Community

 
Jump Menu:
Switch to Forum Live View Draven's First Game
2 years ago  ::  Sep 09, 2011 - 3:43PM #1
draven_defay
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 840
How long the game took.

1 Hour

How many standard action cards are in each player's discard pile.

Drow 2 Hero 0

How many minor action cards are in each player's discard pile.

Drow 0 Hero 1

How many immediate action cards are in each player's discard pile.

Drow 1 Hero 2

How many standard action cards are in each player's hand.

Drow 4 Hero 5

How many minor action cards are in each player's hand.

Drow 1 Hero 1

How many immediate action cards are in each player's hand.

0

How many gold the winning player had left.

Vault 7 Supply 1

How many creatures are left in each player's creature deck.

Drow 1 Hero 1

The total levels of all deployed creatures for each player at the game's end.

Drow Living 17 Drow Dead 11
Hero Living 8 Hero Dead 11

Heroes Won

My fellow playtester was concerned about what might happen if you "spawn camped" someone and blocked up all of their start area with your own figures, as impossible as that seems with the current rules.

He started in the bottleneck start area and it was instrumental in his victory, he was able to turtle and kill each of my creatures as they approached. This seemed like a problem. He didn't intentionally turtle the whole game, but once I backed him into the corner, we both don't think it was possible for me to win.

Nowhere that we could find does it state in the rules that you cannot end your activation inside a square that holds an ally (or an enemy if you are using flight or scurry). Also, flight does not state that it ignores the "stop when you become adjacent to an enemy" rule, but we assume the intent is that it does.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 09, 2011 - 4:41PM #2
WotC_Peter_Lee
Date Joined: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 312
Did counterattacking make it seem like engaging the enemy was a bad idea?
Peter Lee
Tabletop Games Designer/Developer
Dungeons & Dragons R&D
Wizards of the Coast
Twitter: @minipete
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 09, 2011 - 4:49PM #3
draven_defay
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 840
I would say it *made* it a bad idea, because that's what I did...and I died. I really like the mechanic though. The main problem is that once I had less gold than him, he could essentially sit in a bottleneck and let time expire. With something like victory areas that might be alleviated. I did openly avoid attacking the rogue because of his as of now auto sneak attack. So basically the Rogue got free reign to shank anyone he wanted because I didn't want to give him an extra attack, don't know if that's intentional.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 09, 2011 - 4:55PM #4
draven_defay
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 840
I mean made it a bad idea in a bottleneck. It makes it a bad idea to attack a group, then makes it a good idea to cluster your forces, then makes you a prime target for a fireball.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 09, 2011 - 6:27PM #5
Cassan
Date Joined: Aug 7, 2011
Posts: 680
I would say that reinforces the need for an objective.  The first thing I was surprised at when I started the game was the lack of an objective.  It seemed basically just a face off and who runs out of gold first.

Far better would be to put something into the center of the board and say 'go get it' and whoever gets it gets some bonus points.

VP Points versus gold seems another issue.  I would rather forget about VP points and make it all about gold and not running out first.  Put some objectives on the map where you can get more gold.
 
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 10, 2011 - 12:07PM #6
logicweaver
Date Joined: Mar 20, 2010
Posts: 3
Yeah I dont like or understand the Victory points. Unless they have some rules that say player with most victory point after mulitple games. Maybe a tourney format would use victory points but just as a pul out of the closet boardgame I dont see the need. I have only played it a few times and the rules are a good start.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 10, 2011 - 2:15PM #7
draven_defay
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 840

Sep 10, 2011 -- 12:07PM, logicweaver wrote:

Yeah I dont like or understand the Victory points. Unless they have some rules that say player with most victory point after mulitple games. Maybe a tourney format would use victory points but just as a pul out of the closet boardgame I dont see the need. I have only played it a few times and the rules are a good start.




Because you can cause someone else to run out of gold, then they cause you to run out of gold through retalliatory attacks. Victory points are basically a tie-breaker should you need it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing