Iaijutsu - a Guide to Alpha-Striking

63 posts / 0 new
Last post

A Guide to Alpha-Striking

Iaijutsu, "the art of drawing your sword and striking with one action",
and also "the art of mental presence and immediate reaction".


Let's storm the main gate... they don't expect that !  --Dwarven battle tactic

1.1 What is Alpha-Striking ?

Alpha-striking is the goal to cripple an emeny before he can do the same to you, thereby avoiding drawn out and costy conflicts.
It is an often proposed tactic on CharOp, but also a controversial topic, because the optimal degree of commitment to that goal is widely disputed. Hence the aim of this guide is not to postulate the one-true-way. It rather will rather inform you about the basic tactics involved, how to translate these into character builds, related complications and exploits and how different grades of commitment will affect your playstyle.
At last you need to know the major drawback of alpha-striking. As resources are naturally limited, those commited to alpha-striking can't be commited elsewhere such as a high level ongoing performance with defense as most notable part. Thus having a solid backup plan is what differentiates good from bad alpha-strikers.

1.2 Why Alpha-Striking ?

As already mentioned the fact that you neutralise your opposition before it can reasonably retaliate can save you a lot of resources, both when building and playing your character. If executed well, alpha-striking not only saves more resources than you invest and thus makes for a better characters, but also is synergetic with itself and up to a certain point grows in power exponentially.
Also... it's great fun to smoke encounters in short order and dictate how fights are played out !

1.3 Reading the Guide

Chapter #2 introduces the basic required stratagems, which are momentum, reconaissance, reliability, divide and conquer vs brute force, hammer vs scalpel and melee vs ranged.
Chapter #3 takes a look at complications that may arise, tactics to improve your performance and miscellaneous tips and tricks.
Chapter #4 discusses what happens when alpha-striking fails and how to enact a good backup plan.
Chapter #5 aggregates that knowledge and puts it into practise, reviewing the contributions of different classes to and the effects of increasing commitment into alpha-striking.
Chapter #6 then shows how alpha-striking affects actual play, ranging from in-play examples to shifts in the meta-game.
Chapter #7 closes the guide as appendix by providing resources for further reading, as well as references and a few organisational and personal remarks.

back to top

2. Basic Stratagems

We already discussed the basic premise of alpha-striking in chapter #1. To realise that strategy you must frontload your ability to bring down the pain. While that may sound simple, translating that into a good character build isn't trivial, and there are some strategical requirements to fulfill and considerations to make to ensure your alpha-striking actually works in practise.


Momentum is about dictating the flow of combat, meaning that you combine your prefered powers into a devastating series of attacks while you deny the enemy the same.
Lacking other parameters that for now relies on winning initiative and using your strong and finely tuned powers early before the enemy can (re)act. In general it could mean setting a classical trap in a valley, but we'll discuss those more specific parameters in chapter #3. Optimising your particular build is beyond the purview of this guide (there are enough good builds and guides available on CharOp), and combining your group into a greater whole first and foremost requires you to communicate with your fellow players - you can find some hints for that in chapter #5.
Benefits: worth at least one extra turn regardless of situation, reasonable competence achievable by everybody
Problems: consistent winning requires high investment, prone to over-investment (eg: winning initiative by +1 or +20 is no different)
Examples: Improved Initiative, Strategist's Epiphany, a Warlord's Combat Leader

Combat Sample
As Mengu accurately describes it:

Momentum is something like the warlock hitting the enemy to lower their AC and grant combat advantage, followed by the Warlord easily hitting the enemy, so everyone gets +5 damage against him, followed by the Invoker who now gives that enemy and one other vulnerable 5 to all damage, while giving the warlord a bonus to his next attack, then the barbarian capitalizes on that, takes the target down, uses Howl of Triumph to lower defense for a bunch of other enemies, and back to the warlock who has the barbarian's and invoker's bonuses to open up on the next target, and after him, the Warlord has some nice bonuses. Momentum carries them forward.


Unless you have abolutely surperior force, you must concentrate your efforts on key targets, which are either low defense / high offense mobs or those that provide crucial buffs and benefits to the other mobs. The rest of the mobs has to be either ignored or at maximum debuffed until they can be dealt with. More detailed information on that topic can be found in my monster handbook.
A relatively easy and consistent to get that information is monster knowledge checks using skills. Another way is usually careful attention to the descriptions of the DM, which often contains important hints. More information can be gain before combat, for example as result of skill challenges, and can also offer opportunities to gain momentum by preparation as discussed in chapter #3. At last having sufficient Perception and Insight minimises the chance of being surprised.
Benefits: low investment for high benefits, can be distributed among the whole group, allows for precise dosage of resources
Problems: neglect can lead to highly dangerous situations (eg: ambushes; waste of force / resources on insignificant enemies)
Examples: skills, Adventurer's Scion background, Alertness


Alpha-striking in general is a high risk / high reward approach. If you succeed you walk away largely unharmed, if you fail you have less than usual resources to fall back onto. Hence you must ensure that your strategies work reliably.
Again postponing specific scenarios until chapter #3, that means that you need either a high to-hit bonus, many attacks that minimise the impact of individual misses, tricks that simply work as effect or some kind of recovery mechanism.
Benefits: valuable beyond alpha-striking
Problems: often hard to achieve or only at the cost of raw power, neglect again leads to dangerous situations due less backup
Examples: Combat Advantage, Leader buffs, Daily powers

Divide and Conquer vs Brute Force

There are two different major approaches concerning how to neutralise mobs. With limited resources you should concentrate making the one or the other work well, but they're not mutually exclusive and in fact synergise very well if responsibilities are distributed among a dedicated group.

Divide and Conquer
You probably won't be able to eleminate all enemies before they can act, thus you instead hinder them using control (action denial, forced movement, debuffs, ...) to break down their force and stop them from gaining momentum on their own. Afterwards dealing with the weakened remainders becomes much easier.
There are multiple ways to achieve that. The best is denying the mobs their actions completely, either by a full stun or a daze or immobilise outside melee distance / line of sight for melee / ranged mobs. If that's not possible secondary measures aim to minimise the impact of the mobs' actions, either by debuffing their attack and damage, by forcing them to suffer reprisal, usually in the form of OAs, or by arranging the battlefield such that their ability to target and such focus fire is limited.
Benefits: even little investment has great impact, works well regardless of enemy composition
Problems: mobs must still be eliminated in some way
Examples: Controllers, Defenders

Combat Sample
Taken straight from my very own Ms. No (a  Psion):

So let's instead assume a more challenging encounter setup. We choose level 16 as middle of our career, but this example works in similar combinations at about any point. As resources we assume just an AP and any encounter resources.

-- 2 Soldiers or Brutes at short range (~5 sq) as blocker
-- 1 Elite Controller at medium range (~10 sq) as main adversary
-- 2 Artilleries at long range (~15 sq) to focus fire

Due having a base skill modifier significantly higher than any usual mob Perception modifier, and the ability to roll twice, it's safe to assume that all our checks succeed.
In case we really must move more than 2 sq and try to hide, we can rely on our Watcher's Signet to counter the penalty.

It's likely that due our high base modifier we'll be the first to act.
No matter if we do or don't, because we're hidden thanks to Reactive Stealth, we won't be targeted as the mobs don't even know that we're there.

Turn 1
(standard) We attack the two Soldiers/Brutes with a 1 PP Dual Hallucination. As result they're slid 3 sq away from our group, slowed, and are at -5 Reflex.
(minor) We activate Mind Shroud to gain full cover (if necessary).
OR (minor) We activate our Watcher's Signet in case any suitable spot is within 3-5 sq.
(move) We move closer and re-stealth.
-> (free) Our Thrall moves 5 sq towards the Elite.
(AP: standard) We use a 4 PP Dual Hallucination on the Elite and one Artillery close to some blocking terrain feature. They're slid 3 sq, slowed, at -2 to attack and dazed as result.
-> (free due AP) The Elite is attacked by our Thrall, who thanks to being very precise and having CA will very likely hit as well, and hence slide it 4 sq adjacent to our Defender.
Summary: Assuming we hit (which is likely thanks to a good attack bonus, CA and targetting Will), the two melee mobs are slowed and out of range, one Artillery is dazed and out of LoS, and the Elite savely dazed and debuffed next to our trusty Defender.

Between Turns
The remaining Artillery will likely try to hit us back, which will easily be negated thanks to (full) cover and an on-demand defense bonus from Intellect Fortress.
The rest of our party has fun murdering the Elite.

Turn 2
(move) Re-stealth thanks to the second round of full cover from Mind Shroud.
-> (free) Our Thrall moves forward to one Artillery to corner it (see below).
(minor) If necessary let our Thrall walk some more.
(standard) A 2 PP Kinetic Trip basically autohits the melee mobs (remember the -5 Reflex defense and our CA), and again slides them 3 sq, slows them and knocks them prone if they move more than 1 sq. As third target we slide the dazed and already closer Artillery next to our Thrall, likely catching it unable to shift away thanks to blocking / difficult terrain. 
Summary: The Elite is well taken care of by the rest of our party, the two melee mobs are still unable to do anything, and one of the two Artilleries is trapped in a corner by our Thrall.

Between Turns
The rest of our team finishes the Elite and starts closing in.
The Artilleries, seeing that the combat is going downhill, focus fire us - we turn invisible thanks to Fade Away, and one Artillery eats a full damage OA from our Thrall, probably blooding it.

Turn 3
(move) Continue closing in and use the invisibility from Fade Away to re-stealth.
(minor) If necessary heal our Thrall with Restore Thrall.
 (standard) We either use a normal Dual Hallucination to pull in, slow and put CA & -2 attack on the remaining two Artilleries...
OR (standard) ... or we help our Defender to hold down the bunched up melee mobs with a 2 PP Dishearten for -7 to their attacks.

Total Summary
The Elite is off the board, both melee mobs now get their first turn against our still fresh Defender, and both Artilleries are debuffed, with one trapped and already bloodied.

Backup Tricks
In case positioning isn't optimal or we miss somewhere, we can rely on Forceful Push. It also can slide the Artillery back next to our Thrall in case we're unlucky with the terrain.
In case we do fluke a stealth attempt we can just use the minor shift 2 from Boots of the Fencing Master to try again.
In case we roll low, Insightful Riposte can still make us hit. We maybe already have a Stone of Spirit / Wind to reroll one bad but important attack, if it's a critical encounter.
If positions or terrain are really bad for us, we can still just bust out one of our Daily Attacks or transport our party with Dimensional Shortcurt to anywhere within 20 sq gain the tactical advantage.

Brute Force
Anything not contributing to killing the mobs ASAP is a wasted resource by this philosophy. Hence everything is focused on dealing damage, and dealing it now! rather than later, only diverting as little as necessary to survive just long enough and being able to engage the enemy. Because if all your enemies are dead, what's left to fear ?
The standard way to do that is to maximise the number of attacks you put out, using powers that grant multiple attacks, non stadard action action attcks and attacks triggered by certain foreseeable events or by your allies. You then increase the damage of each invidiual attack, usually by increasing the static modifiers and in particular exploiting strong short lived buffs and vulnerabilities. All together that creates a multiplactive increase, that can quickly skyrocket your numbers if done right. A less common but still very effective approach is to exploit damaging zones and long distance slides to again achieve multiple damage triggers.
Benefits: dead is the best status condition
Problems: has to reach a minimum treshold to work, more susceptible problems due specific encounter / mob setups
Examples: Leaders, Strikers
Combat Sample
I probably don't need to go into detail here, as building sky-high novas is one of the most common activities on CharOp. Still if you want to find more, read this optimised party example by Nelphine or just browse the DPR Kings thread.

Hammer vs Scalpel

Again we have two different ways to approach alpha-striking. They can work together, but don't really synergise and more pick up the slack of the other if combined.

If you apply extreme force, why not apply it to many targets at once if it can be done at only little cost ? Thereby can probably blow up an encounter in one go, and even if you might not neutralise a specific target, something will get hit hard.
Benefits: devastating effect if done successfully, can deal well with numerically surperior enemies
Problems: all or nothing approach, dependent on favourable encounter and mob setup (excluding a few specific tricks), little selective targetting
Examples: Sorcerers, damage focused Wizards & Invokers

Combat Sample
(free) Stalker Shaman summons his Spirit using Sudden Call
(std) Call to the Blood Dancer using tricks like Elven Accuracy or Memory of a Thousand Lifetimes to ensure a hit
(move) position Spirit
(minor) Call Forth the Spirit World to prepare debuffs

(move) Fighter gets into position adjacent to Spirit
(minor) Battle Fury Stance
(std) Come And Get It to pull in three mobs
(AP std) Sweeping Blow
    m . .
m F Sp
m . .

(move) Sorcerer gets into position adjacent to Spirit and the readily lined up mobs
(std) Crushing Sphere
(AP std) Flame Spiral
    m . .
m F Sp
m S .

Now all the mobs have recieved up to five instances of damage, depending on hits. Considering all the damage bonuses (Battle Fury Stance, Sorceror Str/Dex, Int from Shaman, Int again from Shaman vs bloodied) and the fact that crits happen on 18-20, it is very likely that at least one mob is down.
Any other mob is marked by the Fighter, and at -4 to attacks (-2 from Shaman, -2 from Sorcerer).

Eliminating all enemies right away might not be feasable, but by concentrating your efforts you can take out high value and key targets and quickly decimate the enemy so it poses little threat.
Benefits: reliable, flexible
Problems: lower return of investment
Examples: Rangers, Rogues, Avengers
Combat Sample
(std) Wrath Invoker uses Thunder of Judgement to round up and Daze mobs
(AP std) Lightning's Revelation lowers defenses

(move) Melee Ranger moves adjacent to the mobs
(std) Lashing Leaves for extra damage
(minor) Off-Hand Strike
(AP std) Twin Strike
(-- interrupt) Disruptive Strike as it comes up

(move) Brutal Rogue moves adjacent to the mobs
(std) Circling Predator and get into flank
(minor) Low Slash and slide to seperate target
(AP std) Riposte Strike getting Sneak Attack again due Slaying Action
(-- interrupt) Riposte getting Sneak Attack again as it's another turn

-- switch to secondary and tertiary targets as the mobs die --

Considering the attack bonuses granted by the Invoker, the fact that due Daze the targets can't use triggered defenses, and the multiple attacks and bonuses from Lashing Leaves, this should easily kill an Elite or two regulars. Any still standing mob is dazed.

Melee vs Ranged

At last there's the decision between a melee and a ranged approach. For a particular character you usually have to choose either one, but as a group you can employ both with relative ease. They combine quite effortlessly, and while focussing on one can offer somewhat higher synergy, it also becomes much more vulnerable to specific counters.

Getting right in the face of the mob with a nasty weapon is a classic strategy to make it go down fast or just stop anything left from gaining momentum. While there are many benefits, in particular in concert with Leaders, and it allows for an easy gradual investment, being denied melee can bring your effectiveness down to almost zero.
Benefits: higher base damage, better for granted attacks, threatens with OAs
Problems: requires good mobility to reach targets, more prone to reactive abilties
Examples: Melee Rangers, Barbarians, Defenders

Nuking targets from range is often more connected with prolonged and tactical play. But with the right investments you can become highly efficient at alpha-striking as well while still keeping your flexibility. But when things go downhill you tend to suffer more.
Benefits: more flexible targetting and focus fire, easier access to multi-target and control attacks
Problems: usually less resilient, higher investment needed for good performance and against all contingencies
Examples: Archer Rangers, most Warlocks, most Controllers

back to top

3.1 Complications

There are a number of circumstances outside your own control that make alpha-striking difficult. While complications are to be expected, and for other strategies might just be a nuisance, the repercussions for alpha-striking are far more severe. We already learned that alpha-striking puts many resources into overcoming the enemy before it can retaliate, so it is obvious that if these resources are neutered, the combat is going to be difficult.
Hence it is prudent to both know possible complications as well as preparing measures to overcome them. While groups with low investment into alpha-striking (see chapter #5) possibly can't prepare for all these contingencies, they can on the other hand well get away with a regular fight much better due lower reliance on the alpha-strike. Groups with high investments on the hand need to prepare for as many as possible situations, because the lack of such will force them increasingly often into ever more nasty anti-encounters, which can easily wipe them.
On the bright side, some of these circumstances can also be set-up by players with the right resources or just creativity, and thereby can stop mobs from alpha-striking you !

Distance and Terrain

The most obvious problem is relying on melee (or short distance) attacks and starting far away from the enemy. It becomes even worse if the terrain in between is difficult terrain, completely unpassable like a chasm or 3D with targets high above you.
The opposite might be not as bad, but still can hurt you. If you use ranged attacks, but mobs have cornered you, you'll eat OAs and not be able to attack your favourite target like usual.
Countermeasures: Athletics, general mobility, defense buffs


Usually mobs won't do you the favour and put the most vulnerable mob right at the front. Instead you can expect Artilleries who focus fire and Controllers who deny your actions to be well protected behind sturdy melee heavy hitters. So if you can hit key targets at all, you will usually suffer OAs.
Furthermore they usually don't clump together, except when ganging up on one of your party, so AOEs will rarely hit more than one or two targets, lest they are big bursts.
Countermeasures: control (forced movement, daze), mobility / range

Line of Sight / Effect

Battlefield feature more obstacles than just those restricting movement. Bad vision, cover and the like can seriously hamper your ability to use your ranged powers. Worse mobs might simply attack and then move into total cover, leaving you with no way at all to hurt them.
On the bright side this is something you often can employ yourself with relative ease and smart use of the terrain, and thereby gives you the means to apply divide and conquer without any investment into it. Dedicated Controllers (like a Wizard with Firewall) are naturally even better at it.
Countermeasures: area attacks, enhanced vision, penalty negators, mobility (to close in)

Traps and Hazards

Alpha-striking relies on overcoming the enemy before it can gain momentum. But traps and hazards are triggered, thus always ready, and often cannot be overcome by classic means of damage or control. But their potentially high damage and usually attached control riders can completely negate your own momentum, if they catch you unprepared or unable to get around them.
Countermeasures: good skills (percieve / diffuse: Arcana, Perception, Thievery; circumvent: Athletics / Acobatics), mobility, specialised powers

Minions and Swarms

When you're all set and ready to perfectly flurry down some tough mobs, a horde of weak enemies shouldn't pose a problem to you, now should they ? But in fact they do. The problem is that many alpha-strikes rely on high damage attacks (doesn't matter against minions, as long as you hit them) and powers to flurry against one target (which is moot against many weak opponents). And Minions are very much a DM's alpha-striking weapon, because even if they die quickly, their sheer mass can easily overwhelm a character or two, particularly if they are less resilient like the usual alpha-striker.
While Swarms are a single entity gamewise, they not only look similar to Minions, but they also behave such. They as well are resilient to standard single target damage, and they often generate more attacks (for example through Auras) than regular mobs, too.
Countermeasures: area powers (aka the hammer approach), auto-damage effects, damage resistance

Out Of Turn Monster Powers

It's all nice and dandy to buff up, move into position and then flurry that BBEG to death with twenty attacks... just to find out it has a reactive ability to teleport, become insubstantial or stun you. Sometimes these abilities can be shut down, but even if not, being aware of them spares you from expending valuable resources for no effect.
Countermeasures: daze / stun, monster knowledge

Alpha-Striking Monsters

Sometimes you get served your own medicine, be it having bad luck with Initiative, being surprised or something else. This is probably the nastiest thing that can happen to you, because as alpha-strikers you're not build to outlast your enemy.
Countermeasures: defense buffs, surprise negators, employing anything mentioned above yourself

back to top

3.2 Improvements

We already discussed the basic requirements to make alpha-striking work, and what decisions you have to make when assembling your party. We then touched on a number of problems you might get into which are not, or only very little, in hands.
Some of the following points were already mentioned as countermeasures to problems, because you naturally like to follow your primary strategy as much as possible before resorting to a backup plan. But by employing the following things you not only minimise problems, but you can enhance your alpha-strike effectiveness in a more general way.
As we'll also see when discussing the backup plan, you don't need all these tricks every encounter, so having a few but potent of them available as daily powers is just fine.


This is the easiest, broadest but as seen in #3.1 complications also most necessary way to enhance your performance, so there's no excuse to not get at least some.
If you're melee focused you'll need it to reach key targets instead of just blocker mobs, as ranged attacker it stops you from getting ganged up, and it allows you to get around all kinds of other problems as well. Hence as long as you can increase your mobility without significantly hurting your base alpha-strike or backup abilities, you should definately do so.
Benefits: overcomes all kinds of complications, improves ability to engage key targets
Problems: prone to many debuffs, catch all solutions are rare
Examples: Athletics (and associated Skill Powers), Boots of the Fencing Master, Striker (for yourself) & Leader (for allys) powers

Defensive Buffs

Not only you will use your most potent attacks as early as possible, but mobs will just do the same if they can. Hence anything to soften the impact of that first barrage is highly useful, particularly if you can trigger it reactively and thus doesn't rely on winning Initiative.
Benefits: comparetively low investment, can serve as backup ability at the same time, useful regardless of circumstances
Problems: even Minors or Immediates might be needed for the alpha-strike, many picks still rely on winning Initiative
Examples: a Halfling's Second Chance, Natural Terrain Understanding, Leader & Defender powers


The epitome of a good alpha-strike is an ambush for complete surprise. Beyond its obvious benefits, it often lets you dictate the circumstances of how the combat is played out. But make sure your trusty Defender or capable Controller is within reach, before you jump headlong into combat and quickly find yourself overwhelmed.
Benefits: grants an extra round, allows uninterrupted buffing, useable as fill-in for things like mobility or defense
Problems: one bad roll can ruin ambushes, hard for everybody to become good, often relies on circumstances out of your control
Examples: high Stealth or Bluff, abilities that grant (total) cover / concealment (like Feytouched Armor), Champion of the Vigil

3.3 Tips & Tricks

Focus Fire
A common mistake is to let serverely hurt targets run off after the alpha-strike. Unless the costs to chase it down or nuke it from range are steep and you can make sure that it won't be able to participate next round, prioritise finishing off any wounded mob. Also don't mind a little overkill, for example better use both Twin Strike attacks and make sure it dies, instead of gambling one of it hitting and the other just grazing an untouched mob.
Combat is most often won by action economy, and alpha-striking is the epitome of denying the enemy actions from the start - don't waste your advantage after the initial strike.

Improving APs
Action Points play a crucial role for successful alpha-strikes. Beyond the simple impact of an extra standard action they allow reaping the benefits of short lived buffs again, and often carry some extra bonuses as well (usually provided by Paragon Paths, some Leaders and some items).
To gain extra APs you may want to look a Symbol of Victory if you can spare the slot (possibly by MCing), Adroit Explorer or Vistani Foresight. Most notable AP improvements for your allies come from Warlords and the Symbol of Daring. At last many Tattoos like Demonskin, Fireheart or Breakchain offer benefits if you expend an AP yourself.

Abusing Crits
A critical hit is another welcome increase to your burst damage. As rule of thumb a crit provides about as much damage as an extra basic attack would do, although that can increase significantly with high-W attacks, powers like Bloodbath or Assassin's Point or other improvements.
The problem is that you usually can hardly count on critting, and even enhancements like Jagged or the Epic mastery feats don't provide enough increase for that. Call to the Blood Dancer, Raise the Stakes, Daggermaster or an Avenger's Oath can increase the chance significantly enough to make it relevant for alpha-striking. At last Divine Oracles, Rrathmals and the power Death from Two Sides can guarantee a crit and thus are very powerful tools. Making a mob helpless using tricks Sleep, Knockout or Mind Blade to follow-up with a CDG, possibly even as multi-attack, gives the same results.
To make the most out of your crits, you will like items like a Ring of Giants or a Rending Axe, Vicious or Bloodiron Weapons and in general any with the High Crit property. To gain a full extra attack Barbarian's Rampage  and Two-Weapon Opening are great, and Righteous Rage of Tempus can turn a crit into a huge amount of damage.

The Bloodied Status
There are a few pieces that rely on your target being bloodied, most notably Gauntlets of Blood, Impending Victory and a Tiefling's Bloodhunt, or unbloodied like the Bleak Disciple Assassin. While theoretically those should apply about half the time, in practise it highly differs based on your role. Benefits against bloodied targets help in that order Strikers, Leaders, Controllers, Defenders due the nature of how work in party is usually shared.
Defensive abilities against bloodied mobs like a Deva's Astral Majesty are usualy less useful, as any bloodied mob should be finished off quickly. Still bloodied mobs, particularly Elites and Solos, often become more dangerous, and for these occasions it's wise to save up a strong power to control or finish the mob quickly as well.
At last effects active while you're bloodied, like a Dragonborn's Fury should be exploited with care, as you usually want to start healing up when you become bloodied to avoid dropping, unless you have special tricks to avoid that. The exception are abilities that boost your resilience like a Longtooth Shifter's Regeneration or a Cloak of the Walking Wounded. If want to trigger these abilities intentionally you can use a Bloodfury or Battlecrazed Weapon. Don't expect things that are only active while unbloodied to work too long either, as becoming bloodied is a common occurance after the first or second round of combat.

Pay Attention
As already discussed in chapter #2, knowledge is a valuable and important resource. But you don't have to rely on just your monster knowledge checks the attain it. Pay attention to the description of the mobs by the DM, remember your experience from previous fights and the surrounding knowledge you already have gathered. Ask for details or if anything is unclear - your characters are there in person and can see, hear, feel and smell all these details plain and easy. From this information alone you often can infer important facts.
The same holds true for the environment of the encounter. No matter if you thereby anticipate traps, find advantagoues spots that for example grant cover, spot lose rocks to reshape the battlefield and attack your enemies with or in general discover ways to make creative use of the environment - all is certainly going to help you to ease the combat.

The Value of Experience
D&D is fairly sophisticated and complicated game. Having a good build and a theoretically good strategy alone doesn't help. It's a widely agreed fact that a medicore build played well is surperior to a good build played poorly.
As alpha-striking is a more complex tactic and a high risk, high reward approach, it is important that you don't jump the gun. Instead of starting with the most twinked out alpha-striker and discovering some crucial build error in the first session, or just finding out about all the complications alpha-striking entails, start slow. Build a character that is solid even in a prolonged combat, despite his alpha-striking ability, and use as many resources that contribute towards both. Feel free to post your build, idea, DM style and group composition and ask for feedback from the community. If you really want to start with a leap, take some of the proven and well optimised builds presented in chapter #5, and make sure you have a good grasp on the particularities of the build and selected one that still employs relatively straight forward tactics.
At last remember that D&D is still a group effort. Alpha-striking in particular is a tactic that the group should pull off together, even if only one or two members contribute to the actual alpha-strike. Following widely different tactical approaches is going to lead to disaster. To avoid that, make sure your friends understand the core idea behind alpha-striking - and to do that they will likely need time, insight and experience.

back to top

4. Having a Backup Plan

Sooner or later you will get into a situation where alpha-striking doesn't work. The reasons can be multifold like simple bad luck with rolls, unfavourable environment, getting ambushed yourself or just not having enough punch to neutralise important enemies - often enough it in fact are multiple of these factors at once.
Now that doesn't mean all is lost, in case you have prepared a good backup plan containing the parts described below. As discussed the limitation of resources means you will have to make trade-offs, but with careful selection and balacing (also see chapter #5) you can become strong enough with both strategies, in particular if you invest into resources that help both your alpha-strike and your backup plan.

The Role of Dailys

As you hopefully shouldn't run into problems every encounter, it's fine to rely on daily powers to improve your performance or be part of the backup plan. Furthermore it's the one way for your backup plan to include adding more oomph to your actual alpha-strike.
Benefits: very effective, can provide encounter long benefits or completely new capabilities, might make the actual alpha-strike work
Problems: highly limited resource, hard to make a build relying on them
Examples: Rain of Steel, Stand the Fallen, Attacks on the Run

Burst Healing

When your alpha-strike fails, at least one member of your party will have taken quite some damage in return. To stop the fight from getting out of hand even further, you'll want to bring him up to solid HP quickly to continue into a regular fight without worries.
Naturally that falls into the purview of Leaders, and their inherent (or MCed) abilities plus any Utilities are well equiped for it, usually recovering between 1/3 and 1/2 of the HP total. But if somebody has taken a big hit, multiple folks took one to the chin or if your main Leader in fact was target of the focus fire, that alone is not going to be enough.
Benefits: quickly recovers people from an onslaught, just as useful in any grind-like fight
Problems: usually Surge intensive, stacked or surgeless heals are hard to get
Examples: Swift Recovery, Dwarven Armor, Reactive Surge

Debuff Negation

A second problem is that during the retaliation you will be subjected to many control effects as well. That means you lose even more momentum while the mobs gain - exactly the situation you wanted to avoid in the first place. And as you level the frequence of debuffs will become much higher.
Ability to quickly overcome such conditions is crucial for performing a smooth transition into a regular fight. While Leaders can help everybody with their powers, this is where Defenders start to shine, as they usually are much harder to disrupt in this manner and thus can cover their allies until they have recovered as well.
Benefits: can spare you many wasted turns, good fall back resource in general
Problems: hard to get for non-Defenders, reliable success requires significant investment
Examples: Grit and Spittle, powers combining attack and mobility, Circlet of Arkhosia

At-Will DPR

Now that your all your cool toys are gone and didn't decimate everything, you still have to bring down the mobs in one way or another - and in the end that means damage. Here the playing field between Strikers and other classes is somewhat more even, but focus fire on anything wounded is still prudent.
Benefits: usually good synergy with nova damage optimisation, can be contributed by everybody
Problems: none !
Examples: Weapon Focus, Frostcheese, Commander's Strike

Basic Resilience

At last a drawn out fight means that you will likely recieve your fair share of attacks. To avoid the common (and usually short lived) phenomenon of a glass-cannon you want to make basic investments in your resilience. Thus you don't become an unnecessary strain on your Leader or force your party to rest early, and good defenses not only make your HP last long enough but avoid nasty riders as well.
Benefits: readily available to everybody, easily improved with items
Problems: desirable investments quickly add up
Examples: Improved Defenses, Toughness, Potion of Regeneration

back to top

5.1 Contributions of Different Roles

By now we have discussed basics of alpha-striking, problems and enhancements as well as the outline of the necessary backup plan. But how does that translate into an actual character to play ?
While there are many classes and even more builds, they're still quite well defined by their role. Hence we'll use this metric to describe the different ways you can contribute to an alpha-strike with your particular character. In this section I'll the examples, because they make more sense in the context of the following section, which deals with the different grades of commitment to such an alpha-strike.


While Controllers seldom end a fight instantenously, they can easily brake it up into smaller and more manegable pieces, that the rest their party then deals with. That obviously is divide and conquer. This usually favours hammer approach to throw out mass debuffs, so the enemy will get slowed down at multiple points, although the ability to reliably remove the most dangerous target from the fight completely is valuable as well. Good Controllers in fact have both in their arsenal by mixing powers, feats and items carefully, so they can adapt to the specific situation.
A few so called Blaster builds instead strongly lean towards brute force, either in the common variant of high damage, multiple target version as hammer, or as scalpel using damage triggers from zones and high distance forced movement. In either case, even if the target survives, it usually is still left in a very bad position and thus little of danger.
The most Controllers work at range, although a few melee or close distance builds exist. They often are expected to clear Minions, but that is more a conincidence than the core of their role - and can be taken care of by many characters in different ways.
Benefits: best to break up encounters with just one character, good complement any party in both alpha-strike and regular fight
Problems: a target cannot be "controlled to death", usually squishy


They are usually the least associated with alpha-striking, because by definition they are needed when the alpha-strike has failed, as their core competence is to stop the enemies from focus firing. While having a dedicated backup character is never a bad idea, with the correct build even Defenders don't need to watch from the sidelines while others have the fun. With the right build they can in fact develop significant competence in a secondary role, most usually as Striker or Controller with little sacrifise. Paired with their innate resilience they can have their rightful place in about any alpha-striking party.
Defenders are almost exclusively melee characters.
Benefits: resilient, good backup, able to provide multiple competences
Problems: can hardly alpha-strike on their own


The least and yet the best role for alpha-striking, there is a reason behind the consensus that no group should go without at least one Leader. On their own they tend to achieve rather little, but they are the grease monkeys that turn a solid group into a real force. Their central contribution to alpha-striking is buffing and enabling to multiply the effectiveness of other party members.
But even beyond the alpha-strike Leaders are a crucial part of any group. Their inherent access to heals and other mitigation abilities make them the core of every backup plan. Individuel fields of expertise of different Leaders naturally vary, and those that are lacking at either usually make up for it with a strong secondary expertise in either controlling or defending.
They usually operate at close range, but you can find everything from melee to long distances abilities in different builds.
Benefits: multiplies effectiveness of other characters, helps with both alpha-strike and backup, very viable to have more than once
Problems: not very effective on his own, weakness to enemy alpha-strikes, must be customised to the individual party for best performance


At last the Striker is the incarnation of the brute force approach. The first requirement every such character has to fullfil is that he brings enough front loaded damage to the table to quickly remove an enemy from the combat. Failure to do that is only acceptable if enough debuffs can by applied in the process as well to ensure the mob is neutralised efficiently. As such they usually work more like a scalpel against the most dangerous target.
Strikers are a very varied group, operating at all ranges, and while often offering secondary capabilities, they have to balance at-will damage, surviability and other tricks carefully.
Benefits: more damage is always good, fit well into any group
Problems: affected most by complications, tend to employ all-or-nothing strategies, hard to balance correctly

back to top

5.2 Finding the Balance

By now you should have a good idea about all the different aspects of alpha-striking. But before turning it into a nice build you have to make one final but very important decision. How much do you want to dedicate yourself - referring both to an individual character as well as a whole party - to alpha-striking ?
Naturally putting more resource into alpha-striking (given that you are smart and do a practical optimisation with complications and different scenarios in mind) will naturally mean that you will pull off an alpha-strike more often and more successful. But on the other hand it will also mean that if you fail to do so, you fail ever so harder.


This in fact means that you make no investments into alpha-striking at all. You instead just recognise the importance of alpha-striking and then smartly use the resources you get anyway (most notably encounter powers and APs) to make one if the opportunity comes up. Every good character should at least achieve this level, because not doing so ignores the realities of combat and leaves useful resources untapped.
No matter if and how well you then can alpha-strike, you are well prepared for the rest of the encounter, as what I have described here as backup plan is in fact your actual plan.
Benefits: comes for free, little chance of wasted investments, automatically has a strong "backup plan"
Problems: potentially misses many relatively good opportunities, no alpha-strike might lead to actually higher resource consumption in play
-- Coach and Little Mac (Seeker|Cleric & Fighter, by ShakaUVM): bring swift lockdown and death to whatever they get their hands on
-- Inexhaustable Dragon Sovereign (Paladin, by Litigation): self sufficient, backup healer and catches the mobs' attention right away
-- Ronin (Battlemind, by myself): mass mob lockdown and swift response to get allys out of trouble
-- The Most Annoying Rogue Ever (by Philip): novas like every Rogue should, but impressively disproves the glass cannon stereotype


Here the fun starts, although it's still a rather conservative approach. Beyond a basic plan you take measures to work around some of the more common complications and make a few choices that are particularly helpful during early combat. In total you invest about one third of your resources into setting-up a good alpha-strike.
Groupwise this often means instead of everybody taking the casual approach, that about half the characters are dedicated alpha-strikers with only basic backup investments while the other half just takes the opportunistic approach, so they can pick up the slack past the first rounds or in unfavourable encounters.
Benefits: highest return of investment ratio, still safe in case of problems
Problems: can't rely on the alpha-strike to work all the time
-- Achilles (Battlemind, by myself): high DPR, high resilience, and able to force mobs away from squishier allies from the start on
-- God's Right Hand Man (Invoker, by Grey_Warden): flexible between defense and offense, and summons can help out in a pinch
-- Master of Puppets (Bard|Warlord, by Dielzen): brings control as he buffs his allies, and makes things flow from the start on
-- Pacifist Cleric (by Nausicaa): control off targets early, keep resource comsumption low and bring emergency buttons for hard encounters
-- Slash & Dash (Ranger, by lordduskblade): solid nova, and then makes the remaining combat easy with high defenses and solid DPR


You believe that alpha-striking is the surperior strategy, and hence you are willing to invest about two thirds of your available resources into making it work. While you naturally prefer those choices that help both short and long term, you only take the best ones to have enough room to make the actual alpha-strike great. That means both accounting for the very most complications as well as bringing a few enhancements to fabricate more frequent and better alpha-strikes.
For a group that rarely means that everybody uses a dedicated build. Instead some characters will follow the all-out strategy with only the most basic investments into longer combats, while one or two characters instead serve as specific backup with rather low contribution to the actual alpha-strike.
Benefits: usually wins the fights right away, very effective if done well
Problems: faces problems in case of more than occasional anti-encounters, requires experience to build and play successfully
-- Killswitch (Warlord|Artificer, by Auspex7): boosts to initiative, movement and attacks, and brings some solid backup tricks as well
-- Ms. No (Psion, by myself): takes mobs out of the fight right away, and has enough tricks to provide solid control all combat long
-- Ninja Team Leader (Rogue|Warlord, by CriticalBastard): high on mobility to strike key targets, and afterwards evade and survive retaliation
-- Oracle of Death (Barbarian, by myself): big opening nova, and solid party support with healing / defending / DPR for the mop-up
-- Stormbringer (Warlord, by lordduskblade): archetypical Warlord, but can also quickly fill holes and grows with the enemie's resistance


This isn't for the faint of heart or the inexperienced, as it takes the stance that what is not invested into killing an enemy is a wasted investments. Hence you put everything towards achieving that goal as quickly as possible, thereby avoiding almost all retaliation and making any defensive investments indeed unnecessary. Furthermore you try to prepare countermeasures to every possible complication. Any long term resources you have are those that you get for free, like basic hit points and proficiencies, at-will powers and selected Utilities.
Benefits: leaves the enemies no chance to retaliate
Problems: can run dry on resources easily in case of problems, highly susceptible to wipe in case of anti-encounters, very complex
-- Gigantor (Ranger, by DamonTor): crit exploitation at its best
-- The Chargers (Barbarian|Warlords, by ShakaUVM): very aggressive to bring down enemies, with still the basic tricks to survive
-- The Timebomb (Ranger, by lordduskblade): a classic example of nova optimisation

back to top

6.1 Actual Play Examples

Auspex7 describes running his Killswitch with a group of CharOp regulars and their builds in an online game.
The first time I took him [Killswitch] out for a spin was with an L16 party, against an L20 encounter that featured two Red Slaad Juggernauts, with all monsters adjusted a la Bilsmode. [Bilsmode is basically a quick hack to adjust MM2 mobs to MM3 guidelines.]

That run featured a Sorc (Lumi), Mr. Smith (LDB), a Taclord/Battlefront Leader (Paladin Online), and Challenger (my build, run by Folarin), plus me on Killswitch.

I went first. Resistive, Reorient, War Master's Assault.

Resistive gave myself and Lumi's Sorc each 38 Temp HP.

Reorient put PO and Folarin into flanking position against one of the two Juggernauts, and Mr Smith adjacent to the other. It also moved Lumi's Sorc into a square adjacent to me.

War Master's Assault put 2 hits into 1 Juggernaut (I missed my RBA, both melee hit), and 2 hits + a mark into the other (LDB and Lumi both hit-- Lumi did so with Energy Strobe, thanks to Spell Commander L16 feature). [Energy Strobe is a RBA anyway.]

Next turn was Folarin's Avenger, who went Oath, Overwhelming Strike (pulling the target 1 square closer to LDB), and then used RRoT to end his turn.

Warlord used Death from Two Sides. Hits from both he and Folarin caused Folarin's hit to be a fully maximized RRoT crit, which left the Elite on its last leg.

LDB's Rain of Steel + Come and Get It then popped a few minions, finished off the nearly dead Elite, and re-marked the one he had originally marked (which he missed with this attack).

After that, when the marked Elite hit LDB, I pasted it with Shocking Feedback.

That was the end of our wave of turns, and we were already in cruise control. We had an Elite down, one marked and hurt, minions popped, etc. Added to this, the 2 'softest' targets on our side were sitting safely at range, with 38 temp HP each.

I went first in that Enc, and all of the monsters were dead before they would have gotten third turns. While I used a Daily to open, it was the only Daily used [Not entirely correct, as Mr. Smith's Rain of Steel is a Daily as well.], and nobody used Action Points.

PhatWOP on Epic tier hammer-type alpha-striking
I receently played an Epic Marathon. Other than myself, there was a Pyromancer Wizie, a Deva Invoker, a Morning Lord Radiant Spammer and a Thunder/Lightning Sorc. In other words, everyone but me was hard in to AoE (2 controllers, Striker, Leader). All 4 of them would literally spend the entire fight attacking pretty much every monster on the board at the same time. If the monsters were spread, the first few would spend their first action grouping them (Thunder Summons, any of a hundred other slide effects, etc). Then they would drop bombs. I am sincere when I say it was the sickest party I have seen at Epic (and I have played several Epic games for the full tier).

We had no defender and you know what, we didn't need one. Any defender would have been dead weight. It was unnecessary, monsters were generally so crippled and dead so fast, there was no way they could generate enough damage to actually necessitate the soft control of a defender.

This was the tactic from level 27 onward. I will list all possibilities, but not all of this needed to be done each fight.

The party was fairly stacked for initiative (especially the controllers) as standard, so one or both, and the sorc would usually beat the monsters.

SOP went something like this. When I say action point, it is not as though we APd every fight, it was more if it was available and smart that fight, then this was the all in move.

1.) Thunder Summons to group the monsters if he is first. That let him resposition 2-3 monsters meaning you now have the group in a pretty tight pack.
2.) Action Point
3.) Any large damaging Thunder/Lightning spell.

He was a fully tripped sorc with DIS and 2 shards as well the full "Gifts for the Queen" set. Note, that because he had the full set, he could switch his lightning damage to radiant, which is relevant for the cleric below.

1.) Soulfire (Enlarged - Area Burst 3) on the now grouped monsters. She had the necessary tools to remove any allies from the burst of course. All monsters are now heavily damaged and weakened.
2.) Action Point
3.) Furnace of Sand (again, we were all at range, so it was rare people were in the burst or zone, this was almost a wholly ranged party) (Enlarged) or if available Prismatic Spray.

She was also fully tripped, DIS, 2 shards, Staff of Ruin, all in fire.

1.) Pure Glow. This obviously almost always hits everyone, sets up Radiant Vulnerability and gigs for another 20 at start of next turn.
2.) Action Point
3.) Healing Torch Again, big radiant and a ridiculous buff to the defenses of all allies in the burst.

The cleric was a morninglord/Radiant one with all the necessary healing acoutrement. He also had the thing that when you crit, you increase the radiant vulnerability of all foes in the area, and with 2 area burst 5 effects, he could easily do that (pushing it to 20 or 30 occasionally).

1.) Bats clean up with any of a host of Radiant Spells or if the battlefield is just TOO large to defy gathering, then he can turn and blast a portion of the battlefield with a big Compel Action to dominate the other side of the battlefield and have them Run screaming (or charging) into the Furnace of Sand blinding zone to feebly attack their friends.

Obviously these tactics can all be mixed and matched and no matter what the order, every character (save the cleric) was built with a subtheme of being able to push/pull/slide "move" mobs so that the AoEs were always having maximum effect.

To the DM's credit, he kept us challenged, which usually meant battles of 15-20 normals, All Elites or Impossibly High Defense swarm minions that were immune to auto-damage.

Our Final battle was against an upped to 30 Elite Foul Chembroul (though I have no idea what the base monster was) and Tiamat (which was Tiamat). We won fairly handily, but not overwhlemingly.

back to top

6.2 Meta-Game Consequences

The application of a different approach compared to the classic slug-it-out combat style also changes the way combat feels and plays. Now that shouldn't come as surprise in general, but there are a few subtle interactions that manifest gradually, and while hard to spot can profoundly impact the course of your campaign.

Walking the Line

It's a trivial observation that a group with well built and played characters can achieve much better results in combat, easily reaching +2 level equivalents. But even beyond that an alpha-striking group also makes the same combats look much easier than they might in fact be. Hence it's prudent to shed some light onto this hidden issue.
For you as players that can lead to several bad judgements, which you should be concious about to avoid them. Firstly as alpha-striking is successful, you tend to invest more and more into it, slowly shifting the balance and neglecting to account for complications or backup. Secondly it becomes harder to judge when to fold and run, because an encounter is too difficult - further amplified by the fact that it often hinges on two or three die rolls for a combat to swing, which you just dare to take instead of making a timely and planned retreat. All together it thus doesn't even take an anti-encounter to lead to a TPK.
The DM faces a similar problem, as he gradually increases difficulty of encounters to give his players a good challenge, due the already discussed fact that alpha-striking makes fights look easy. Owing to a much more narrow tipping point than traditional groups, in particular with usual factors as luck with die rolls and the like, this can lead to a sudden and unexpected TPK. While DMs often have some solid gut instincts for a good fight (like bringing half the characters to bloodied, or at least downing one for a round), these can easily be fooled by alpha-striking - instead the good paramters to observe are offensive resource expenditure (AP, Dailys, player turns) needed to diffuse an encounter, but also a measurement of the mop-up phase (how many rounds the combat lasted after the alpha-strike was over) and the end of day tally of Healing Surges left. At last the DM should be aware what a typical anti-encounter for the group may look like. While its the players' duty to avoid gaping holes, this is another source of unexpected TPKs - a warning shot usually is the better solution here to let the players know of their weaknesses.

Shifting the Paradigm

While people talking of hidden issues should always be a warning sign when buying some fancy new product, these issues are actually not as bad as it sounds when you are aware of them. But even more they present a great chance to improve your D&D experience !
The most obvious benefit is real time, as quicker combats let you wrap up things much faster (up to the point of handwaving the last survivors, maybe for a small fee like a Healing Surge). Now you could just cramp more combats into a session - but why not take the chance and expand on your RP time, and if just to boast with your war stories to impress the local king...
But you can even go a step further towards what is commonly known as sandbox play. While this seems to be at stark contrast to the strictly framed style of D&D, it in fact isn't. If your whole group has a good grasp on the formerly explained pitfalls, you can go ahead and give your DM a free pass. Now you make your own way through the world, and your DM instead just models the challenges you seek as he considers them to be realistic for the world. Overcoming these (for your characters) very real dangers might lead to a quick but also dramatic end if your characters choose to make their stand... or your surperior tactics might well save the day - gloriously !

back to top

7. Appendix

7.1 Further Readings

Generally Useful Resources
-- Damage Calculator (by Calatar): helps you estimate if you will have enough punch with your nova
-- Reservoir Dogs (by myself): discusses monster capabilities, so you know what you will face
-- Swift & Without Mercy (by Auspex7): for an excellent in detail discussion of alpha-striking from the viewpoint of an Avenger

Helpful Tricks
-- Critical Hits (by AA_Metatro): an easy way to big burst damage
-- DPR Kings (by borg285): not technically nova, but still many of the latest knacks to ooze out as much damage as possible
-- Encounter Power Recycling (by ChaosMage): using your best trick more than once is usually worth some effort
-- Let's Accessorize (by Soulliard): takes a glance at items, which let you plug many holes or just improve on damage and skills
-- Optimising Actions (by mellored): because you just never can have enough of those
-- Optimising Basic Attacks (by Erudo): a must to make the most out of the gifts from your Leader
-- Saddle Up! (by RuinsFate): discusses mounts, that are an easy way to increase damage, mobility and sometimes defenses
-- Skill Power (by Ignis_Fatuus): optimising skills and flexibility with as little resources as possible

Party Optimisation
-- 10 Rules of Party Optimisation (by Rancid_Rogue): makes sure that you don't have any glaring holes in your group
-- The Art of... Defending / Leading / Striking (by mkill) / Controlling 101 (by alien270): basic strategies how to fulfill a particular role well
-- Party Building (Dr373, p24): a primer on gathering a well rounded party

7.2 Guide Status

Version History
0.1 - posted skeleton on 21.09.2010
1.0 - guide completed on 26.10.2010

nothing right now

Looking For
-- feedback, as usual...
-- actual play logs
-- examples for any section, in particular more builds

7.3 Remarks

Thanks for Contributions:
WEContact, Mengu74, Dedekine, Rancid_Rogue, The_Yakk, Nelphine, yargon, Auspex7, billyh, tylara67, Black_Egg

In-play experiences, criticism and suggestion are always welcome.
This guide has been and is a lot of work. If you have used it, please have the courtesy to drop a line here and tell me how you liked it !

back to top

I am very, very interested in this topic.
I had no idea.
I'm building my '3000 damage in one round using only AP's/encounter powers, with an average of +45 attack bonus at level 24' alpha-strike party specifically for this topic, including snap shots of level 11/17/24 (higher becomes too silly).
I'm building my '3000 damage in one round using only AP's/encounter powers, with an average of +45 attack bonus at level 24' alpha-strike party specifically for this topic, including snap shots of level 11/17/24 (higher becomes too silly).

Proof this game is irrevokably broken and they already need to restart from scratch by releasing 5th edition.
"Invokers are probably better round after round but Wizard dailies are devastating. Actually, devastating is too light a word. Wizard daily powers are soul crushing, encounter ending, havoc causing pieces of awesome." -AirPower25 Sear the Flesh, Purify the Soul; Harden the Heart, and Improve the Mind; Born of Blood, but Forged by Fire; The MECH warrior reaches perfection.
I'm building my '3000 damage in one round using only AP's/encounter powers, with an average of +45 attack bonus at level 24' alpha-strike party specifically for this topic, including snap shots of level 11/17/24 (higher becomes too silly).

Proof this game is irrevokably broken and they already need to restart from scratch by releasing 5th edition.

Troll much?

Nelphine -- I'd be interested in seeing that...we don't get a lot of Party OP around here, so it'd be a nice change of pace.   I hope you're making the builds relatively questionable-free, so people don't ignore them due to gray areas.

Lang -- You should consider strong use of Itemage when doing your sectional breakdowns.  A perfect example is the Cannith Goggles for Perception.  Cheap as heck, and extremely useful, espec if you have Arcane powers.
Regarding Momentum, I have a player who likes to throw this term around, but in a somewhat different context. Momentum is something like the warlock hitting the enemy to lower their AC and grant combat advantage, followed by the Warlord easily hitting the enemy, so everyone gets +5 damage against him, followed by the Invoker who now gives that enemy and one other vulnerable 5 to all damage, while giving the warlord a bonus to his next attack, then the barbarian capitalizes on that, takes the target down, uses Howl of Triumph to lower defense for a bunch of other enemies, and back to the warlock who has the barbarian's and invoker's bonuses to open up on the next target, and after him, the Warlord has some nice bonuses. Momentum carries them forward.

Gaining initiative can certainly help initiate momentum, but it is probably just one of many parts of the process.
Builds are fairly basic - biggest 'issue' is the using of ammunition extensively.  But (in theory) all encounters are over in one round worth of actions (even if the DM splits the encounter into multiple waves, your total number of attacks won't change that much), so you have relatively small ammunition expenditures per level.

Other big problem:  I can't figure out a way for my Con Bard (who needs to max Init before any other considerations) to get both extreme multi-attacks AND high cha.  At the moment he's a Revenant who maxes Dex/Con; which means all his Bard powers (and his useability in Heroic) is extremely questionable. (As a note, the entire rest of the party, well not superb, is at least useable in heroic; and due to excessive healing, will probably fair just fine.)

As a final note:  The 'one round encounter nova' at level 11 is shaping up to be ~750 damage, which isn't as amazing as level 24.. but it's still pretty darn reasonable, especially with everyone in the party ~ +23 init.   These nova's are also totally based on only one round; no prep rounds.  (So for instance, my rangers never use Hunter's Quarry as it's far too action intensive - I only use plural because I have 2 MC rangers in the party, I'm not actually using multiple base rangers).
Chapter #2 is done.
All feedback is appreciated. What do you think of the format ?

Great - I like that !
Have you considered Tiefling for your Bard ? They have a feat that let's them use Cha for init (among other things).

I considered going into detail with items. But in the end I found that it would quickly make a very longwinded (and thus boring and only moderately useful) list. I'll instead link Soulliards Item Handbook, or any more specific guide if somebody knows or writes one.

I have expanded the section with your suggestion. I initially considered naming it initiative, but although initiative is a very important part of it, it isn't everything and hence the two different usages of the term would have become confusing.
One more little thing that's bugging me... Stratagem, not strategam.

Looking forward to all the content.
Thanks for the catch. Any better suggestions for something like "piece of a strategy" btw ?
Tactic and maneuver are good synonyms off the top of my head. I'm watching this thread with interest. Keep up the good work.
Since this is a party-op piece, you might consider a brief discussion of melee/ranged balance in the party. Melee characters tend to synergise better and have historically offered better damage output, but they need time to close (especially critical when you gain surprise and when the enemy starts out a ways away) and can get in each others way if the party is too melee-heavy (if an enemy wedges himself in a corner, there's only room for 3 non-reach melees to attack him).
Issue with Tiefling: No way to gain multiple multi-attack powers, and the Bard is probably the most feat-starved character as it is.  At level 11 I need 2 multi-attacks, and at level 16+ I need 3 (preferably 4).  The only way I can think to do that is Twin Strike or PMC Ranger; but Twin Strike requires either Revenant/Dex (no Bard powers) or Half-Elf/Cha (no Init); PMC Ranger requires PP choice, and War Chanter is simply too awesome to give up.  Annoying thing is that in epic, Martial Mastery + Epic Resurgence would allow 1 encounter swap to cover all the multi-attacks required, but that would neglect Paragon.  Bah!
Why bard over warlord? For alpha striking, warlord gives everyone the huge initiative bonus, as well as more attack granting and buffs (ish).

Or, why not hybrid? Add your Cha to everyone's initiative, play Half-Elf, grab Twin Strike, et cetera...
Ah, sorry - you don't know the whole party:  Party is:

Artificer|Invoker/Flame of Hope/Soul of the World (ED is because I hate demigod)
Bard/War Chanter/Fatesinger (Need Valorous for War Chanter, need lots of Majestic Words for Fatesinger, so must be a pure Bard; also offers multiclassing into multiple other classes so I can pick up lots of little tricks like the MP2 Warlord MC feats)
Warlord/Guildmaster Thief/Heir of Empire (because it simply is the best lazy lord build PP/ED combo out there)
Warlord/PMC Ranger/Martial Archetype (because I wanted both Taclord and Bravuralord; but I also needed significant nova damage)
Ranger|Rogue/Hybrid Paragon/Reincarnate Champion (because I think it's hilarious that something that can compete for best nova capacity party has both a PMC character and a Hybrid Paragon character.  I mean, who woulda thunk it?) 

Other big problem:  I don't have enough holy symbols in this party (2 to be exact).  Having 5 holy symbols would be my preference, but I don't see a way to do that without losing excessive amounts of damage.  (For instance: Reincarnate Champion encounter nova is about 70 damage higher than Demigod/Chosen.. is losing 70 damage worth gaining 1 AP/day?  Note: I don't like using multiple copies of the same item in order to gain more daily uses of that item.) 
That's... a lot of leaders! Bard realy needs a multi-attack? Pure half-elf with Adept Dilettante not good enough for you?
I like how it's shaping up. Here are some specific suggestions:

1. If 'Momentum' is being used synonymously, or being likened with, 'turns ahead', then it might be good to include other ways in which Team Hero can actually set back Team Monster's effective turn count. Dominate and Stun are two ways in which Team Hero can prevent Team Monster from getting turns at all. Control effects of such potence that they cause Team Monster to have 'hollow' or wasted turns-- like, say... Immobilizing Team Monster's melee before they get in range, or Lash of the Long Night to slide a target 6 squares and slow it, can effectively remove turns from many ctreatures. Other effects don't automatically create the same situation, but Dishearten aug2/Psychic Lock can create a similar effect over time, as monster miss rate jacks up sufficiently to create a situation where they basically bleed effective turns away.

2. While the ideas are well explained, illustrating a point with a specific example would probably be a good thing. Example-- 'Hammer': Wizard goes before Team Monster, and drops Corrosive Mist, Action Point, Prismatic Burst over a 25 square box. Sorc follows, and drops Blazing Starfall (+Resounding Thunder shenanigans) over the same box. Minions in the box are gone, and Standards who have been hit more than once should be bloodied by the start of their first turn.

Note: From a tactical standpoint, I actually prefer bringing a multi-target hitter to the party whenever possible, because this guy can do 2 key things at once:

-- outright damage to multiples.
-- equally important to your 'scalpel', this guy minion checks multiples at once, enabling your single-target guys to drop bombs on turn 1, without inadvertently throwing resources into Minions. Of course, after the 'minion check', the target has taken a hit already, and is one step closer to getting smoked.

As a result, I actually find that taking the 'scalpel' approach with a team works better with a blaster in the party.

3. When I hear 'Divide & Conquer', this invokes a specific notion-- actually physically breaking the field up into effective zones. This is something that I've been a part of a lot at gaming tables, and am a big fan of as an encounter-solving strategy. Specific ways in which this takes place:

a) using trapping zone attacks, or movement blocking/hindering burst/blast attacks to create a box.

b) Defenders! Fighters (Come and Get It), Wardens (Form of Winter's Herald), etc often have tools that let them 'suck in' enemies, or control their immediate areas.

c) single-target isolators. Lots of people can get this done-- Avengers, Runepriests (immo At-Will), any Defender, Rangers, etc-- basically, any melee who imposes themselves between the target, and a place to which it would like to move, and who has some means of preventing or hindering movement.

Breaking the field up into zones like this often forces Team Monster to spread fire, and prevents their ability to help protect allies. Example:

Team Monster's frontline consists of a group of obvious Soldiers, and one clearly 'special' guy, who is just right of center.

Fighter moves up, just to the right of the middle of the field, and uses Come and Get It to pull in multiple bad guys. Avenger moves up farther to the right, and uses Avenger's Demand to pull the 'special guy' 5 squares away from the cluster, push it 2 squares, and prone it (with the Avenger adjacent).

End result: Fighter has created a control box, and the Avenger is now isolated with 'special guy', who begins his turn prone, and with 2 hits into him (Come and Get It + Avenger's Demand).

I think action denial falls more under the 'momentum' umbrella, where 'Divide & Conquer' relates more to tactics and space control.

May just be my opinion, ofc.
@Lang:  I'm glad you like the concept of my party!  I'm sorry I'm hijacking (parts of) your thread to try to optimize it, but the people in here are the ones who are going to be able to help me out.

@Sadistic:  I would love to be just a Half-Elf with Twin Strike Dilettante, but as I mentioned above, I MUST have maxed constitution.  Which would mean that I have to drop Dexterity.  Which would cause my init to suffer.  (And for paragon/epic, which is where this party is designed for, I would never actually use my bard powers anyway.)  So the conflict is:  In epic/paragon, do I sacrifice my Init in return for being able to use my Bard powers in heroic?  It's a rather irritating conundrum.  

@People in general: I've just realized how much I love Deva/Soul of the World.  My artificer|Invoker (who always goes first, and therefore doesn't get the War Chanter boost), who concentrates primarily on buffing other PC's, actually manages to dish out 265 damage in his nova round at level 24.  Which is about 120 more than I was expecting.   Not that this is particularly significant compared to the total damage to the party, but still.. I'm happy my controller actually contributes to the damage scores of the party.

@People further in general:  I've also completely given up on radiant damage.  No one in the party bothers with it.  Which is kind of ridiculous given that the initial basis for this party was a band of Half-Elf Twin Striking Radiant Superior Crossbow wielders.  Almost everyone uses Lightning damage instead.  And there aren't even any Lightning Vulnerability abilities in the game for me to abuse! (*That I know of.  If there are, please tell me! Perhaps I can make this even stronger!)
Consider the other end of this ... Omega Striking ; to coin a term.

PSG says the PCs are supposed to be +2 compared to the Monsters.
The longer a combat lasts, the closer to the average math it gets.
So the PCs "ought" to win, and it "ought" to be easier the longer the combat.
OTOH - if a monster is actually numerically superior, the longer the combat,
the longer the monster has to establish it's superiority.

Flip the script, back to Alpha Striking, and you get:
(1) ... less and less interaction with the long term math of the game
(2) ... swingier combat
(3) ... higher need for intentional plans at the start of combat
(4) ... surprise and initiative are much more important

my 2 cents Laughing

Here comes your 19th forums breakdown ... ohh who's to blame, it ain't 5E driving you insane.


Consider the other end of this ... Omega Striking ; to coin a term.

PSG says the PCs are supposed to be +2 compared to the Monsters.
The longer a combat lasts, the closer to the average math it gets.
So the PCs "ought" to win, and it "ought" to be easier the longer the combat.
OTOH - if a monster is actually numerically superior, the longer the combat,
the longer the monster has to establish it's superiority.

Flip the script, back to Alpha Striking, and you get:
(1) ... less and less interaction with the long term math of the game
(2) ... swingier combat
(3) ... higher need for intentional plans at the start of combat
(4) ... surprise and initiative are much more important

my 2 cents

This is similar to something I touch on in 'Swift & Without Mercy'. Specifically, I refer to the two most simple approaches to winning encounters-- enabling your party to shorten encs (offensive focus), and enabling your party to comfortably extend them (defensive focus).

Here's a key thing to note about one of the main avenues through which parties seek to shorten encounters:

Generating lots of extra attacks in short order causes two things...
1) bad guys die faster
2) you approach the average math of the game more quickly. Along the way, you simultaneously help mitigate the impact of 'cold' dice, while also letting your party benefit more from 'hot' dice.

Also noteworthy: Alpha Strike parties that don't focus 100% on DPR are easily capable of featuring builds that thrive in extended encounters.

As an example, here's a party that I often run with in Delve-style runs/series of encounters (as opposed to an ongoing campaign). XP budgets are typically L+4 to L+5, and series typically run for 2-4 consecutive encs:

Chaladin/Hospitaler (Deva, +Battle Intuition)
Predator Druid/PP with +2d6 poison (Elf, ofc)
Avenger/Radiant Servant (also mine)
Pacifist Cleric/Merciful Healer (Elf, Dex secondary)
Killswitch (heavy party-movement variant)

*we sometimes sub in a Wizard, Barb, or Invoker.

In this case, even the Chaladin and Pacifist contribute to establishing immediate control of the encounter, and the Pacifist actually helps us blow targets up (Remorse is pure win). When we run into encs that are built expressly to stretch out-- wave/stage encs, constant monster generators, etc-- we deal with that just as easily. The party is durable, mobile (Reorient and Slick Concoction help toss the Chaladin around), reliable (2 x Elven Accuracy, Memory of a Thousand Lifetimes, OoE), and generally consistent in all ways.

While Chaladin and Pacifist aren't going to produce mountains of DPR, classes like these (ie, those known for being heavily defensive) generally have a lot of built in control, and blend in *perfectly* with parties set up to establish immediate *control*/advantage.
Why arent you on IRC you slacker?

Also, going first is never a bad thing. Not unless the DM has intentionally created a situation to lay a trap anyway.

And what sort of DM would do that?? 
Why arent you on IRC you slacker?

Also, going first is never a bad thing. Not unless the DM has intentionally created a situation to lay a trap anyway.

And what sort of DM would do that?? 

haha, i'll be there soon. I'm taking a breather from yardwork-- I just annihilated a vine that was trying to climb up my neighbors' house (the neighbors who we're really close with/who are the reason we got this house, if you recall the story), did a bunch of pruning & plant shaping, etc.

Also-- you make a good point about traps. That's actually the main reason why I slapped Slick Concoction on Killswitch after already having Reorient the Axis. Gotta be able to press 'reset' if the DM is sneaky!

As it happens, even you have to admit that us going first was a very big positive for us-- we had 4 targets under hard control, all of our heroes in position, etc... what ruined that mess for us were the back to back runs of sub-7 dice rolls (Noble Adept theme power being required to land our only hit out of 9 attacks at one target = dice fail there).

Given how devious that enc was... there's no way that I could see it being a bad thing that we went ahead of Team Monster. You had so much good stuff going there, we'd have been smashed if we hadn't been able to guarantee going early and getting some kind of control off. You obviously know what you're doing, and giving a creative DM an L+5 budget to work with = a recipe for a very rough road. If you got to make your turns before us, we'd have been screwed before we had a chance to win the day.

iirc, Team Monster going first would have been... a Dominate (psychic mage?), double breaths (Pack Dragons), the 'twin' dropping a nasty turn on someone, and the Lamia doin' what dat dere Lamia do.

That's not something I'd have wanted to see! hahahahaha

Man... we gotta hook up that next run soon. That was fun!
Oh, no, it was a good thing, for sure! Going first is never bad.

Even if a trap is laid.

The "Lamia" was the dominator, the psychic mage was the one with the fear and the stun, and who gave out temp hp to Team Monster.

Farror: Medium fey humanoid (devil, shapechanger) was the dominator.

I know. I cant wait to see what damage I can do with the massive budget I get next time.


Actually, Auspex/Seeten, that kind of encounter with a 'trap' starting sounds like just the type that 'ought' to be extremely nasty for my Alpha-Strike party, without actively picking things that would play completely against my party (like choosing all lightning immune invisible lurkers, etc) - would you guys be able to post a bit more detail about that encounter?

And, since Seeten seems to be a proverbially 'sneaky' DM, would you mind coming up with any further (rough) encounters that you think might be nasty for a damage-oriented Alpha Strike?

I ask because I'm looking to 'DM-Proof' my Alpha-Strike team - basically, take the nastiest things (that you can achieve with say a level n+7 budget), and determine how to counter them, within the framework of the party I already have.  One common theme is waves of minions/standards; but Twin Strike on 3 characters, with typical high striker AB, ought to be enough to deal with that.  So I'm looking for other 'classic' nasty situations to be thrown at me.

(I should mention, I'm usually the DM of my groups.. so I tend to lock myself in the box of my own imagination, and I love seeing other ideas; I'm specifically NOT looking to say 'oh no, that wouldn't work, because my party is too awesome'.  I want to be able to say 'oooo that IS nasty... but if I do x and y, maybe my party can run away and recover safely!') 
Wow folks, that's a lot of discussion !

I definately want to address the melee vs ranged options, but I don't think it's such an inherent decision for a-s like the ones in chapter #2. Hence I'll discuss it in chapter #3 as finetuning - although it is a decision that might merit to be move up on the scale - I'll see then.

Oh, feel free to discuss all that here - that's exactly what this thread is made for.
To include the party I'd like it to be at least functional in Heroic. Abusing the hell out of stuff like ammunition is fine enough for CharOp, but I loathe characters that aren't reasonably playable at all levels.
A few thoughts for your party: You delay (not ready - delay) without losing anything on the first turn, you just need everybody to go before the mobs. Thought about cascading use of U2s for init optimisation ? I think a Champions's Ring (L17 I think) can produce LightVul 5. Have you considered forced movement on your allies (it comes for free on the Invoker to two targets at Paragon+) ? With Agile Opportunist you can abuse up to two Immediates (before and after your turn - adjust by delaying) for two extra MBAs.

Momentum: I haven't so much thought about it as turns ahead measurement, because it was supposed by denote a generally surperior tactical situation, but it's definately interesting and something I'll ponder - there are actually many ways to do that, from initiative to control to killing stuff to abusing terrain.
Hammer vs Scalpel: That's definately a reasonable approach, and exactly what I was thinking about when I wrote that they could catch up each other's slack. On the other hand somebody might just have a super pimped Monster Knowledge and hence never need Minion checks, or play with DMs who call out Minions. Or they might use an Archer Ranger instead of the Sorc, doing some Minion checking with Twin Strike and afterwards dropping the bomb on the main target. All of these are viable approaches, and in the guide I try to stay as neutral as possible.
DaC: In the end IMO it doesn't really matter how you break up the enemy force - as long as you deny them taking effective actions, you've done well. It means the rest of your team takes less fire, and can much easier concentrate on the remaining targets, even if they're not a-s optimised - Ms. No is a typical example who combines all forms of control break up the enemies, and allow even a random party to concentrate on smoking the remains.
DaC vs BF (vs Momentum): DaC is about taking their actions now, and killing them afterwards. BF doesn't bother with taking away actions now, because it's only interested in taking away actions for good by killing it. As said above, including that metric actions denied into Momentum merits thought.
Examples: I probably want to keep chapter #2 clean of too long examples. As basic theoretical introduction, I want to keep it short and I don't want to root people to specifics. On the other hand I want to discuss acutual examples extensively in chapters #5 & #6 - although I might still reshuffle some overall structure in the future...

Auspex basically gave my answer. While you certainly can build an endurance party, I think only going for the longterm is somewhat dangerous, as you'll fall for a good a-s from the mobs. Also... it's not what this guide really is about. ;)
A Healic is definately a good example for backup type characters - throw out some control to DaC in the beginning, and then have huge amounts of healing available to get your squishies through. Achilles is another one - solid DPR from start (= a-s) to end (= mop-up), a few lockdown abilities for the early turns and enough resources to burn to draw away fire in long fights from his squishy allies.
I'll also discuss balancing a-s and endurance in chapter #5.

Oh yes, please - anti-encounters are definately a good contribution to show the limits of pure a-s.
And it might make me feel better for not being the only Evil DM - or manically crackle because nobody is as ruthless as I.Innocent
I've run a series of Encounters for Kill Switch, Slash and Dash, Hobgoblin and Dr. No.

In the level 16 encounter, they died, from the aforementioned Semi-Trap.

It was touch and go for a while, but in the end they ran out of resources. Slash and Dash had a huge string of bad luck early, though.
Actually, Auspex/Seeten, that kind of encounter with a 'trap' starting sounds like just the type that 'ought' to be extremely nasty for my Alpha-Strike party, without actively picking things that would play completely against my party (like choosing all lightning immune invisible lurkers, etc) - would you guys be able to post a bit more detail about that encounter?

And, since Seeten seems to be a proverbially 'sneaky' DM, would you mind coming up with any further (rough) encounters that you think might be nasty for a damage-oriented Alpha Strike?

I ask because I'm looking to 'DM-Proof' my Alpha-Strike team - basically, take the nastiest things (that you can achieve with say a level n+7 budget), and determine how to counter them, within the framework of the party I already have.  One common theme is waves of minions/standards; but Twin Strike on 3 characters, with typical high striker AB, ought to be enough to deal with that.  So I'm looking for other 'classic' nasty situations to be thrown at me.

(I should mention, I'm usually the DM of my groups.. so I tend to lock myself in the box of my own imagination, and I love seeing other ideas; I'm specifically NOT looking to say 'oh no, that wouldn't work, because my party is too awesome'.  I want to be able to say 'oooo that IS nasty... but if I do x and y, maybe my party can run away and recover safely!') 

One of the things I did is put the sturdiest mobs in obvious places, and hide the nasty controller types behind obstructions so during the first turn or two, they couldnt be seen/attacked, guaranteeing the alpha strike would be on what I wanted it to be on.

iirc, it was L17 enc vs L12 party, with the listed chars.

We had 4 targets under hard control (stunned + prone), 2 targets marked by Dr No, and had S&D, Hobo, and Dr No in position, all by the end of T1. The only target who we hadn't seen/found was the Psychic Mage, who we were having some sight line issues with in maptools-- I couldn't see him at all until the last round of combat, even while he was standing in the open, 7 squares away from me, with no obstructions in between.

Starting with things around corners is something I've seen a lot-- not surprisingly. That particular tactic is pretty commonly used. We negated the corner situation for all but the Psychic Mage before Team Monster was able to move by dropping a Reorient, and had all of the good guys positioned where we wanted them. Putting the Psychic Mage behind *2* corners from our starting point was a solid plan.

It wasn't just Slash & Dash who had a bad run of luck with the dice, sadly. iirc, Dr No missed his first 4 standard action attacks. Hobo landed basically everything on his control nova on T1, then landed only 1/3 hits on his second turn. Slash & Dash couldn't hit *anything* to save his life, and...

Well... at one point, we had Combat Advantage against the Lamia due to Stun, and we decided to light her up. The plan was to bury her, then move Slash & Dash after the Psychic Mage. Can't go wrong with Combat Advantage, right?

Between Slash & Dash & Killswitch novas, with 9 attacks generated on the target, we rolled 9 natural misses. We had to use our third/final Noble Adept theme power (we had to use 2 of the 3 on turn 1 to get one of the stuns to land) in order to make 1 out of the 9 misses land on the Lamia. Every single attack roll out of that series was 7 or below. I believe Seeten told us later that she survived that turn with 40 hps-- which means that we only needed to manage a 33% hit rate during those Novas in order to kill her.

To illustrate how jacked up things were... at the end of round 2, everyone was at full health, we were sitting on our full set of heals (Rousing Words, 2 x Inspiring Word, and a 1/day Majestic Word), and we had a Punishing Eye down. At this point, the misses were actually funny, because we had thrown so many attack rolls (Hobo: 7 attacks through 2 rounds, S&D: 6-7 attacks through 2 rounds, Killswitch: 7 attacks through 2 rounds, Dr No: 2 attacks through 2 rounds-- average of more than 5 attacks per char over 2 rounds), and felt like there was NO WAY the rolls would continue like that. We felt like we had plenty of time for the law of averages to kick in, and expected to be good to go.

The thing is, that never happened. We continued rolling horribly for the entire encounter.

When you're rolling that badly, against that type of budget, and the DM knows what he's doing, etc... you're basically hosed.

All of the builds we brought to the table did what they were supposed to do. We had instant advantage, instant control, temp HP all over the place (2 x Enhanced Resistive Formula), 2 targets marked, etc.

We flat out got dice raped.

If we were able to land any hits, that would have been a challenging encounter, which ultimately resulted in a Team Hero win.

Now, this isn't to take anything away from Seeten. Here are specific things that he did in the Enc that make me say that he, as a DM, did a very good job:

1. Monster selection was very good. He picked monsters based in equal parts on their defenses, and powers available. They had solid control, good damage, and could pressure multiple targets at once pretty effectively. An L+5 budget is a lot to work with, but it's still a budget, and depending on how you spend it, you're still going to get a wide variety of results.

2. Positioning was as good as it could be against our group, plain and simple. While we wound up having exactly the position we wanted after my first turn, he had the Psychic Mage behind a dividing wall inside the room, so it remained safe from attacks. One other key note-- from the previous room, we couldn't just light up the other bad guys, or yank them into the first room to separate them and blow something up. If we had been able to see them, we might have simply slid something closer to us, and stuck Dr No in the doorway to hold the choke point while we operated from safety. So... while position didn't necessarily stop us from getting where we wanted to be, it did prevent us from being able to create a really ridiculous scenario. Seeten did a good job of arranging the monsters inside the room so that he wouldn't be hosed when we ran through. The two most accessible targets in the room both had Resist X Psychic, and were Large, so they gobbled up a decent chunk of space.

3. Seeten did a very good job of managing targets. He got his hardest-to-hit target next to Slash & Dash early, and did a good job of pressuring LDB with it, and making LDB throw attacks at it (iirc, we had to use a position trick to get LDB to the Lamia to try to nova her down). One highlight was using a 2-target attack to make Slash & Dash and Dr No both run away from the Psychic Mage, which caused them to provoke OAs, and temporarily put them out of position. Another was using a Dominate on Killswitch at a key time.

The only thing I think Seeten could have done to be more nasty, given all of the same creatures, same party, etc, was playing peek-a-bo with the Psychic Mage at the corner. IE, T1 = move out, attack. T2 = attack, move back behind the wall. Rinse, repeat. If we had gotten even "bad" dice rolls, the Lamia would have died, and we'd have sent Slash & Dash after the Psychic Mage. By popping out and back, Seet could have had a possible trap set to isolate S&D out of LoS from the Leader (the Pack Dragons teleport).That's just speculation, though.
Random thought on action denial:
I don't think it completely meshes with momentum, but there are certainly some intersections. DaC & BF address action denial, but in very different ways (AD now vs AD by applying the dead condition later).
Furthermore I somehow feel that it would merit its own essay, likely taking up more space then I'd like it to give here and hence detracting much from the actual topic. On the other hand I claim I have a relatively good grasp to add some mechanical basis to it, so we can at least gain a rough measure.
Thoughts ? Priorities ?
@ Lang--

It's a guide, right?

Do you want to help people gain in depth knowledge of things (which requires more information, rather than less), or do you want to simply define basic terms?

If the goal is to educate, then I strongly recommend adding inserts to each section to elaborate, provide clear and specific examples, etc. Using sblocks to compartmentalize the text will help keep the whole thing easy to read, and will make everything feel less cluttered.

Simply put, the guide is only marginally informative right now, because the concepts provided to this point are probably no-brainers for anyone reading it. Everybody knows the difference between bursting and focus fire already, so calling those 'Hammer' and 'Scalpel' doesn't actually provide anything new, other than a label.

This isn't to say that there is no value here, however. On the contrary, if you provide enough insight in each section, readers may very well take a LOT away from this. Insight and Perspective are why people interested in Alpha Striking would want to read a guide like this.

With any guide, the goal should be to provide prospective readers with something which they didn't have before reading it. You want to offer them something new.

As an example... (aren't examples great?), I'll use 2 basketball 'analysts'.

1. Doug Collins. He does a lot of national stuff, TNT, NBC, etc. The guy is very, very knowledgeable of the game. While he's providing analysis, most people who know the game inside out aren't going to gain a LOT of new things from what he says, but even as someone who knows the ins and outs of the game like crazy, he still drops something on me every game that is new to me. Like this... "... this guy got on the floor about 30 minutes before the rest of the team, and was working on catching the ball at the left wing, and making a 2-dribble pull up going toward the baseline. The coaches told me going into the game that they thought they could find some clean looks at the basket going to that spot, because has some young guys who are still learning the team's defense, and sometimes miss rotations."

Now... I know all about defenses, I know the specifics of why NBA coaches like guards to develop 2-dribble pull ups, etc-- but having an analyst actually highlight a specific 'what & why' during the game is the type of thing that draws your attention to a specific scenario that you may have missed.

2. Michael Holton. He's a local guy. Does halftime shows for a lot of the Blazer broadcasts on CSNW. Holton is a guy who actually knows the game, but for whatever reason, he doesn't actually provide any insight whatsoever during his commentary. Instead, he rolls a highlight, describes what you're already looking at, and says something ridiculous afterward like (and I wish I were making this up-- it did NOT get slapped on a particularly flashy play, by the way), "... that's called... Razzle Dazzle!"


Insight + Perspective > 'Razzle Dazzle'.

You are welcome to link to or quote from my blog posts "Playing a Warlock" for your real-life examples chapter.  The description of Gondolin's first-ever critical hit (and how I could have improved upon it) are similar to your purpose here.

Best complements I have yet received

Making it up as I go along:

{BRJN} If I was writing the Tome of Lore, I would let Auppenser sleep. But I also would have him dream. In his dreaming he re-activates the innate powers of (some) mortal minds. Or his dreaming changes the nature of reality - currently very malleable thanks to Spellplague &c. Or whatever really cool flavor text and pseudo-science explanation people react positively to.

{Lord_Karsus} You know, I like that better than the explanations for the Spellplague.


{BRJN} If Bhaal approves of The Joker, does he approve of Jack Nicholson's portrayal or Heath Ledger's protrayal more?

{Stigger} That question is utterly classic, and completely on target.


Prepped ahead of time:

I started the 4e thread "1001 Failed Interrogation Results" (now lost in that great electronic goodnight, alas)

{ADHadh} These are all good and make sense! I just can't come up with something that's not covered here and is not completely ridiculous.


(News bulletin: Updated thread to be posted after I review the 5e DMG)


My 5e characters


none yet - gotta find a group !

Character Ready-to-go:

Erevyn Meliamne, Wood elf Monk1, inspired by "Radar O'Reilley" from M*A*S*H

Concepts I'm kicking around:

Barbarian w/Tough feat, to be nearly indestructible

"Truenamer" cleric - all spells are Verbal

"Buggy" Wizard - insect flavor on everything.  His DMPC / BBEG version is going to become a beetle version of a Worm That Walks.  (See the 4e Lamia.)  Because lichdom is so cliche.

Sign In to post comments