id=524477629#524477629Just take what they get at the character level over what the previous level was.At level 4 a Wizard gets just one more level 2 spell. So if you have a Fighter 3/Wizard 1 then just give them 1 level 2 spell. If they get level 5, give them 2 level 3 spTue, 25 Sep 2012 14:10:51 -0500