<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Why two attacks at half damage?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage</link><description>Both specialties Archer and Dual Wielder have this as one of the benefits.  I feel that this in particular does not make it worth while to use.  Twice the chance to miss for half the damage is a wash in most cases, poisoned weapons being an exception</description><item><title>Realisticaslly speaking yes You are far less effective with your off hand then with your main hand (unless you are truly ambidextrous and have trained equally both ways)... that being said, irl, when you are fighting with two-weapons, you typically u</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage?post_id=525538609#525538609</link><description>Realisticaslly speaking yes You are far less effective with your off hand then with your main hand (unless you are truly ambidextrous and have trained equally both ways)... that being said, irl, when you are fighting with two-weapons, you typically u</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:45:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My thoughts on the multiattack feats in DDN are varied.On one hand, I am a fan of the fact they reduced the damage, on the other, at level one at least, it does arguably penalize them.Some of this comes from the way they are treating fighter maneuver</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage?post_id=525477469#525477469</link><description>My thoughts on the multiattack feats in DDN are varied.On one hand, I am a fan of the fact they reduced the damage, on the other, at level one at least, it does arguably penalize them.Some of this comes from the way they are treating fighter maneuver</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:32:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So here is my new theory based on :DW Benefit: you can make two attacks as an action, one with each weapon. All the damage of each of these attacks is halved.Deadly Strike: Benefit: When you hit a creature with a weapon attack, you can spend expertis</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage?post_id=525462361#525462361</link><description>So here is my new theory based on :DW Benefit: you can make two attacks as an action, one with each weapon. All the damage of each of these attacks is halved.Deadly Strike: Benefit: When you hit a creature with a weapon attack, you can spend expertis</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:35:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Realisticaslly speaking yes You are far less effective with your off hand then with your main hand (unless you are truly ambidextrous and have trained equally both ways)... that being said, irl, when you are fighting with two-weapons, you typically u</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage?post_id=525450957#525450957</link><description>Realisticaslly speaking yes You are far less effective with your off hand then with your main hand (unless you are truly ambidextrous and have trained equally both ways)... that being said, irl, when you are fighting with two-weapons, you typically u</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:09:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Shouldn't the dominate hand be significantly more accurate and stronger than the other hand?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29372183/Why_two_attacks_at_half_damage?post_id=525440477#525440477</link><description>Shouldn't the dominate hand be significantly more accurate and stronger than the other hand?</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:57:10 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
