New Posts For Thread: Should WOTC translate the older edition modules to DDN?http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDNLately, i'm reading a lot of threads about unifying the fanbase and supporting the older editions, so i come up with a idea: the updating of older modules for the new version.It is pretty straightforward: take ,for example, Mystara Hollow World or SpI have played several printed D&D 4ed adventures and Games Day,and many of them were just hack and slash dungeon crawls.Being boring and frustrating is indipendent from edition..and i didnt see many differences in style or concept between them and olhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDN?post_id=522247537#522247537I have played several printed D&D 4ed adventures and Games Day,and many of them were just hack and slash dungeon crawls.Being boring and frustrating is indipendent from edition..and i didnt see many differences in style or concept between them and olWed, 25 Jul 2012 01:55:48 -0500So many players have NEVER been exposed to those classics. To them they would be new.Don worry about difficulty. TPK is so rare IME because the DM doesn't want to have to run through the same stuff all over again....it is a real drag to TPK and thenhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDN?post_id=522245633#522245633So many players have NEVER been exposed to those classics. To them they would be new.Don worry about difficulty. TPK is so rare IME because the DM doesn't want to have to run through the same stuff all over again....it is a real drag to TPK and thenTue, 24 Jul 2012 23:44:10 -0500As a long time player, I would say no. I want NEW adventures. How many times are we going to see the same dungeon over and over again? Other long time players will already know all the secrets.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDN?post_id=522239111#522239111As a long time player, I would say no. I want NEW adventures. How many times are we going to see the same dungeon over and over again? Other long time players will already know all the secrets.Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:44:30 -0500I'm in a group that's replaying some of the older adventures. To be honest? They are kind of dopey and frustrating. I can't imagine they'd have broad enough appeal to warrant a reprint.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDN?post_id=522234931#522234931I'm in a group that's replaying some of the older adventures. To be honest? They are kind of dopey and frustrating. I can't imagine they'd have broad enough appeal to warrant a reprint.Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:33:26 -05001. Reprints are rarely greatly profitable. The best that can usually be said is that they are rarely outright disasters, a common fate of new ideas. But even if there is rarely a big loss, there is also little prospect for large gains. 2. The ohttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29246645/Should_WOTC_translate_the_older_edition_modules_to_DDN?post_id=522232657#5222326571. Reprints are rarely greatly profitable. The best that can usually be said is that they are rarely outright disasters, a common fate of new ideas. But even if there is rarely a big loss, there is also little prospect for large gains. 2. The oTue, 24 Jul 2012 15:36:52 -0500