New Posts For Thread: Convincing 4th Edition players to consider 5th Editionhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_EditionThis is not an original post, but sums up incredibly well how I, and I think most of 4E fanbase feel about 5E.The original post is here - www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons-upcom... - full credits to Neonchameleon.Not sure if others have already linkExcellent post. I think it is the ease of DM'ing and clear direction that DDN is going to end up severely lacking in out of all of those. Balance is going to be an issue unless you adhere to a strict adventuring day encounter schedule, so that may behttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_Edition?post_id=522239077#522239077Excellent post. I think it is the ease of DM'ing and clear direction that DDN is going to end up severely lacking in out of all of those. Balance is going to be an issue unless you adhere to a strict adventuring day encounter schedule, so that may beTue, 24 Jul 2012 18:43:27 -0500I've played D&D since Advanced came out and still have my player option books. I've played 3e, 3.5 and currently DM a 4e game while playing in a high level Pathfinder game (which will be my last in that system has I find it has the same problems I'vehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_Edition?post_id=522233537#522233537I've played D&D since Advanced came out and still have my player option books. I've played 3e, 3.5 and currently DM a 4e game while playing in a high level Pathfinder game (which will be my last in that system has I find it has the same problems I'veTue, 24 Jul 2012 16:00:10 -0500No it can't. At least, not as hardcoded rule. A player can improvise, and the improvisation can result in the wizard blinding someone. A fighter can do the same. As I noted, the spell is weaker than any lightsource available to the fighter except forhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_Edition?post_id=522133733#522133733No it can't. At least, not as hardcoded rule. A player can improvise, and the improvisation can result in the wizard blinding someone. A fighter can do the same. As I noted, the spell is weaker than any lightsource available to the fighter except forSat, 21 Jul 2012 19:01:14 -0500Well, the auto companies have been doing it annually for around a century now. Of course, a fair number of times they actually did improve the product besides just change it.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_Edition?post_id=522133725#522133725Well, the auto companies have been doing it annually for around a century now. Of course, a fair number of times they actually did improve the product besides just change it.Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:00:44 -0500No it can't. At least, not as hardcoded rule. A player can improvise, and the improvisation can result in the wizard blinding someone. A fighter can do the same. As I noted, the spell is weaker than any lightsource available to the fighter except forhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29242715/Convincing_4th_Edition_players_to_consider_5th_Edition?post_id=522132987#522132987No it can't. At least, not as hardcoded rule. A player can improvise, and the improvisation can result in the wizard blinding someone. A fighter can do the same. As I noted, the spell is weaker than any lightsource available to the fighter except forSat, 21 Jul 2012 18:18:33 -0500