<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Turn Undead should be Turn X</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X</link><description>I  was just thinking about the next iteration of clerics or even more broadly divine classes in general (and abjuration magic users) and the turn undead mechanic. The more I thought about it, the more I feel that, moving forward, such characters shou</description><item><title>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)[/quote]I have a power called sack of house cats.[/quote]Sir, that makes you the greatest mage hunter in all of A</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X?post_id=518698387#518698387</link><description>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)[/quote]I have a power called sack of house cats.[/quote]Sir, that makes you the greatest mage hunter in all of A</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:43:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)[/quote]I have a power called sack of house cats.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X?post_id=518698353#518698353</link><description>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)[/quote]I have a power called sack of house cats.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:41:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X?post_id=518698207#518698207</link><description>I dunno.  The "evil" version may be far more fun.(then again, "dusting" a basement full of pimply level-1 wizards may be quite hilarious)</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:31:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Can I take "turn wizards?"  It'd be a nifty retort to their I can do anything idiocy.:hides:</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X?post_id=518698171#518698171</link><description>Can I take "turn wizards?"  It'd be a nifty retort to their I can do anything idiocy.:hides:</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:28:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Turn [something] being a cleric gimmick, with that [something] being selectable is a pretty good idea.Sure, most players will just go with Undead, but it would be great to be able to swap in something else.The only objection I can think of to adding</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29062155/Turn_Undead_should_be_Turn_X?post_id=518698079#518698079</link><description>Turn [something] being a cleric gimmick, with that [something] being selectable is a pretty good idea.Sure, most players will just go with Undead, but it would be great to be able to swap in something else.The only objection I can think of to adding</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:22:52 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
