<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Hammer</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer</link><description>When you have hammer up, does it count as holding a touch spell?  I'm split on it, since it has a specific duration as opposed to just being held until used, but it still a touch spell.</description><item><title>Produce Flames is different, though, because it can also be thrown. In effect, it has two "ranges", in this sense.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer?post_id=525412289#525412289</link><description>Produce Flames is different, though, because it can also be thrown. In effect, it has two "ranges", in this sense.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:15:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I failed my roll to not respond. &gt;_&gt;In any case, after I typed that, I went looking at other SRDs to see if any of them listed Hammer as anything other than a touch spell, and ended up using d20 as a reference myself after. It didn't list Hammer as n</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer?post_id=525409053#525409053</link><description>I failed my roll to not respond. &gt;_&gt;In any case, after I typed that, I went looking at other SRDs to see if any of them listed Hammer as anything other than a touch spell, and ended up using d20 as a reference myself after. It didn't list Hammer as n</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:33:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>As it happens we are, because I prefer to use d20srd.org, but that doesn't affect things.Note that I compared it to Produce Flame, which uses similar language (as it is also a touch attack) and has in the past been ruled to not follow the rules of ho</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer?post_id=525408469#525408469</link><description>As it happens we are, because I prefer to use d20srd.org, but that doesn't affect things.Note that I compared it to Produce Flame, which uses similar language (as it is also a touch attack) and has in the past been ruled to not follow the rules of ho</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:50:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Typical wizards, having a good thing and then throwing something random in there.  Flame blade had a similiar probelm where we were trying to figure out what being wielded like a scimitar meant.  Archaic flavour text from 1E confuses what shoulod be</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer?post_id=525407283#525407283</link><description>Typical wizards, having a good thing and then throwing something random in there.  Flame blade had a similiar probelm where we were trying to figure out what being wielded like a scimitar meant.  Archaic flavour text from 1E confuses what shoulod be</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:56:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Personally, I'm inclined to think something like that happened too. As such, I'm done arguing about it. I stand by my statement that, by the rules, if it's a touch ranged spell that has a target, you would need to hold the charge on it after the dura</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/coco/go/thread/view/89269/29451757/Hammer?post_id=525403073#525403073</link><description>Personally, I'm inclined to think something like that happened too. As such, I'm done arguing about it. I stand by my statement that, by the rules, if it's a touch ranged spell that has a target, you would need to hold the charge on it after the dura</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:59:49 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
