New Posts For Thread: Why play a fighter?http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighterYou gain prof in all things and a +2 damage bonus(that increases every 2 levels it seems by 1). Other than that you are basically doing the same thing every round, a basic attack. Where are my options? A cleric at level 3 can have a higher damage bonbefore in this tread i said that this figter could be realy intresting if it could do some other things with his attacks then just damage.I see that there are improvised actions that could do this, would like to see them more codefied in the releasehttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighter?post_id=520065521#520065521before in this tread i said that this figter could be realy intresting if it could do some other things with his attacks then just damage.I see that there are improvised actions that could do this, would like to see them more codefied in the releaseFri, 25 May 2012 14:25:47 -0500Personally, I hope that the people dissatisfied with the Fighter continue to complain. Its proactive and a good way to keep the issue in the open. In every edition before 4th and the tail end of 3.5 the issue was shot and then drowned for good measurhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighter?post_id=520063853#520063853Personally, I hope that the people dissatisfied with the Fighter continue to complain. Its proactive and a good way to keep the issue in the open. In every edition before 4th and the tail end of 3.5 the issue was shot and then drowned for good measurFri, 25 May 2012 13:40:43 -0500How dare the pregenerated character intended to test out the basics of the game and the core mechanics, not have tons of options, choices and variability. Since there is only one fighter in the playtest, it would be hard to have variety. While the chhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighter?post_id=520063017#520063017How dare the pregenerated character intended to test out the basics of the game and the core mechanics, not have tons of options, choices and variability. Since there is only one fighter in the playtest, it would be hard to have variety. While the chFri, 25 May 2012 13:17:27 -0500Because 2E, those players all have nostalgia about how Fighters were simple.This lead to others hearing it and assuming so: this rockslided down so everyone got groupthink that it must be so.So when 2E fighters clamered against 4E fighter, they assumhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighter?post_id=520062255#520062255Because 2E, those players all have nostalgia about how Fighters were simple.This lead to others hearing it and assuming so: this rockslided down so everyone got groupthink that it must be so.So when 2E fighters clamered against 4E fighter, they assumFri, 25 May 2012 12:57:58 -0500Answer: Because.More Satisfying Answer: There is none.I agree though. I'd have no problem at all with simple Fighters if there were simple Wizards and Clerics to accompany him. It might even entice me to play a game that is entirely so simple, even ihttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29135905/Why_play_a_fighter?post_id=520061477#520061477Answer: Because.More Satisfying Answer: There is none.I agree though. I'd have no problem at all with simple Fighters if there were simple Wizards and Clerics to accompany him. It might even entice me to play a game that is entirely so simple, even iFri, 25 May 2012 12:38:52 -0500