<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Development of DnD Next spurred on by ICv2 article?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article</link><description>Late last year there was an ICv2 article showing Pathfinder outselling DnD. Up to this point, DnD seemed to be pretty set on their DnD Essentials reflavoring of 4e. I can't help but feel the decision to ditch 4e and rebrand the game as DnD Next was d</description><item><title>Which should tell us that this is not what happened.        There of course were people begging for more, but there were not enough of them.        WOTC, or any other business, does not pay any attention to a "promise" to limit production of a line.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article?post_id=519396305#519396305</link><description>Which should tell us that this is not what happened.        There of course were people begging for more, but there were not enough of them.        WOTC, or any other business, does not pay any attention to a "promise" to limit production of a line.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 13:32:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think the point Paizo was making wasn't that they didn't care about sales.   I think their point was that as long as they are making money and have a reliable customer base for their product they don't care where that lands them on the sales chart.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article?post_id=519373717#519373717</link><description>I think the point Paizo was making wasn't that they didn't care about sales.   I think their point was that as long as they are making money and have a reliable customer base for their product they don't care where that lands them on the sales chart.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:07:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You are taking partial edition changes or errata and trying to make them into full and separate editions when they are not.  When you look at full edition runs, 4e is being scrapped woefully early.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article?post_id=519373355#519373355</link><description>You are taking partial edition changes or errata and trying to make them into full and separate editions when they are not.  When you look at full edition runs, 4e is being scrapped woefully early.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:54:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If people stopped twisting things there would be a lot less activity on these forums.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article?post_id=519371417#519371417</link><description>If people stopped twisting things there would be a lot less activity on these forums.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 17:35:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You know, maybe there are as many editions of D&amp;D as there are... editions. OD&amp;D, 1e AD&amp;D, 2e AD&amp;D, 3e D&amp;D (2e D&amp;D?), 4e D&amp;D (3e D&amp;D?) and soon 5e D&amp;D (4e D&amp;D?).</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29096989/Development_of_DnD_Next_spurred_on_by_ICv2_article?post_id=519371389#519371389</link><description>You know, maybe there are as many editions of D&amp;D as there are... editions. OD&amp;D, 1e AD&amp;D, 2e AD&amp;D, 3e D&amp;D (2e D&amp;D?), 4e D&amp;D (3e D&amp;D?) and soon 5e D&amp;D (4e D&amp;D?).</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 17:34:53 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
