<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Martial Artist Theme</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme</link><description>One Theme I'd very much would like to see included is the Martial Artist Theme.The Martial Artist Theme should grant access to Feats based on real-life (or inspired by Hollywood) fighting styles like the five Kung-Fu styles (Crane, Monkey, Mantis, Ti</description><item><title>I think Rogue Schemes are going to be where Ninja-type stuff fits in. And with the current popularity of Assassin's Creed, I think it's likely that (either combined with the basic Ninja scheme or separately) we're going to see an Assassin Rogue Schem</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme?post_id=520275165#520275165</link><description>I think Rogue Schemes are going to be where Ninja-type stuff fits in. And with the current popularity of Assassin's Creed, I think it's likely that (either combined with the basic Ninja scheme or separately) we're going to see an Assassin Rogue Schem</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 04:12:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>But how would one feat at 1st level make you a credible ninja character?  What I"m saying is I think you need more elements in order create the subclass. Maybe themes are not appropriate for subclasses like the ninja or swashbuckler.[/quote]It might</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme?post_id=520274663#520274663</link><description>But how would one feat at 1st level make you a credible ninja character?  What I"m saying is I think you need more elements in order create the subclass. Maybe themes are not appropriate for subclasses like the ninja or swashbuckler.[/quote]It might</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 03:39:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I was thinking of this. Basically, way monks have been done before (well, not sure about 4e) is just wrong. - most of the shaolin monk's amazing abilities come from crazy training and thus comparable fitness- you can pick up credible martial arts tec</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme?post_id=520272653#520272653</link><description>I was thinking of this. Basically, way monks have been done before (well, not sure about 4e) is just wrong. - most of the shaolin monk's amazing abilities come from crazy training and thus comparable fitness- you can pick up credible martial arts tec</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:58:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Skills come from backgrounds.So if you want to play a wizard who knows how to be stealthy and steal stuff, you'd play a wizard with, say, the Cutpurse background (which might give you Stealth, Pick Pocket, Open Locks, and Perception as its skills).If</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme?post_id=520272517#520272517</link><description>Skills come from backgrounds.So if you want to play a wizard who knows how to be stealthy and steal stuff, you'd play a wizard with, say, the Cutpurse background (which might give you Stealth, Pick Pocket, Open Locks, and Perception as its skills).If</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:48:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I missed the rogue scheme thief, thanks for pointing that out. Schemes must form the basis for subclasses. I wonder what differentiates a scheme from a class other than schemes are class specific (i.e only Rogues can be thieves, but they can also be</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29149595/Martial_Artist_Theme?post_id=520272465#520272465</link><description>I missed the rogue scheme thief, thanks for pointing that out. Schemes must form the basis for subclasses. I wonder what differentiates a scheme from a class other than schemes are class specific (i.e only Rogues can be thieves, but they can also be</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:44:48 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
