New Posts For Thread: 4E proponents: What didn't you like about 4E?http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4EI'm curious--what do those of you who are passionate and invested in 4E wish that the edition had done differently? Try to think in terms of bigger-picture design choices, i.e., less "I wish Rune Priests had more stuff" and more "skill challenges werThe first thing I'd add is suggestions for using existing powers for some of those situations. Then, there'd be a section of the chapter on non combat uses of powers, and adjuticating weird uses of skills. Basically, there's at least a handful or arthttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4E?post_id=519188737#519188737The first thing I'd add is suggestions for using existing powers for some of those situations. Then, there'd be a section of the chapter on non combat uses of powers, and adjuticating weird uses of skills. Basically, there's at least a handful or artMon, 30 Apr 2012 13:21:05 -0500Not quite exactly my ideal art style, but it has some things to recommend it. The pinnacle of cover art in D&D is IMHO the 1e PHB. It draws you into a story, suggests depth to the story and the world, and invites you to imagine what's going on and whhttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4E?post_id=519179793#519179793Not quite exactly my ideal art style, but it has some things to recommend it. The pinnacle of cover art in D&D is IMHO the 1e PHB. It draws you into a story, suggests depth to the story and the world, and invites you to imagine what's going on and whMon, 30 Apr 2012 08:52:12 -0500Picks random spell caster from earlier edition... compares to 4e ones and laughs.... shrug ok add in rituals and the numbers may not be hilariously lesshttp://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4E?post_id=519175229#519175229Picks random spell caster from earlier edition... compares to 4e ones and laughs.... shrug ok add in rituals and the numbers may not be hilariously lessMon, 30 Apr 2012 05:03:33 -0500'The 3.5 books looked cheap as all hell. I detested the exterior design of those books.[/quote]Yeah, I definitely did not care for the 3.x exterior book design either. I find the overall dress of the 4e books considerably more aesthetically pleasing.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4E?post_id=519170699#519170699'The 3.5 books looked cheap as all hell. I detested the exterior design of those books.[/quote]Yeah, I definitely did not care for the 3.x exterior book design either. I find the overall dress of the 4e books considerably more aesthetically pleasing.Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:36:18 -0500What do I hate most about 4e? Pixies.http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29032239/4E_proponents:_What_didnt_you_like_about_4E?post_id=519170619#519170619What do I hate most about 4e? Pixies.Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:30:10 -0500