Is there any class with these features? :)

9 posts / 0 new
Last post
Hey all. I'm looking for a decent damage ranged Striker class with some reasonable push/pull/slide type powers, does one actually exist? The Monk has plenty of slides/pushes but the damage isn't great and I'd prefer ranged.
My backup option is to trawl through the character generator and examine all the powers for particular classes, but I figure that there's no doubt plenty of people out there with the knowledge already
Warlock or correctly-build bow ranger, basically.  Forceful Bow is the enchant to look out for.
Harrying your Prey, the Easy Way: A Hunter's Handbook - the first of what will hopefully be many CharOp efforts on my part. The Blinker - teleport everywhere. An Eladrin Knight/Eldritch Knight. CB != rules source.
Some sorcerer styles can also do this, and the Hunter can slide its RBA target as an at-will, although it's generally limited to one target at a time.
As above, and also Wizard. Anyone who says they're not a Striker when they want to be has never seen a Thunder Blaster in action.
-m4ki; one down, one to go

"Retro is not new. Retro-fit is not new." --Seeker95, on why I won't be playing DDN

|| DDN Metrics (0-10) | enthusiasm: 1 | confidence in design: -3 | desire to play: 0 | Sticking with 4e?: Yep. | Better Options: IKRPG Mk II ||
The Five Things D&D Next Absolutely Must Not Do:
1. Imbalanced gameplay. Any and all characters must be able to contribute equally both in combat and out of combat at all levels of play. If the Fighters are linear and the Wizards quadratic, I walk. 2. Hardcore simulationist approach. D&D is a game about heroic fantasy. I'm weak and useless enough in real life; I play RPGs for a change of pace. If the only reason a rule exists is because "that's how it's supposed to be", I walk. I don't want a game that "simulates" real life, I want a game that simulates heroic fantasy. 3. Worshipping at false idols (AKA Sacred Cows). If the only reason a rule exists is "it's always been that way", I walk. Now to be clear, I have no problem with some things not changing; my issue is with retaining bad idea simply for the sake of nostalgia. 4. DM vs. players. If the game encourages "gotcha!" moments or treats the DM and players as enemies, adversaries, or problems to be overcome, I walk. 5. Rules for the sake of rules. The only thing I want rules for is the things I can't do sitting around a table with my friends. If the rules try to step on my ability to roleplay the character I want to roleplay, I walk. Furthermore, the rules serve to facilitate gameplay, not to simulate the world. NOTE: Items in red have been violated.
Chris Perkins' DM Survival Tips:
1. When in doubt, wing it. 2. Keep the story moving. Go with the flow. 3. Sometimes things make the best characters. 4. Always give players lots of things to do. 5. Wherever possible, say ‘yes.’ 6. Cheating is largely unnecessary. 7. Don't be afraid to give the characters a fun new toy. 8. Don't get in the way of a good players exchange. 9. Avoid talking too much. 10. Save some details for later. 11. Be transparent. 12. Don't show all your cards. Words to live by.
Quotes From People Smarter Than Me:
"Essentials zigged, when I wanted to continue zagging..." -Foxface on Essentials "Servicing a diverse fan base with an RPG ruleset - far from being the mandate for 'open design space' and a cavalier attitude towards balance - requires creating a system that /works/, with minimal fuss, for a wide variety of play styles, not just from one group to the next, but at the same table." -Tony_Vargas on design "Mearls' and Cook's stated intent to produce an edition that fans of all previous editions (and Pathfinder) will like more than their current favourite edition is laudable. But it is also, IMO, completely unrealistic. It's like people who pray for world peace: I might share their overall aims, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for them to succeed. When they talk in vague terms about what they'd like to do in this new edition, I mostly find myself thinking 'hey, that sounds cool, assuming they can pull it off', but almost every time they've said something specific about actual mechanics, I've found myself wincing and shaking my head in disbelief and/or disgust, either straight away or after thinking about the obvious implications for half a minute." -Duskweaver on D&D Next
Warlock or correctly-build bow ranger, basically.  Forceful Bow is the enchant to look out for.

Paragon feat "Flitting Shadows" also enables you to teleport your target by giving up curse dice.  Muy useful.  

At-Will "Eldritch Strike" slides one square with every hit, and that's an MBA - if you have a warlord in the party, you're going to slide people around like a champion curler. 


Yeah. I did just kill your BBEG with a vorpal frisbee. Problem?
Avenger's get a nice bit with overwelming strike, bond of censure, fury's advance, splinter the formation, etc.
As above, and also Wizard. Anyone who says they're not a Striker when they want to be has never seen a Thunder Blaster in action.

Pyromancer is pretty nasty, too.
Warlord -> Arrowhead Commander. 

The Adamant Arrow Student feat gives you a Push 1 on Paint the Bull's Eye, and the Paragon Path makes it into a Push 3 at 16, along with some bonuses for allies for pushing creatures away from them.

Bargle wrote:
This is CharOp. We not only assume block-of-tofu monsters, but also block-of-tofu DMs.

Zelink wrote:
You're already refluffing, why not refluff to something that doesn't suck?
A genesai wizard who takes mark of the storm and elemental empowerment as his first 2 feats is an out of the box great controller/striker when using thunder or lightening powers.