The best flying hate card

30 posts / 0 new
Last post
Immovable Object
Enchantment

During your declare blockers step, creatures lose all abilities until after blockers are declared.
I like it.  Is the "until" clause necessary?
Break the Card: A great contest run by Dilleux_Lepaire in the Cards and Combo's forums! Support the Card: An homage to Break the Card I run on the You Make the Card forums! Support the Card winners:
Show
Week 1: Savor the Moment - Winner: ConfusedAsUsual!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29788879/CONTEST_Card_Support:_Savor_the_Moment?pg=1
Week 2: Grinning Ignus - Winners: Lobster667 and VRdragoon!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29797229/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Grinning_Ignus?pg=1
Week 3: Transcendence - Winner: Dilleux_Lepaire!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29806577/CONTEST__Support_the_Card:_Transcendence?pg=1
Week 4a: Rofellos's Gift - Winner: SuperSpawnWrithe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29816423/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Rofelloss_Gift
Week 4b: Mortus Strider - Winner: Libe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29820463/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Mortus_Strider
Week 5: High Priest of Penance - Winners: Dilleux_Lepaire and Dudibus!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29921687/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_High_Priest_of_Penance?pg=1
can't have a fight over first strike
Your touch is suddenly less deadly and I laugh and your attempts to break my tackle.
Break the Card: A great contest run by Dilleux_Lepaire in the Cards and Combo's forums! Support the Card: An homage to Break the Card I run on the You Make the Card forums! Support the Card winners:
Show
Week 1: Savor the Moment - Winner: ConfusedAsUsual!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29788879/CONTEST_Card_Support:_Savor_the_Moment?pg=1
Week 2: Grinning Ignus - Winners: Lobster667 and VRdragoon!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29797229/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Grinning_Ignus?pg=1
Week 3: Transcendence - Winner: Dilleux_Lepaire!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29806577/CONTEST__Support_the_Card:_Transcendence?pg=1
Week 4a: Rofellos's Gift - Winner: SuperSpawnWrithe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29816423/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Rofelloss_Gift
Week 4b: Mortus Strider - Winner: Libe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29820463/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Mortus_Strider
Week 5: High Priest of Penance - Winners: Dilleux_Lepaire and Dudibus!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29921687/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_High_Priest_of_Penance?pg=1
I believe it is. Without the until the loses all abilities would probably be permanent. And would affect deathtouch, first strike, trample... Which is not my intent.

As it is, all this enchantment does is it makes creatures with flying, unblockable, landwalk and Pyreheart Wolf blockable.
Personal Sanctuary doesn't continue to work during your opponents turn.  Nevermind, I see what you did there.  I need to read more carefully.

You are right about just removing evasion.  Might be undercosted then.  I actually liked it more when I thought it nuetered everyone.  I think its a very interesting trade off.
Break the Card: A great contest run by Dilleux_Lepaire in the Cards and Combo's forums! Support the Card: An homage to Break the Card I run on the You Make the Card forums! Support the Card winners:
Show
Week 1: Savor the Moment - Winner: ConfusedAsUsual!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29788879/CONTEST_Card_Support:_Savor_the_Moment?pg=1
Week 2: Grinning Ignus - Winners: Lobster667 and VRdragoon!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29797229/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Grinning_Ignus?pg=1
Week 3: Transcendence - Winner: Dilleux_Lepaire!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29806577/CONTEST__Support_the_Card:_Transcendence?pg=1
Week 4a: Rofellos's Gift - Winner: SuperSpawnWrithe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29816423/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Rofelloss_Gift
Week 4b: Mortus Strider - Winner: Libe!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29820463/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_Mortus_Strider
Week 5: High Priest of Penance - Winners: Dilleux_Lepaire and Dudibus!
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29921687/CONTEST_Support_the_Card:_High_Priest_of_Penance?pg=1
Might be. It's still a sideboard card though, so anything but 2 and 3 cmc seems wrong.
Immovable Object Enchantment During your declare blockers step, creatures lose all abilities until after blockers are declared.



Cute, but why blue? That kinda defeats the perverse "purpose" of flying hate, putting it in the best color for flying.
139359831 wrote:
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
---- Autocard is your friend. Lightning Bolt = Lightning Bolt
Ability loss is not off-blue so I don't see any mechanical problems.

This being the best anti-flying card was more of a joke, since this card kills ALL evasion, not just flying.

It doesn't hinder you that you play it in blue. Since it is not a symmetric effect, it only occurs during your declare blockers step.

Or were you commenting on how blue is too good already?
This could be green white.
True.
the best flying hate card is clearly Plummet, just ask bay_falconer
192884403 wrote:
firstrike
56965458 wrote:
97820278 wrote:
56965458 wrote:
97820278 wrote:
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
the best flying hate card is clearly Plummet, just ask bay_falconer


No, that's Giant Spider.

Yxoque wrote:
This forum can't even ****ing self-destruct properly.

IMAGE(http://img.pokemondb.net/sprites/black-white/anim/normal/plusle.gif)

Nah, it is Tendrils of Corruption and ritual spells.
"I think me going Bang bang bang I win is pretty intuitive" Mafia Record: Wouldn't you like to know? 2011 Mafia Awards - Mastermind of the Year
mymoment
\
57817638 wrote:
58060728 wrote:
88318561 wrote:
58060728 wrote:
Moriok Rigger does absolutely nothing to boost other riggers. You are incorrect.
Moriok Rigger is not a Rigger in print. Only in Errata WHAT NOW! (yes, I did put that phrase in for that exact reason)
Congratulations, they have activated your trap card!
Immovable Object Enchantment During your declare blockers step, creatures lose all abilities until after blockers are declared.



Wording is off. "Your declare blockers step"? Within the rules, I guess it would be declare blockers step during your turn, which, I think, isn't what you're after. I guess it should be worded "your opponents' declare blockers step". Thought if you want to use 'lose', this needs to be "at the beginning of [your opponents'] declare blockers step". It has another problem: Blockers are declared before this gets to stack.

Tldr: I'd suggest "Attacking creatures your opponents control have no abilities during combat."
Accidents happen on purpose I am Red/White
I am Red/White
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.
That would be overpowered.

What about "at the end of your opponent's declare attacker's step, creatures lose all abilities until after the next time blockers are declared." ?

Btw, plummet is horrible.
Creatures you control may block as though attacking creatures didn't have any abilities.

Stop with the losing abilities nonsense.

Yxoque wrote:
This forum can't even ****ing self-destruct properly.

IMAGE(http://img.pokemondb.net/sprites/black-white/anim/normal/plusle.gif)

but the quality of a design is directly proportional to the awkwardness of the wording
192884403 wrote:
firstrike
56965458 wrote:
97820278 wrote:
56965458 wrote:
97820278 wrote:
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
Attacking creatures becomes creature with no abilities.
That wording kills most */* creatures.

Is "evasion ability" a valid term? If it is, maybe you should use that.
"The body is but a vessel for the soul, a puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny. And lo, the body is not eternal, for it must feed on the flesh of others, lest it return to the dust from whence it came. Therefore must the soul deceive, despise and murder men."The Durai Papers

I was making fun of someone with bad wording who likes chips.
That wording kills most */* creatures.



It doesn't, because you won't attack with them.

Mown, if "losing abilities" is nonsense, why did Wizards use it? Hmmmmm? 
That wording kills most */* creatures.


Mown, if "losing abilities" is nonsense, why did Wizards use it? Hmmmmm? 


Source on that if you don't mind.
One that doesn't assign a p/t value.

Yxoque wrote:
This forum can't even ****ing self-destruct properly.

IMAGE(http://img.pokemondb.net/sprites/black-white/anim/normal/plusle.gif)

Hammerheim, Shelkin Brownie, Soul Sculptor, Tolaria, Yixlid Jailer

Aside from those, why are you not taking into account cards that set p/t? 
None of those count as they are changing them into something else, or super anciently old.
That wording kills most */* creatures.



It doesn't, because you won't attack with them.

Mown, if "losing abilities" is nonsense, why did Wizards use it? Hmmmmm? 

Nah, I mean the wording in the OP.
"The body is but a vessel for the soul, a puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny. And lo, the body is not eternal, for it must feed on the flesh of others, lest it return to the dust from whence it came. Therefore must the soul deceive, despise and murder men."The Durai Papers

Humble, Ovinize, Snakeform, Turn to Frog all state lose all abilities. But they also assign a new p/t. So I think lose all abilities isn't nonsense. It just needs a p/t condition.
Hammerheim, Shelkin Brownie, Soul Sculptor, Tolaria, Yixlid Jailer

Aside from those, why are you not taking into account cards that set p/t? 


Because rules aren't made around sensible plays, and needs to work when you choose to attack with a creature with characteristic defining abilities.

Yxoque wrote:
This forum can't even ****ing self-destruct properly.

IMAGE(http://img.pokemondb.net/sprites/black-white/anim/normal/plusle.gif)

They do work. By killing them.
This could be green white.



Or just white.
139359831 wrote:
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
---- Autocard is your friend. Lightning Bolt = Lightning Bolt