if i make a centaur pc and take mounted feats like spirited charge do i count as mounted or not?(i am half horse)
Prerequisites: Ride 1 rank, Mounted Combat, Ride-By Attack.
Benefit: When mounted and using the charge action, you deal double damage with a melee weapon (or triple damage with a lance).
Special: A fighter may select Spirited Charge as one of his fighter bonus feats.
you can start with Spirited charge and make damage X3 with a lance in a charge but maybe you will have a lot of difficulties in dungeon and places to mediums and a lot to escape from a pit of 30Fts
Races of Faerun is 3.5
Races of Faerun is 3.5I just checked, and it's from March 2003, which means it is 3.0, not 3.5...
is 3.5 read the monster description and skills all are 3.5look for the DR of the Lycansthropes that is /silver.
remember that this book is for the faerun set not the standard D&D core set and is complies under the 3.5 rules.
remember that this book is for the faerun set not the standard D&D core set and is complies under the 3.5 rules.I'm not saying it's not compatible with 3.5, just that some DMs might not allow it due to it technically being 3.0... Some DMs are just like that... *shrugs*
the guide itself say that is 3.5(in a time where they do not exist as such hence dont say that is 3.5) more that book of vile darkness that is need in 3.5 (and many book of 3.5 need it).
the guide itself say that is 3.5(in a time where they do not exist as such hence dont say that is 3.5) more that book of vile darkness that is need in 3.5 (and many book of 3.5 need it).While it does say that it complies with the revised core books, that doesn't mean that it's fully 3.5. It states that 'Some rules revisions have been included in this product...'; this means that it's probably closer to 3.25 (if it existed) than a full 3.5 (which started in July 2003, a full 4 months after the book was released).
They didn't publish things using the 3.5 rules because those rules were published yet. If they had published the book under 3.5 before 3.5 was released, they would by default be leaking content before release date. Something most people try not to do. Its 3.0.
On topic. IIRC there is no official ruling on centaurs and counting as mounted, so they don't. I think its strongly implied that you should house rule them as counting as mounted or unmounted whenever it makes the most sense.
I wouldn't go so far as to give mounted combat as written to them, but I would let them qualify for mounted feats without it. I also wouldn't let them use ride checks to negate their AC if they took the feat and weren't mounted on another animal somehow. (snake or something?). Same for mounted archery. No penalty, because they aren't actually mounted. That said, they can move like normal and shoot a bow. I'd probably have to evaluate everything on a case by case basis. If its something that clearly is designed to function for someone on a horse, or something no. If its something else sure. Stuff like counting as your own paladin mount? no.
"In a way, you are worse than Krusk" " As usual, Krusk comments with assuredness, but lacks the clarity and awareness of what he's talking about"
"Can't say enough how much I agree with Krusk" "Wow, thank you very much"
"Your advice is the worst" "I'd recommend no one listed to Krusk's opinions about what games to play"