Login | Signup

Community

Activity Feed

    • clemulusrex

      clemulusrex posted to just_be_glad_now's forum thread on the DnD Next group.

      Forum Topic: Postulate: Balancing Realism with Fighter Effectiveness is hard...
      June 6, 2012 at 8:00am
    • clemulusrex

      clemulusrex added a comment to The_Jester's blog post.

      Non-Core Classes
      We know the four big classes: fighter, wizard, rogue, and cleric. Each one...
      June 6, 2012 at 5:06am
      Login to Comment
      Show previous 5 comments... Show previous comments...
      2 / 10
      Kimera757
      Kimera757
      "Since 3e, there’s been the fight to divide rangers into weapon-based camps. “Is your ranger a two-weapon ranger or a bow ranger?” That might be something to jettison and make all rangers great with a bow and able to dual wield. They might specialize, but they can always switch. Drizzt regularly broke out a bow when it suited him and was written as being skilled with it.
      The rest comes easy with some primal nature magic, an ability to track, animal companions, and other wilderness based...

      View full comment
      May 27, 2012 10:28 AM PDT
      clemulusrex
      clemulusrex
      I was going to bring up the same point as wild_captain about sorcerers. The Bloodlines in Pathfinder do a great job of differentiating them from Wizards. I won't take up space here but, I think that a lot of your problems with the 3e core classes were handled pretty well by Pathfinder.
      As to the Paladin, I had some specific comments after seeing the 5e playtest material. I've always like Paladins *conceptually* as virtuous, chivalric warriors, but they've always occupied an uncomfortably...

      View full comment
      June 6, 2012 3:06 AM PDT

My Profile

Blog Posts

More

Comments

My Characters

Lair Assault

Vitals

    Loading...

Calendar

     

Calendar Events

    There are no upcoming events for this calendar.

Friends

(View all friends)
  • Wizards
    Wizards