## Representing insane numbers, and not pissing people off / arguing over stupid things?

24 posts / 0 new
So I have thrown together a red/blue deck that uses the Basalt Monolith/Power Artifact combo for infinite mana.  In my deck there are tons of burn spells with X costs that directly translate into player damage.  Through testing it, optimally, I can get the combo going and potentially kill my opponent on my 3rd turn, though anywhere between my 4th and 6th is where the win falls.

Anyways, as you know I can potentially ram up the colorless mana insanely, but with that I have hit a question:

Given that a googolplexian is the largest integer number with a name mathematically before hitting Graham's Numbers, I can ramp up to 999 googolplexian, but say for ****s and giggles I wanted to go above that, do you think anyone would REALLY have a problem, in a casual setting of course, in representing things above 999 googolplexian as "a thousand googolplexians," "a googolplexian googolplexian," "one hundred thousand googolplexians," etc?  [kinda how 1,000,000 looks like you could say it as "a thousand thousands" [even if grammatically incorrect]]?
mazca
Joined Dec 1969
Once you start dealing in numbers like googolplexes (10^(10^100)) that can't even be usefully represented outside of scientific notation, I don't think anyone really cares! I can't really think of anything in Magic where making 999(10^(10^100)) mana is any more necessary than making, say, 20 billion mana or some other large amount. If I happen to generate an unbounded number of mana or creatures, I generally just say "I Fireball you for an arbitrarily large number. Are you going to do anything about it?". Generally it's not necessary to even specify the number unless someone else is doing something infinitely.

There's nothing grammatically incorrect about saying "a thousand thousands", it's just inelegant... in the same way there's nothing grammatically incorrect about saying "a googolplex googolplexes". If your casual group is willing to tolerate you using unnecessarily large numbers to sound smug, who's going to stop you? ;)
Rules Advisor. Used to play a lot of old Extended tournaments, now I just play prereleases and casual kitchen-table games with friends. My regular decks, many of which have been evolving for years: Contested Cliffs Beasts Coastal Piracy Hana Kami Spirit recycling Rout Multiplayer control Seizan, Perverter of Truth Commander
Nobody cares.
GoTexans
Joined Dec 1969
Deal 100 damage and call it gg.
True post count: 9,900 Thanks Wotc for not counting archived posts. If I post without capital letters than means I'm posting from my phone. For some reason it hates typing capital letters. Go_Texans on MTGO. Texans 12-4 Wildcard: W Texans 19 Bengals 13 Divisional: L Texans 28 Patriots 41 Another awesome season!
LMTRK
Joined Dec 1969
I would let them choose a number, and then deal that many million damage. Or deal damage equal to their birthdate, or the shop's phone number or something.

~ Tim
Reached DCI Rating 1800 on 28/10/11. :D
Sig
56287226 wrote:
190106923 wrote:
Not bad. But what happens flavor wise when one kamahl kills the other one?
Zis iz a sign uf deep psychological troma, buried in zer subconscious mind. By keelink himzelf, Kamahl iz physically expressink hiz feelinks uf self-disgust ova hiz desire for hiz muzzer. [/GermanPsychologistVoice]
56957928 wrote:
57799958 wrote:
That makes no sense to me. If they spelled the ability out on the card in full then it would not be allowed in a mono-black Commander deck, but because they used a keyword to save space it is allowed? ~ Tim
Yup, just like you can have Birds of paradise in a mono green deck but not Noble Hierarch. YAY COLOR IDENTITY
56287226 wrote:
56888618 wrote:
Is algebra really that difficult?
Survey says yes.
56883218 wrote:
57799958 wrote:
You want to make a milky drink. You squeeze a cow.
I love this description. Like the cows are sponges filled with milk. I can see it all Nick Parks claymation-style with the cow's eyes bugging out momentarily as a giant farmer squeezes it like a squeaky dog toy, and milk shoots out of it.
56287226 wrote:
56735468 wrote:
And no judge will ever give you a game loss for playing snow covered lands.
I now have a new goal in life. ;)
At 9001, people start being memetic. After that, it doesn't matter.
139359831 wrote:
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
---- Autocard is your friend. `Lightning Bolt` = Lightning Bolt
It's just...I want to clarify that my means of represnting suck obscene nos. would be gramatically correct, cause I know people sometimes get very pissy when they feel like somebody they're facing is making stuff up.
MoiMoi
Joined Dec 1969
If you used googol as your ammount of mana, I'd mana leak the hell out of you as you cast your X cost spell and I'd argue with you untill you die or give up because you didnt have a googol and 3. You want to know why I'd argue with you untill you give up? Because I think that anyone that doesnt say infinite mana, instead using a term that not everyone might know or understand, is a pretentious jerk.

So how about you just say infinite mana like everyone else?
I love trolls Dont hate me because I'm blunt and you cannot handle it
I'll just make 2 googol mana and use 1 googol for X
happy?
proud member of the 2011 community team

So how about you just say infinite mana like everyone else?

Can't. The rules clearly state that if you have a loop which generates an arbitrarily large amount of resources or actions, you must specify a non-infinite number.

I've even had judges ask me how many times I want to complete an arbitrary loop at a 5k, and declared that I had that much mana.
Etiamnunc sto, etiamsi caelum ruat.
If you used googol as your ammount of mana, I'd mana leak the hell out of you as you cast your X cost spell ...

Got plenty of counters for that, I am runing red-blue after all.  :P

So how about you just say infinite mana like everyone else?

Need a inite number.

I miss mana burn. There's an old story about some guy who ramped up to a million mana but then could only spend it in increments of 3 or something, and died to mana burn.

Just use a limit for god's sake and let them concede. Much easier than coming up with real numbers.

3,000th post: September 5, 2010 4,000th post: March 24, 2012 Winner of the YMTC Ravnica War of the Guilds contest as guild Dimir.

Snapcaster Mage is the best card of all time. How do you deal?

RPJesus
Joined Dec 1969

So how about you just say infinite mana like everyone else?

Can't. The rules clearly state that if you have a loop which generates an arbitrarily large amount of resources or actions, you must specify a non-infinite number.

I've even had judges ask me how many times I want to complete an arbitrary loop at a 5k, and declared that I had that much mana.

The question is in a casual setting, in which case it's perfectly acceptable to say "fireball you for enough." and "enough" is understood as the colloquial term for "A number such that unless you can prevent an infinite amount of damge, you're going to die." Hell it's probably preferred, seems less male reproductive organish than busting out the graphing calculator.
Zammm = Batman. Bronies unite. "I'd call you a genius, but I'm in the room."
It's my sig in a box
58280208 wrote:
Everything is better when you read it in Bane's voice.
192334281 wrote:
Your human antics and desire to continue living have moved me. Just kidding. You cannot move me physically or emotionally. Wall humor.
57092228 wrote:
Copy effects work like a photocopy machine: you get a copy of the 'naked' card, NOT of what's on it.
56995928 wrote:
Funny story: InQuest Magazine (I think it was InQuest) had an oversized Chaos Orb which I totally rooked someone into allowing into a (non-sanctioned) game. I had a proxy card that was a Mountain with "Chaos Orb" written on it. When I played it, my opponent cried foul: Him: "WTF? a Proxy? no-one said anything about Proxies. Do you even own an actual Chaos Orb?" Me: "Yes, but I thought it would be better to use a Proxy." Him: "No way. If you're going to put a Chaos Orb in your deck you have to use your actual Chaos Orb." Me: "*Sigh*. Okay." I pulled out this huge Chaos Orb and placed it on the table. He tried to cry foul again but everyone else said he insisted I use my actual Chaos Orb and that was my actual Chaos Orb. I used it, flipped it and wiped most of his board. Unsurprisingly, that only worked once and only because everyone present thought it was hilarious.
My DM on Battleminds:
no, see i can kill defenders, but 8 consecutive crits on a battlemind, eh walk it off.
144543765 wrote:
195392035 wrote:
Hi guys! So, I'm a sort of returning player to Magic. I say sort of because as a child I had two main TCG's I liked. Yu-Gi-Oh, and Pokemon. Some of my friends branched off in to Magic, and I bought two pre-made decks just to kind of fit in. Like I said, Yu-Gi-Oh and Pokemon were what I really knew how to play. I have a extensive knowledge of deck building in those two TCG's. However, as far as Magic is concerned, I only ever used those two pre made decks. I know how the game is played, and I know general things, but now I want to get in the game for real. I want to begin playing it as a regular. My question is, are all cards ever released from the time of the inception of this game until present day fair game in a deck? Or are there special rules? Are some cards forbidden or restricted? Thanks guys, and I will gladly accept ANY help lol.
I have the same problem with women.
117639611 wrote:
198869283 wrote:
Oh I have a standing rule. If someone plays a Planeswalker I concede the game. I refuse to play with or against people who play Planeswalkers. They really did ruin the game.
A turn two Tibalt win?! Wicked... Betcha don't see that everyday.
Is this my new ego sig? Yes it is, other Barry
57461258 wrote:
And that's why you should never, ever call RP Jesus on being a troll, because then everyone else playing along gets outed, too, and the thread goes back to being boring.
57461258 wrote:
See, this is why RPJesus should be in charge of the storyline. The novel line would never have been cancelled if he had been running the show. Specifically the Slobad and Geth's Head talkshow he just described.
57461258 wrote:
Not only was that an obligatory joke, it was an on-topic post that still managed to be off-topic due to thread derailment. RP Jesus does it again folks.
92481331 wrote:
I think I'm gonna' start praying to Jesus... That's right, RPJesus, I'm gonna' be praying to you, right now. O' Jesus Please continue to make my time here on the forums fun and cause me to chuckle. Amen.
92481331 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
It was wonderful. Us Johnnies had a field day. That Timmy with the Grizzly bears would actually have to think about swinging into your Mogg Fanatic, giving you time to set up your silly combo. Nowadays it's all DERPSWING! with thier blue jeans and their MP3 players and their EM EM OH AR PEE JEES and their "Dewmocracy" and their children's card games and their Jersey Shores and their Tattooed Tenaged Vampire Hunters from Beverly Hills
Seriously, that was amazing. I laughed my *ss off. Made my day, and I just woke up.
[quote=ArtVenn You're still one of my favorite people... just sayin'.[/quote]
56756068 wrote:
56786788 wrote:
.....would it be a bit blasphemous if I said, "PRAYSE RPJAYSUS!" like an Evangelical preacher?
Perhaps, but who doesn't like to blaspheme every now and again? Especially when Mr. RPJesus is completely right.
56756068 wrote:
I don't say this often, but ... LOL
57526128 wrote:
You... You... Evil something... I actualy made the damn char once I saw the poster... Now you made me see it again and I gained resolve to put it into my campaign. Shell be high standing oficial of Cyrix order. Uterly mad and only slightly evil. And it'll be bad. Evil even. And ill blame you and Lizard for it :P.
57042968 wrote:
111809331 wrote:
I'm trying to work out if you're being sarcastic here. ...
Am going to stop you right there... it's RPJesus... he's always sarcastic
58335208 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
112114441 wrote:
we can only hope it gets the jace treatment...it could have at least been legendary
So that even the decks that don't run it run it to deal with it? Isn't that like the definition of format warping?
I lol'd.
56287226 wrote:
98088088 wrote:
Uktabi Orangutan What the heck's going on with those monkeys?
The most common answer is that they are what RPJesus would call "[Debutantes avert your eyes]ing."
56965458 wrote:
Show
57461258 wrote:
116498949 wrote:
I’ve removed content from this thread because off-topic discussions are a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code here: www.wizards.com/Company/About.aspx?x=wz_... Please keep your posts polite, on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks. You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively. If you wish to report a post for Code of Conduct violation, click on the “Report Post” button above the post and this will submit your report to the moderators on duty.
...Am I the only one that thinks this is reaching the point of downright Kafkaesque insanity?
I condone the use of the word Kafkaesque. However, I'm presentely ambivalent. I mean, that can't be serious, right? We're April 1st, right? They didn't mod RPJesus for off-topic discussion when the WHOLE THREAD IS OFF-TOPIC, right? Right.
57545908 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
Save or die. If you disagree with this, you're wrong (Not because of any points or arguements that have been made, but I just rolled a d20 for you and got a 1, so you lose).
58397368 wrote:
58222628 wrote:
This just won the argument, AFAIC.
That's just awesome.
57471038 wrote:
57718868 wrote:
HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BEAR PRODUCING WORDS OF WILDING?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME?!
That's what RPJesus tends to do. That's why I don't think he's a real person, but some Magic Card Archive Server sort of machine, that is programmed to react to other posters' comments with obscure cards that do in fact exist, but somehow missed by even the most experienced Magic players. And then come up with strange combos with said cards. All of that is impossible for a normal human to do given the amount of time he does it and how often he does it. He/It got me with Light of Sanction, which prompted me to go to RQ&A to try and find if it was even possible to do combat damage to a creature I control (in light that Mark of Asylum exists).
71235715 wrote:
+10
100176878 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
57078538 wrote:
heaven or hell.
Round 1. Lets rock.
56906968 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
143359585 wrote:
Blue players get all the overpowerered cards like JTMS. I think it's time that wizards gave something to people who remember what magic is really about: creatures.
Initially yes, Wizards was married to blue. However, about a decade ago they had a nasty divorce, and a few years after that they began courting the attention of Green. Then in Worldwake they had a nasty affair with their ex, but as of Innistrad, things seem to have gotten back on track, and Wizards has even proposed.
You are my favorite. Yes you. And moments like this make it so. Thank you RPJesus for just being you.
On what flavor text fits me:
57307308 wrote:
Surely RPJesus gets Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius?
56874518 wrote:
First: I STILL can't take you seriously with that avatar. And I can take RPJesus seriously, so that's saying something.
121689989 wrote:
I'd offer you a cookie for making me laugh but it has an Upkeep Cost that has been known to cause people to quit eating.
56267956 wrote:
57400888 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
"AINT NO LAWS IN THE SKY MOTHER****." - Agrus Kos, Wojek Veteran
10/10. Amazing.
Even though it is casual, not all circles are the same - some parts of the casual circle I'm in have fun with it, other parts are more structured and serious.
ArtVenn
Joined Dec 1969
Just sayin', the biggest number of anything that I've ever done, was infinite cubed... Cubed, because all of my slivers had summoning sickness and it took until then for me to be able to attack.  Yes, Infinite stacks of infinitly stacked, infinite slivers.  ∞³ of ∞/∞ Slivers.

When considering the largest number to use in magic, without actually using infinite, I generally use this rule... For damage, consider Sixty (or deck size "D") Times sixteen, times sixteen, plus his or her current life total ("L") and his or her permanent count [c=Claw of Gix]("G"), three times his or her portential mana pool "M" and three times his or her hand size "H".  So typically a minimum of 15360.  The formula is something like (D+(Hx3)+(Mx3)+G)(16x16)+L.  With an average 60 card deck, if a player has had THE BEST LUCK, the largest amount of noninfinite life gain, you should need is 23572.  For mana, generally this number + 4 + the number of lands they have untapped.  For Lifegain, there is no roof. In general something along the size of 23572x17 (400724) should be good.
Show
My Decks http://community.wizards.com/vennsvaults/go/forum/viewcategory/138835/Venns_Vaults My Bronation Station http://community.wizards.com/pony My 1000th post! On Thursday 03/13/2011! Yay St. Patric's day. How to play many other Casual Magic Formats http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29198663/?sdb=1&pg=last#521400213 Many of these were on the Magic Resources Site years ago. It was removed around the time 2HG became a sanctioned format. Purple Work Station http://community.wizards.com/purpleworkstation/go/forum/viewboard
Terti
Joined Dec 1969
I usually fireball people for ten thousand billion million damage.
Show
Obligatory and Preliminary Smiley Reservoir:
Just sayin', the biggest number of anything that I've ever done, was infinite cubed... Cubed, because all of my slivers had summoning sickness and it took until then for me to be able to attack.  Yes, Infinite stacks of infinitly stacked, infinite slivers.  ∞³ of ∞/∞ Slivers..

lol

Walked in  on a game that was alonst ending, with a very similar scenario, which was hilarious to see.

Now, so far as if I ever played competitively, would my means of handling such gargantuine numbers lead to any issues that would ead to a judge getting involved?
I tend to start using Knuth's repeated up-arrow notation.

I'll swing for 2^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^64.

If you're curious how big that number is, it's so large that it can't be expressed in exponents.
Etiamnunc sto, etiamsi caelum ruat.
does anyone really care if your numeric expression is technically accurate? you're much more likely to get into arguments about the existence of googolplexes and such than whether it's technically correct to say "a thousand googolplexes". also note that that's not even wrong because once you're dealing in googolplexes, you're no longer dealing with the three-digit loop we have for lower number classification. a googolplex does not have a number of digits divisible by three, so you've departed from the (X, Xty, Xhundred) sequence anyway.

120.6. Some effects replace card draws.
does anyone really care if your numeric expression is technically accurate? you're much more likely to get into arguments about the existence of googolplexes...

Fortunately, the casual group I play with knows that googolpelxes, googolplexians are real numbers, but I see how that could be a bigger source of arguments.

I guess my concern with representing numbers over googolplexians was that the informal sounding, or odd sounding [to some, anyways] nature of it could get arguments going]
RPJesus
Joined Dec 1969
does anyone really care if your numeric expression is technically accurate? you're much more likely to get into arguments about the existence of googolplexes

I dunno, I think the traits "Knows that gooolplex is a thing." and "Thinks infinity is an actual number." are pretty mutually exclusive, so either way you should be able to effectively achieve the same ends regardless.
Zammm = Batman. Bronies unite. "I'd call you a genius, but I'm in the room."
It's my sig in a box
58280208 wrote:
Everything is better when you read it in Bane's voice.
192334281 wrote:
Your human antics and desire to continue living have moved me. Just kidding. You cannot move me physically or emotionally. Wall humor.
57092228 wrote:
Copy effects work like a photocopy machine: you get a copy of the 'naked' card, NOT of what's on it.
56995928 wrote:
Funny story: InQuest Magazine (I think it was InQuest) had an oversized Chaos Orb which I totally rooked someone into allowing into a (non-sanctioned) game. I had a proxy card that was a Mountain with "Chaos Orb" written on it. When I played it, my opponent cried foul: Him: "WTF? a Proxy? no-one said anything about Proxies. Do you even own an actual Chaos Orb?" Me: "Yes, but I thought it would be better to use a Proxy." Him: "No way. If you're going to put a Chaos Orb in your deck you have to use your actual Chaos Orb." Me: "*Sigh*. Okay." I pulled out this huge Chaos Orb and placed it on the table. He tried to cry foul again but everyone else said he insisted I use my actual Chaos Orb and that was my actual Chaos Orb. I used it, flipped it and wiped most of his board. Unsurprisingly, that only worked once and only because everyone present thought it was hilarious.
My DM on Battleminds:
no, see i can kill defenders, but 8 consecutive crits on a battlemind, eh walk it off.
144543765 wrote:
195392035 wrote:
Hi guys! So, I'm a sort of returning player to Magic. I say sort of because as a child I had two main TCG's I liked. Yu-Gi-Oh, and Pokemon. Some of my friends branched off in to Magic, and I bought two pre-made decks just to kind of fit in. Like I said, Yu-Gi-Oh and Pokemon were what I really knew how to play. I have a extensive knowledge of deck building in those two TCG's. However, as far as Magic is concerned, I only ever used those two pre made decks. I know how the game is played, and I know general things, but now I want to get in the game for real. I want to begin playing it as a regular. My question is, are all cards ever released from the time of the inception of this game until present day fair game in a deck? Or are there special rules? Are some cards forbidden or restricted? Thanks guys, and I will gladly accept ANY help lol.
I have the same problem with women.
117639611 wrote:
198869283 wrote:
Oh I have a standing rule. If someone plays a Planeswalker I concede the game. I refuse to play with or against people who play Planeswalkers. They really did ruin the game.
A turn two Tibalt win?! Wicked... Betcha don't see that everyday.
Is this my new ego sig? Yes it is, other Barry
57461258 wrote:
And that's why you should never, ever call RP Jesus on being a troll, because then everyone else playing along gets outed, too, and the thread goes back to being boring.
57461258 wrote:
See, this is why RPJesus should be in charge of the storyline. The novel line would never have been cancelled if he had been running the show. Specifically the Slobad and Geth's Head talkshow he just described.
57461258 wrote:
Not only was that an obligatory joke, it was an on-topic post that still managed to be off-topic due to thread derailment. RP Jesus does it again folks.
92481331 wrote:
I think I'm gonna' start praying to Jesus... That's right, RPJesus, I'm gonna' be praying to you, right now. O' Jesus Please continue to make my time here on the forums fun and cause me to chuckle. Amen.
92481331 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
It was wonderful. Us Johnnies had a field day. That Timmy with the Grizzly bears would actually have to think about swinging into your Mogg Fanatic, giving you time to set up your silly combo. Nowadays it's all DERPSWING! with thier blue jeans and their MP3 players and their EM EM OH AR PEE JEES and their "Dewmocracy" and their children's card games and their Jersey Shores and their Tattooed Tenaged Vampire Hunters from Beverly Hills
Seriously, that was amazing. I laughed my *ss off. Made my day, and I just woke up.
[quote=ArtVenn You're still one of my favorite people... just sayin'.[/quote]
56756068 wrote:
56786788 wrote:
.....would it be a bit blasphemous if I said, "PRAYSE RPJAYSUS!" like an Evangelical preacher?
Perhaps, but who doesn't like to blaspheme every now and again? Especially when Mr. RPJesus is completely right.
56756068 wrote:
I don't say this often, but ... LOL
57526128 wrote:
You... You... Evil something... I actualy made the damn char once I saw the poster... Now you made me see it again and I gained resolve to put it into my campaign. Shell be high standing oficial of Cyrix order. Uterly mad and only slightly evil. And it'll be bad. Evil even. And ill blame you and Lizard for it :P.
57042968 wrote:
111809331 wrote:
I'm trying to work out if you're being sarcastic here. ...
Am going to stop you right there... it's RPJesus... he's always sarcastic
58335208 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
112114441 wrote:
we can only hope it gets the jace treatment...it could have at least been legendary
So that even the decks that don't run it run it to deal with it? Isn't that like the definition of format warping?
I lol'd.
56287226 wrote:
98088088 wrote:
Uktabi Orangutan What the heck's going on with those monkeys?
The most common answer is that they are what RPJesus would call "[Debutantes avert your eyes]ing."
56965458 wrote:
Show
57461258 wrote:
116498949 wrote:
I’ve removed content from this thread because off-topic discussions are a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code here: www.wizards.com/Company/About.aspx?x=wz_... Please keep your posts polite, on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks. You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively. If you wish to report a post for Code of Conduct violation, click on the “Report Post” button above the post and this will submit your report to the moderators on duty.
...Am I the only one that thinks this is reaching the point of downright Kafkaesque insanity?
I condone the use of the word Kafkaesque. However, I'm presentely ambivalent. I mean, that can't be serious, right? We're April 1st, right? They didn't mod RPJesus for off-topic discussion when the WHOLE THREAD IS OFF-TOPIC, right? Right.
57545908 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
Save or die. If you disagree with this, you're wrong (Not because of any points or arguements that have been made, but I just rolled a d20 for you and got a 1, so you lose).
58397368 wrote:
58222628 wrote:
This just won the argument, AFAIC.
That's just awesome.
57471038 wrote:
57718868 wrote:
HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BEAR PRODUCING WORDS OF WILDING?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME?!
That's what RPJesus tends to do. That's why I don't think he's a real person, but some Magic Card Archive Server sort of machine, that is programmed to react to other posters' comments with obscure cards that do in fact exist, but somehow missed by even the most experienced Magic players. And then come up with strange combos with said cards. All of that is impossible for a normal human to do given the amount of time he does it and how often he does it. He/It got me with Light of Sanction, which prompted me to go to RQ&A to try and find if it was even possible to do combat damage to a creature I control (in light that Mark of Asylum exists).
71235715 wrote:
+10
100176878 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
57078538 wrote:
heaven or hell.
Round 1. Lets rock.
56906968 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
143359585 wrote:
Blue players get all the overpowerered cards like JTMS. I think it's time that wizards gave something to people who remember what magic is really about: creatures.
Initially yes, Wizards was married to blue. However, about a decade ago they had a nasty divorce, and a few years after that they began courting the attention of Green. Then in Worldwake they had a nasty affair with their ex, but as of Innistrad, things seem to have gotten back on track, and Wizards has even proposed.
You are my favorite. Yes you. And moments like this make it so. Thank you RPJesus for just being you.
On what flavor text fits me:
57307308 wrote:
Surely RPJesus gets Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius?
56874518 wrote:
First: I STILL can't take you seriously with that avatar. And I can take RPJesus seriously, so that's saying something.
121689989 wrote:
I'd offer you a cookie for making me laugh but it has an Upkeep Cost that has been known to cause people to quit eating.
56267956 wrote:
57400888 wrote:
56957928 wrote:
"AINT NO LAWS IN THE SKY MOTHER****." - Agrus Kos, Wojek Veteran
10/10. Amazing.
Eh, the 'what is the biggest number I can think of' game gets boring pretty fast. I prefer arbitrarily specific numbers such as 2,446,894,392. Of course that gets boring pretty quickly too, but I don't use infinite combo decks much in casual because they tend to be pretty boring to play with or against once you've seen them do their thing a couple times.
Immature College Student (Also a Rules Advisor)
Eh, the 'what is the biggest number I can think of' game gets boring pretty fast. I prefer arbitrarily specific numbers such as 2,446,894,392. Of course that gets boring pretty quickly too, but I don't use infinite combo decks much in casual because they tend to be pretty boring to play with or against once you've seen them do their thing a couple times.

Hehehheh, if you have a really arrogant player or two who won't stop being pompus pricks, perhaps doing this a few times will make it tiring for them, and shut them up, so it can't be all that bad. :D
Just sayin', the biggest number of anything that I've ever done, was infinite cubed... Cubed, because all of my slivers had summoning sickness and it took until then for me to be able to attack.  Yes, Infinite stacks of infinitly stacked, infinite slivers.  ∞³ of ∞/∞ Slivers.

Oh, you're still on aleph numbers? Thanks to Doubling Season, Ghave, Guru of Spores, Cathar's Crusade, and Parallel Lives, plus any infinite mana combo, I'm in the gimel numbers now. You're infinite, but I'm more infinite.

(Which of course only makes sense in discussion of advanced calculus.)
139359831 wrote:
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
---- Autocard is your friend. `Lightning Bolt` = Lightning Bolt