- Jun 2005 -
19235 Posts

What Player Abilities Should the Game Encourage

In a few threads, it has been asked what player abilities should be encouraged, discouraged, or rewarded by the next iteration of D&D.  This is a crucial question for the designers, as it sets up what players and DMs they hope to attract to the game.  I have identified eight different categories of player abilities, and have created the following poll to identify what people would like to see in their games.  Note I am not asking what you want to see in the next iteration of D&D.  Let's assume that the designers are going to make the game as modular as possible and open it up to as many game styles as they can.  What I want to know is what you prefer when you sit down to play D&D.

Feel free to leave a comment below, or participate in the related discussion thread.

Before answering the poll, please review my brief description of each of these categories:

Riddles are a stable of fantasy.  And puzzle-like challenges are also a staple of D&D.  Figuring out your encumbrance, spending one's limited funds, determining who should be on watch with whom, are just a much a puzzle in logic, as solving a sphinx's riddle.  To what extent should these challenges be resolved using the character's skills and knowledge and to what extent should these challenges be resolved using the player's knowledge.  For purposes of this poll, we want to know your opinion of how much weight the player's ability to think logically should factor into the game.

Strategic Gaming
Combat can often resemble a chess match.  But should it?  Some people enjoy the strategic aspects of combat, while other people simply want to get through it quickly and without a lot of granularity.  Strategic gaming rewards strategic grandmasters, but it can alienate people who have little interest in strategy.  How much strategy would you want in your game?

Complicated games involve clues that are scattered across adventures, waiting for players to find them, remember them, and then recall them at strategic moments.  Related to Puzzle-Solving, Lorekeeping encourages players to immerse themselves in a world, to feel a part of it, to ferret out its hidden corners and mysteries and to treat the campaign world as a real, living place.  But Lorekeeping can be a nightmare to track, can discourage casual play, and can feel like a chore without proper guidance. How much guidance should the game have?  How much Lorekeeping should it include?

Aggressive Roleplay
Some games encourage players to create characters with lots of story hooks.  Missing mentors, insane siblings, mysterious benefactors, can all be incorporated into the game with the expectation that the DM will incorporate these hooks into the developing plotline.  However, time spent on one person's story may detract from time spent on others' stories, or on the team's ongoing challenges.  How much should the game encourage, or discourage, players to pursue their own back stories and character personalities?  Should the game punish such activity?  Should it exalt such activity?

These polls will run for one month!  I look forward to the results!

See more at Unearthed Wrecana

Blog Followers 4 Comments 5