<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Which classes (from which editions) are your favorite?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite</link><description>And why?My short list:Warlock (3.5) for crunch. A caster with nothing but at-will spells and a scaling attack that you can apply all sorts of modifiers to is hella fun to play.Warlock (4th) for fluff. I love the ability to make different pacts, each</description><item><title>I've *always* loved paladins from any edition.  I take it all the way back to the AD&amp;D Rogues Gallery.  There's a picture of a paladin slaying a black dragon, and that sort of "holy fighter" aspect just called to me.  I've always been a fan of the La</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite?post_id=515786983#515786983</link><description>I've *always* loved paladins from any edition.  I take it all the way back to the AD&amp;D Rogues Gallery.  There's a picture of a paladin slaying a black dragon, and that sort of "holy fighter" aspect just called to me.  I've always been a fan of the La</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:17:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>OD&amp;D: fighting man. I went through so many of these... until a run of good luck, high hp, and finding a magic sword +2 (big deal back then) lead him to one great victory after another. My fighter living meant the other party members lived as well, so</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite?post_id=515783001#515783001</link><description>OD&amp;D: fighting man. I went through so many of these... until a run of good luck, high hp, and finding a magic sword +2 (big deal back then) lead him to one great victory after another. My fighter living meant the other party members lived as well, so</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:40:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>2nd: Specialist Wizard3.5: Specialist Wizard 4e: DruidI like to play the fantastic in a FPRG.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite?post_id=515780507#515780507</link><description>2nd: Specialist Wizard3.5: Specialist Wizard 4e: DruidI like to play the fantastic in a FPRG.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:39:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>OD&amp;D- Elf2e-      Blade Dancer3.5-     Swordsage 4e-      SwordmageCan you detect a theme here? I fell in love with the warrior-sage archetype when I first saw Alec ****ss in Star Wars. Another theme is that only the elf was in the core rule books. W</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite?post_id=515776859#515776859</link><description>OD&amp;D- Elf2e-      Blade Dancer3.5-     Swordsage 4e-      SwordmageCan you detect a theme here? I fell in love with the warrior-sage archetype when I first saw Alec ****ss in Star Wars. Another theme is that only the elf was in the core rule books. W</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:15:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Clearly elves are just humans that spent so many generations in the feywilde that the magical nature of the realm altered them via magically exposed evolution, while orcs were human that evolved down a different branch, allowing humans to mate with b</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/28884481/Which_classes_(from_which_editions)_are_your_favorite?post_id=515758213#515758213</link><description>Clearly elves are just humans that spent so many generations in the feywilde that the magical nature of the realm altered them via magically exposed evolution, while orcs were human that evolved down a different branch, allowing humans to mate with b</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:12:27 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
