|
1 year ago ::
Apr 20, 2012 - 8:44PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
|
Is a familiar considered to be the caster for terms of spells that exclude the caster? Example: Ghoul touch sickens people near the victom except the caster. Would a familiar be subject to that same sickness? Likewise, would a familiar be able to see through the caster's blacklight?
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 21, 2012 - 11:07AM
#2
|
|
|
I don't think so, though possibly they should be.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 21, 2012 - 6:33PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2006
|
The text for Confusion reads: "(for this purpose, a familiar counts as part of the subject’s self)". Thus, that would imply that for other purposes the familiar does not count as part of its owner.
Ever want to try your hand at optimizing, but don't like excessive splatbook use? Come visit the Core Coliseum today, and give it a try.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 21, 2012 - 7:03PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
|
I feel as that is more of a clarification as if the familiar is a seperate entity or not. For the spells like blacklight and ghoul's touch, it seems to be more akin to sharing a spell's exception.
|
|
|
