stuck in a sticky situtation

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
Okay a little backgrond info my group is playing a game where my charater is a sword mage and the youngest son of a noble family in a cityy that outlaws magic to the point if any one other than my friends found out i use magic lets say i'm essentially burned at the stake.(great for meFrown)( i'm also an evil character ) and our cityy is at war with 2 other citty nations. there is a third city state that allows magic and at one point a great archmage lead them to conquest but was beatten back(hence why magic is out lawed) recently our city was under attack from one of the other two nations and we won and my character is now married to a member of the royal family. 

My character is motivated to become the next arch mage and gain as much power as possible and being evil my character would be willing to do almost anything to get what he wants.

so my question is what is a better option for me should i stay with this city and attempt to convert it to magic loving or should i betray this city and swear alegence to the citystate of magic? or if you have any other ideas i'd love to hear some i'm not much of a tactical thinker.
Based on what you've said here, I would betray the starting city if I were in your shoes.  You've stated you have an evil character living in a city that would kill you for what you are.  As such, I see no reason why you would have any loyalty or even any want to see the city survive.  I would do my best to betray the city to one of the others, with the additional possibility of being named the new leader of the conquered city(under the new ruling city, of course) if you could swing it.  How long you stay loyal to the new conquering city would depend on how well you're treated there.  If you don't want to be a leader under the new city, even if you're just acting the part, then the second choice would be to betray the city and watch it get destroyed.
oh thats a good idea
What kind of game is your DM running? Is it an anything-goes set-up, or is there a storyline in mind? It makes a big difference between a shades-of-grey campaign and you being the odd man out in a forces-of-good game.

What is the rest of the group like? I know your character is evil, but what about the others? Are they productive contributors to good, acting out of self-interest, loyal to the city, etc? What would their reactions be to you attempting to screw over your native city - support, indifference, or hostility?

I ask because I can't tell if you've actually mentioned your hopes to your DM. If s/he has plans that run contrary to your own, then you might find your ideas of betraying the city or usurping power will be dashed. If your DM isn't comfortable with you doing something, it's probably not going to happen, especially if you try to spring something on your DM.
My Sig
Reality is but the sum total of all illusions. Proud Hand of Karsus, now and forever Mess with one Hand, mess with 'em all I am Blue/Green
I am Blue/Green
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.
"just do what LM the lord of magical might does, and you'll be fine" - sfdragon, 10/12/09
Board Snippets
147048523 wrote:
"I don't like X, they should remove it." "I like X, they should keep it." "They should replace X with Y." "Anybody that likes X is dumb. Y is better." "Why don't they include both X and Y." "Yeah, everybody can be happy then!" "But I don't like X, they should remove it." "X really needs to be replaced with Y." "But they can include both X and Y." "But I don't like X, they need to remove it." "Remove X, I don't like it." Repeat. Obstinance?
56790678 wrote:
Until you've had an in-law tell you your choice of game was stupid, and just Warcraft on paper, and dumbed down for dumber players who can't handle a real RPG, you haven't lived. You haven't lived.
56902498 wrote:
Lady and gentlemen.... I present to you the Edition War without Contrition, the War of the Web, the Mighty Match-up! We're using standard edition war rules. No posts of substance. Do not read the other person's posts with comprehension. Make frequent comparison to video games, MMOs, and CCGs. Use the words "fallacy" and "straw man", incorrectly and often. Passive aggressiveness gets you extra points and asking misleading and inflammatory questions is mandatory. If you're getting tired, just declare victory and leave the thread. Wait for the buzzer... and.... One, two, three, four, I declare Edition War Five, six, seven eight, I use the web to Go!
57062508 wrote:
D&D should not return to the days of blindfolding the DM and players. No tips on encounter power? No mention of expected party roles? No true meaning of level due to different level charts or tiered classes? Please, let's not sacrifice clear, helpful rules guidelines in favour of catering to the delicate sensibilities of the few who have problems with the ascetics of anything other than what they are familiar with.
56760448 wrote:
Just a quick note on the MMORPG as an insult comparison... MMORPGs, raking in money by the dumptruck full. Many options, tons of fans across many audiences, massive resources allocated to development. TTRPGs, dying product. Squeaking out an existence that relys on low cost. Fans fit primarily into a few small demographics. R&D budgets small, often rushed to market and patched after deployment. You're not really making much of an argument when you compare something to a MMORPG and assume people think that means bad. Lets face it, they make the money, have the audience and the budget. We here on this board are fans of TTRPGs but lets not try to pretend none of us play MMORPGs.
90571711 wrote:
Adding options at the system level is good. Adding options at the table level is hard. Removing options at the system level is bad. Removing options at the table level is easy. This is not complicated.
57333888 wrote:
112760109 wrote:
56902838 wrote:
Something like Tactical Shift is more magical than martial healing.
Telling someone to move over a few feet is magical now? :| I weep for this generation.
Given the laziness and morbid obsesity amongst D&Ders, being able to convince someone to get on their feet, do some heavy exercise, and use their words to make them be healthier must seem magical.
158710691 wrote:
D&D definitely improves mental health; Just as long as you stay away from these forums ;)
Sign In to post comments